Nobody can truly figure out the future revenue forecast for $ASTS yet.
Looking at future events, my assumptions are:
Announce launch schedule: $70
Get 1st 5 satellites in the air: $100
1st quarter of revenue: $120
2nd GEO revenue start: $150
And then we should have data…
@techinvestoor@REdebtlawyer The truth is…the bottleneck at this point is still the production cadence.
The launch capacity is actually still the secondary concern.
Probably most of my issue is I just don’t trust Elon.
@tuff_4r My 2 cents:
If it blows up, the stock goes below $50 and won’t see $80 for a LONG time.
If it doesn’t blow up, it stays about the same. Getting the satellites up is priced in. Everyone assumes they’re going to go up. Getting them up in a TIMELY basis is what’s weighing it…
@REdebtlawyer@techinvestoor The policy would change if their main D2D competition, in a space where they want to replace telcos, is temporarily single-sourced to SpaceX launches.
Elon isn’t a guy who plays by the rules.
@REdebtlawyer@techinvestoor I would suspect that after the launches on the already-signed contracts, they won’t do more.
When SpaceX was one of many providers, take the money. When they’re the only one— delay them.
@Nate_angling@disgusting_pleb How is that not already priced in?
The stock is at $80 but the assumption is they can’t get satellites off the ground?
It’ll be a little blip.
@max_williamson It’s a Double top, and it’s headed down.
I’m deep in the stock, but I don’t understand at all how a 3 satellite launch isn’t already priced in.
@ShawarmaCapital Your research is obviously crazy thorough. Are there any other Twitter accounts you’re following who mention $MRLN often (and credibly)?
@jon_d_conqueroo@spacanpanman ISRO is one at a time
No timeline exists on the others.
Blue Origin is down for 6 months, at least.
They had a two year lead. It’s down to one.
And I don’t know exactly how it will play out, but SpaceX isn’t going to allow them to build the full constellation.