Paul F.

Creator Protection Technician | Account Recovery • Ban Reversal • Username Reclaim | Shadowban & Backup Architecture | SEO Rebuild | LinkedIn:

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

If you’ve lost an Instagram or TikTok account, had a username stolen, or think you’re shadowbanned — I’m a Creator Protection Technician.

I handle account recovery, ban reversal, username reclamation, shadowban diagnosis, and safe backup channel architecture.

I also build SEO funnels that rebuild lost audiences even when platforms fail.

My LinkedIn is in my profile if you want to verify I’m a real professional.

DM me if you need a recovery assessment.

Professional. Discreet. Results‑focused.

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

@soy_muse We're building in the best way, I'm enjoying getting paid increasingly to work with the most pleasure

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

have you ever shared a device, network, email, phone number, or account access with anyone else who played Roblox, or have you ever had reason to believe your account was compromised?

That's the single most valuable question right now because the answer will immediately narrow the likely cause by 80%+.

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

If every appeal gets the same rejection, Roblox may believe there's a persistent account link they're relying on. The next step is identifying what connection they're seeing, not sending the same appeal repeatedly.

Was there ever another Roblox account?
Any siblings or household members play Roblox?
Shared PC?
Shared WiFi?
Any VPN use?
Any hacked accounts in the past?
Any email addresses or phone numbers reused across accounts?

Feel free to respond to me privately if you want to go into detail with greater security.

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

Anansi, mi breddah, that's actually the part you should focus on.

If YouTube won't identify the account they're associating your channel with, it becomes extremely difficult to challenge the association itself because you don't know what evidence they're relying on.

At this point, mi wan fi understand whether the channel shared any recovery email, Brand Account relationship, management access, or other connection that could have been interpreted as an account association.

Did the specialist say the alleged association was recent, or could they not provide that information either?

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

A one-year timeline makes me think the issue isn't the original ban itself anymore, but whatever account-association signal Roblox is continuing to rely on.

If Roblox believes your account is linked to another account you don't own, the difficult part is challenging an association they haven't fully explained.

Did any of the appeal responses provide additional details, or have they all repeated the same enforcement message?

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

The fact that Roblox won't identify the account they're associating yours with is probably the most difficult part of the situation.

If the account association is incorrect, it's hard to challenge the decision without understanding what evidence Roblox relied on in the first place.

At this point, I'd be less focused on the 2021 account itself and more focused on whatever signal Roblox used to connect it to another account.

Have all of the appeal responses been identical, or did any of them provide additional details?

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

can't contact Roblox on your behalf or influence their decisions directly.

What I can do is help analyze the enforcement notice, appeal responses, and account history to identify what Roblox may have flagged and whether there's evidence that supports another review.

Right now, the "Other reason" label is so vague that understanding what actually triggered it is the most important step.

Based on what Glotch has shared so far, some of the more common possibilities include:
• An automated moderation false positive
• Asset, animation, or metadata classification issues
• Account-association signals incorrectly linking the account to other activity
• Security or integrity systems flagging behavior patterns rather than content itself
• A moderation category Roblox hasn't disclosed beyond "Other reason"
The challenge is that "Other reason" doesn't tell us which of those Roblox actually relied on. The appeal notices and account history are usually where the useful clues start to appear.

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

The fact that Roblox says the account is linked to another account you don't recognize is the part that stands out to me.

If that's accurate, then the issue may be less about something you did on the 2021 account and more about whatever account Roblox believes it's associated with.

Did Roblox ever identify the linked account, or have the appeal responses just repeated the same enforcement message?

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

Creating or using an account to avoid an enforcement action” is a very specific category, and it usually means Roblox believes the account is connected to a previously moderated or restricted account rather than finding a problem with the account itself.

If you've had this account since 2021, I'd be interested in whether Roblox explained what account or enforcement they believe it's associated with.

Did the appeal response provide any additional details beyond the policy label?

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

Creating or using an account to avoid an enforcement action” is a very specific category, and it usually means Roblox believes the account is connected to a previously moderated or restricted account rather than finding a problem with the account itself.

If you've had this account since 2021, I'd be interested in whether Roblox explained what account or enforcement they believe it's associated with. Did the appeal response provide any additional details beyond the policy label?

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

@INeedjustice222 @tinku_5957 @instagram It may still be possible to recover the account, depending on what triggered the account-integrity decision and whether there is evidence supporting a legitimate challenge.

Please check your DMs.

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

The fact that Revolut upheld the complaint but the restriction is still in place is the part that stands out to me.

Normally I'd want to understand whether this is being treated as a compliance review, source-of-funds review, or an account restriction investigation, because those can follow very different timelines.

Did they explain why the account remains restricted after acknowledging the complaint?

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

Thanks for sharing everything, Riley. At this point, I can offer a structured review of the three bans, the denied appeal, the account history, and the evidence you have available.

I’ll provide a written assessment identifying the most likely account-linkage issue, the evidence worth preserving, and any legitimate appeal options that may remain. Please check your DMs for more details so we can solve this for you ASAP.

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

@khalaf_ahm92620 @TeamYouTube @YouTube What do you mean by "a disabled bot does this"?

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

You're welcome, Riley.

If all three accounts received the same enforcement around the same time, that makes me think Reddit applied the action at the account-association level rather than evaluating each account independently.

The key detail now is what Reddit said in the original inbox message, because that's usually where they explain the policy category they relied on.

Can you share that with me?--feel free to send it in a DM if you want added privacy.

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

@msrileyrose @Reddit Interesting and sad since lots of NSFW channels go untouched and are not banned. I am looking into it for you ttys

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

What do you mean by "a disabled bot"?

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

The lack of notices is actually one of the more interesting parts.

If Reddit linked the accounts together first and then applied the enforcement, it's possible the secondary accounts inherited the same action without much account-specific detail.

At this point I'd be most interested in whether any appeal responses mention ban evasion, account security, or account association.

Those clues usually tell you more than the original ban itself.

Have you received any appeal response at all, or just the bans with no follow-up?

[Paul F. @PFTechRescue]

Thanks for sharing that. Deleting videos by itself normally wouldn't explain a Circumvention Policy termination.
>
The part I'm still trying to understand is why YouTube applied that specific policy category instead of another one. Did the termination email provide any additional detail beyond the word "Circumvention," or was that the entire explanation?