@Matt_Pinner Realistically, how do could you reliably know that they’re unarmed? If you assume incorrectly, they can harm your family members in just a couple of quick moves. Best assume the worst and unload, because it’s ‘your’ families’ lives that are more valuable than the intruders.
@DougShootsStr8@EricLDaugh@Osinttechnical Really? If so, that’s the 2nd one dropped by the military while under Trumps command, right? Need more big 💥 boom. Gets the job done better.
@disclosetv@ThomasPaineBand BS. This video is from 2 ships that collided in 2025 and not from any recent IRGC attack on oil tankers. No American tanker has been fired on. You a$$-holes are so stupid because it takes AI less than 1 minute to determine your posts are lies.
https://t.co/U6UJvp79PL
@SubscriptPirate @realDonaldTrump Well, you know that over the past 5 or so years, Iran has become quite a bit more unruly. This is what happens when you leave belligerents to their own devices with no pressure to conform to standards. They start developing nukes and threatening to destroy whole populations.
@amiKozak@ComicDaveSmith@jordanbpeterson I feel like people who casually take part in some irrelevant foreign conflict rather than try to be more productive with their lives, even for minutes a day, are some form of tortured new wave hipsters. You took a side in the “hip war”, how worldly and opinionated you are.
@fricker@travelingflying@elonmusk It’s a simple pro vs. con equation. What’s in it for the US? What’s to lose? For the US, it seems that there’s more to lose by having belligerent allies dead set on steering into WW3, and cash to save in no longer subsidizing their defense. In fact the latter enables the former.
@lavinia_colzani@zindagibassapni@elonmusk I don’t really care about the arguments being made here for the moment, but I am interested to know how you determined that the reply was AI generated. Assuming you ran an analysis of some form on it, could you share the data with me?
@Bayazgg@EvanWorrell4WV@thefoodbabe@wvgovernor If the food “must” be colored in an unnatural way, and I dispute that it “must” be, then there would be some *possible* losses sustained, but also possible gains. That risk comes with any change of any commercial variable in nearly any situation. Looks like some exaggeration.
@ninaturner Nothing was said about social security. The idea that the article is trying to convey about it facing pressure, begs the question. Pressure from what? And what evidence do they have to back up that assertion? Do they have a hydraulic gauge, or is it because SS is insolvent?
@Eurisko67@kpac_15@johnndp Likely domestic production. If not, then I’m sure that the tequila flavored electricity from across the other border is not marked up like the maple syrup flavored brand to the north.
@Loki_Helmsdeep@steveinman Why would ‘not being a furry’ be a bad thing? “White Supreme” is my favorite way to dress a cauliflower pizza, so again, why is that bad, Sir?
@EvanWorrell4WV@thefoodbabe@wvgovernor That actually makes some sense, especially the supply chain and logistics angle.
My question is, why is red dye “necessary”, to the point that if removed from food and food production processes, would render them inedible, or inoperative respectively?