@twithersCLE No. It’s about finding the best 22 to start offense and defense for this year. Coaches and players have a season to prepare for. This next year stuff is for the front office.
@923TheFan So, by this logic, if an older quarterback on the roster is judged to be the better player now, you should tell him and the other 52 players we're going to play the lesser QB so he's younger so we can "find out" if he's any good?
@tedcruz Fair enough. Reminds me of people like you being too terrified of Trump to disagree with him; even when he insults your spouse. You're all spineless power grifters.
@chubby2600 He's an actor. A performance artist. Probably thinks its ethical, good faith way to make a living since its just playacting. He and his ilk (on BOTH sides of the political aisle) will be remembered some day as just cheap, sideshow grifters. There's no honor in what he does.
@gtconway3d Astonishing that the apologists want to engage in legal technicalities and aren't troubled at all by the fact that our judicial system found the allegations credible. He told us he could shoot someone and his herd wouldn't care. Again, astonishing.
@ggreenwald Let's even allow for your point about contributing causes to the effect. Do you have evidence that this candidate has that kind of a nuanced understanding or does KISS apply here (hint: just more of the oppressor/oppressed omni explanation)?
@MrsErikaKirk Horseshit. This is what a decade of divisive politics does you grifting joke. Both sides contributed but there was one catalyst that lit the flame.
@mtaibbi Does the constitution have a voting “effort” threshold that we all missed? What a stupid thing to say. At least make cogent arguments unless youre just posting for clicks. Oh, I get it now..
@thedarkhorsepod One giant, convoluted narrative of a guy pretending to be a critical thinker simply to justify his "just so" view on election fraud. A mirror image of what alchemists would have said before chemists did actual, evidence-based thinking (i.e., science).
@BretWeinstein Snap out of it? Snap out of it says someone, fully schooled in the scientific method, for NOT accepting a just so statement without any evidence. Snap out of it is right, you just need a mirror. What happened to you?
@CGasparino Why keep asking the POTUS why he thinks all elections he loses are stolen? Seriously? We should just normalize this bullshit and move on? That's what you're suggesting as a journalist? F'ing comical.