A letter written to my daughter, but never sent,
“What you must think, when you are all alone
When all is still and quiet
Rejecting who you haven’t yet met
That woman, she’s waiting for you”
by @pittparents https://t.co/FHssbrHan5
This is how kids think a trait they have is of the opposite sex and they must be born in the wrong body. This is one of many ways into the trans cult. Most kids are reading 💩 from TRAs. @pittparents@rogd_boys_exist
A letter written to my daughter, but never sent,
“What you must think, when you are all alone
When all is still and quiet
Rejecting who you haven’t yet met
That woman, she’s waiting for you”
by @pittparents https://t.co/FHssbrHan5
Parents who refuse to affirm that their child is the opposite sex should not be treated as abusers. This important new @Heritage factsheet examines how gender-affirming policies have influenced child welfare systems across the US.
Lament of the Rejected Mother,
“What I did to justify the agony of estrangement, I’m not sure;
but it sure as hell hurts, and it’s getting much worse.”
by @pittparents https://t.co/09Qcy9t1Uk
Lament of the Rejected Mother,
“What I did to justify the agony of estrangement, I’m not sure;
but it sure as hell hurts, and it’s getting much worse.”
by @pittparents https://t.co/09Qcy9t1Uk
When are we going to start talking about NPOs and their "too big to fail" exploits? They became so big & went so far over what they originally sold themselves as, they had to branch out into offering even more extreme services & have to commit fraud to hide it to stay afloat.
So many parents are suppressing their own beliefs to avoid friction, or worse, complete estrangement, from their children as they progress in their medicalization. The realization that you have to let them make a huge mistake that will impact them for the rest of their lives is one of the hardest thing to endure.
Curiouser and curiouser…
“Prosilio is not transitioning to an adult-only practice. The decision was made in November 2025 to shut down Prosilio entirely, effective October 1, 2026, or sooner.”
Prosilio is/was the youth gender clinic that Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy slithered off to when CHLA shuttered its clinic doors.
https://t.co/qBmlKxY3cU
I don't think the New York Times coverage of gender clinic closures is that bad. What's missing, however, is genuine curiosity about why the hospitals agreed to settle.
This was not a decision taken lightly. It's fair to assume that gender clinicians and their allies within these hospitals, especially those located in blue states, face little-to-no opposition from other doctors or administrators.
It's also known that hospitals went to the mat to fight closure efforts previously. That's Exhibit A. So, what's changed? Why the seeming capitulation now?
Enter Exhibit B: mounting evidence of billing fraud, which comes from 3 sources.
(1) Inferentially, from billing of puberty blockers for treatment of central precocious (abnormally early) puberty in 14- and 15-year-olds.
(2) From gender clinicians and quasi-medical groups like WPATH, which has openly and explicitly recommended using "endocrine disorder" when billing for medical interventions in minors without an endocrine disorder (although they are likely to develop such a disorder as a result of treatment).
(3) From court records in resolved qui tam lawsuits (e.g., in Texas) that show evidence of False Claims Act violations.
The combination of these easily verifiable sources, together with the unexpected willingness of blue state hospitals to settle with the DOJ, should trigger curiosity about the leverage the DOJ actually had over NYU, Mt. Sinai, and other hospitals.
It seems highly implausible that hospitals in New York, with Letitia James and Mamdani paying close attention, would shutter their clinics and pay out millions of $ unless the DOJ had court-proof evidence of billing fraud.
Also, it's September 2026, and the New York Times still hasn't done an investigative report on how major medical associations and scientific journals have promoted misinformation and stifled debate on youth gender medicine.
I still can’t get over reading about this recent Finnish study.
The study followed every young person under 23 who contacted Finland’s nationally centralized gender identity clinics between 1996 and 2019 — 2,083 people — and followed them for up to 25 years.
The authors found that mental health did not improve after medical gender reassignment. And they noted that in some individuals, the medical procedures “appear to be linked to deterioration in mental health.”
So my question is: how, in the human world, did we allow this to happen to our young generation? How?
How could schools push young people toward this path and keep it from their parents?
How could karate coaches do the same?
How could therapists get a young person on that train instead of slowing everything down and asking more questions?
How could endocrinologists do the same?
How could colleges become part of it?
How could DCF become involved in a family because a child was questioning her identity, while the adults around her were simultaneously encouraging the gender-identity path?
How could a pastor, after meeting a young person once, become involved in a process that could ultimately tear a family apart?
And how did so many adults come to believe that “affirming” a young person meant moving them toward hormones and surgeries instead of first asking whether those interventions could actually make their mental health worse?
I have been saying this about Ilene from the beginning.
She took her life while she was being affirmed, financially secure, receiving testosterone, and had a double mastectomy scheduled for free.
Her friends’ observations about her deteriorating mental state are documented in the detective report. And the autopsy showed new self-harm scars that had not been there before — another indication that she was struggling.
I cannot prove that testosterone caused Ilene to take her life. But I also cannot pretend that the timing means nothing.
She was on testosterone. Her friends had noticed changes in her mental state. The detective report documented those observations. The autopsy showed new self-harm scars. And now we have research showing that medical transition did not improve mental health in this large Finnish cohort and that, for some individuals, mental health appeared to deteriorate.
So I keep asking:
Why are we not taking this possibility seriously?
If hormones and medical interventions can have serious consequences for some young people, when are our laws going to change so that the adults and institutions who push vulnerable young people onto this path are held accountable?
Because these were children and young adults.
And there were adults around them — parents, schools, therapists, doctors, coaches, colleges, DCF, and clergy — who were supposed to protect them.
Who is accountable when “affirming” a young person means moving them toward irreversible decisions, and that young person ends up dead?
@pittparents@ethical_care@donoharm@EpochTimes@elonmusk@POTUS@realDailyWire@TPUSA@FoxNews@prageru@RobertKennedyJr@CivilRights@HarmeetKDhillon@EDSecMcMahon