He said Mike McDaniel was the reason for Tuas success, and asked to see a graphic showing Tuas resume without Mike, then people pressed him saying that Tua was not too shabby during his years without Mike. This is about Tua and his play caller. If Dave would said Chan Gailey, it would have made more sense. But he immediately went to Flores, when, again, we are talking about a coach who made Tua successful bc of his “offensive genius” so to speak.
You're missing my point. Tua was OK with Flores. Not great - and Tua was hurt (emotionally, boo-hoo), by Flores' hard coaching. But he was OK. It's not like McDaniel invented Tua. Tyreek Hill changed lots for both of them.
He said Mike McDaniel was the reason for Tuas success, and asked to see a graphic showing Tuas resume without Mike, then people pressed him saying that Tua was not too shabby during his years without Mike. This is about Tua and his play caller. If Dave would said Chan Gailey, it would have made more sense. But he immediately went to Flores, when, again, we are talking about a coach who made Tua successful bc of his “offensive genius” so to speak.
The “No. 1 team in the country” needed double overtime, phantom holding calls, and a TD incorrectly ruled as an INT by corrupted ACC refs to beat a below average team at home.
Frauds.