Today, Florida’s AG sued Pfizer for deceptive and unfair trade practices related to its Covid-19 vaccine, including for false claims regarding preventing transmission and claiming the vaccine is “safe.”
Here are the first two paragraphs of the complaint:
1“Those people are criminals.”
2So declared Albert Bourla—the chairman and CEO of pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc.—about Floridians who dared to voice safety concerns with Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine publicly. But as is often the case with those who resort to threats and censorship, it was Pfizer and Bourla who were violating the law, not the “criminals” they disparaged.
Full complaint: https://t.co/3KBIwtuUuD
“The head of infectious disease medicine at my hospital privately told me that he was working with the state government to restrict the civil rights of unvaccinated people.” - James P. Miller, MD
If democrats win this November in Pennsylvania,
they will mandate vaccinations with NO religious exemptions (just like democrats are doing in New York).
You’ll get Kathy Hochul in a suit.
On the topic of splitting up the MMR vaccine into 3 separate vaccines, everyone should know that in 2012, two Merck virologists came forward and explained that around 2005 when Merck sought to change the label on its MMR vaccine and approval for ProQuad (a combination MMR and varicella vaccine), it “falsely certified as having an efficacy rate that is significantly higher than it actually is.” (Complaint ¶ 1.)
As detailed in the whistleblower lawsuit, Merck obtained a license for its mumps vaccine in 1967. (Comp. ¶ 16.) In the late 1990s, to obtain approval for ProQuad and change the label on its MMR vaccine, Merck needed to reconfirm its claims of efficacy for its mumps vaccine made thirty years prior. (Comp.. ¶ 22.) Merck’s virologists working on testing the efficacy of the mumps vaccine revealed that after Merck could not demonstrate a 95% efficacy for its mumps vaccine, the results were simply fraudulently falsified to achieve this result. (Comp. ¶¶ 15-131.)
As explained by Merck’s virologists, Merck took blood samples pre-vaccinated with the mumps vaccine and then exposed them to the mumps virus. (Comp. ¶¶ 25-28.) When a test against a live strain of mumps would not yield a 95% efficacy, Merck tried to improperly obtain this rate using an attenuated strain of the mumps virus. (Comp. ¶¶ 29-30.) When this still would not achieve 95% efficacy, Merck tried different virus dilutions, different straining procedure, and even more liberal antibody counting techniques. (Comp. ¶¶ 31-32.) The Merck lab even improperly added animal antibodies to the blood samples and still could not achieve a 95% efficacy rate. (Comp. ¶¶ 33-39.)
When it was clear that even improper testing techniques could not produce the desired result, the test reports were simply falsified. (Comp. ¶¶ 40-51.) According to the Merck virologists, to document the desired efficacy rate, Merck destroyed result sheets and falsified various documents. (Id.) The Merck virologists claim this fraud was done with the direct authority and approval of Merck’s senior management. (Comp. ¶¶ 52-58.)
Now you know.
This may explain why outbreaks of mumps still regularly occur in highly vaccinated populations. See, e.g.:
https://t.co/YgTukQi0eg(317 cases; 89% had received at least 2 MMR doses); https://t.co/i7vsAVGixp(281 cases; high two-dose coverage among university-affiliated cases, with community spread); https://t.co/dKYuleKBM2(301 student cases; all patients with complications had received at least 2 doses); https://t.co/b4YB8ePKPG(42 cases; all patients had ≥2 documented MMR doses; campus two-dose coverage exceeded 99%); https://t.co/PtJBYPwsKt(29 cases; 76% had received the recommended 2 dose); https://t.co/W0IqwV4pZd(CDC: “experts aren’t sure why vaccinated people still get mumps…).
Complaint: https://t.co/hbnjc7YNfa
Peter Marks ran off the career vaccine experts at FDA and made himself, a cardiologist, the vaccine approval czar so the mandates could issue. He did not get a pardon. Prosecute that son of a bitch.
Pennsylvania's Governor and PA’s Department of Health are proposing a rights-crushing power grab. Deadline to submit a comment is September 21, 2026!
This regulation would, for example, permit health authorities to meet and speak privately with a student, permit accessing patient medical records, and authorize surveillance, segregation, and quarantine.
Comments must be EMAILED to: [email protected] and [email protected] (Your email should use this subject line: Rulemaking #10-242: Communicable and Noncommunicable Diseases; IRRC #3490)
Regulations: https://t.co/wGSg4mq6Su
Were you or your family member affected by mandated Covid hospital protocols? @SenRonJohnson's office wants to hear from you. This includes:
-Families who lost loved ones under hospital protocols
- Patients or families whose requests for alternative or Right to Try treatments were denied
- Physicians, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who were prevented from exercising their medical judgment
- Healthcare workers who witnessed harmful protocols, coercion, or the denial of requested treatment
Submit your story here no later than Monday, September 7th: https://t.co/QzvSJFyJC3
@erinkoper If anything it will be easier for the defense to get a win. All they need is the new jury that is 100% blue this time. It’s not that hard in the state.
@GovernorShapiro You held a press conference said two unvaccinated children died of measles.
One died from a ruptured spleen at birth. One was on palliative care upon birth (unrelated to measles).
You politicized these tragic deaths.
It is demonic that you are doing this and doubling down.
Now that the second Pennsylvania death has been revealed, it is clear that Gov. Shapiro's press conference (& the media coverage) was misleading.
1. Gov. Shapiro used the term "unvaccinated" to describe the two. But neither child was eligible for the MMR vaccine. The boy died right after birth, and the girl at 6 weeks.
2. Gov. Shapiro stated that the deaths were preventable. This does not appear to be the case. All the facts are not known, but the best current evidence suggests the boy likely died from trauma from delivery or resuscitation, not measles. The girl had Amish Lethal Microcephaly, a condition that virtually always results in death in the first months of life. Calling her death “preventable” was misleading in that it strongly implied she would otherwise have survived infancy (and, again, she wouldn't have been vaccinated at that age.)
When Gov. Shapiro mentioned two "unvaccinated" individuals whose deaths were "completely preventable," how many listeners thought one would be a newborn with a traumatic rupture of the spleen & the other a six-week-old with a severe genetic condition that's lethal in the first few months of life?
The natural impression was that Gov. Shapiro was referring to two vaccine-eligible people who died from measles because they declined vaccination.
Gov. Shapiro (and the media) should apologize & publicly correct the record. The public has lost trust in health officials & the press because of misleading announcements and news coverage. This incident has only heightened that loss of trust. https://t.co/z4XuhH1NR0
The cause of death was a "traumatic laceration of the spleen" the coroner said.
I have been delivering babies for 31 years & have had my share of difficult deliveries. What happened during the delivery matters and I would expect the coroner and pathologist were aware of the clinical history.
This word choice "traumatic laceration" suggests to me that they are confident the splenic injury was caused by trauma.
There is little information so I am speculating, but if this was a difficult breech delivery, for example, & it was very hard to get the baby out, and multiple maneuvers were needed, & they found a laceration on the spleen - that would be reason to declare the cause of death "traumatic laceration of the spleen" and also to state that measles was not a contributing factor.
So the delivery events do matter.
But whatever the delivery events, Gov. Shapiro & the media misled the public & did a grave disservice to the mother. https://t.co/yltPmuTOQX
Additional facts coming out about the two deaths in Lancaster:
1. One of the deaths claimed to be “measles-associated” by the state was the death of a newborn male on August 14th. The baby’s spleen was lacerated, according to coroner, Dr. Stephen Diamantoni. The coroner ruled out measles as even a contributing factor because “there was no swelling or enlargement whatsoever” of the baby’s spleen and there was “massive blood loss.”*
2. The newborn’s mother is alive, and she was not the second death claimed to be “measles-associated.”
3. The coroner has no information about the second purported “measles-associated” death announced by the state. It’s possible he has not yet received the information, but eventually will. It’s also possible the individual died in a different county. The coroner says the law requires the death be reported to his office.
Additional thought on these facts:
This is not the first time that a purposeful release of limited, misleading, and/or false information by health authorities is used to fear monger and cast blame and judgement on those who decline one or more vaccine products. Think back to the two “measles deaths” in Texas, claimed last year, and ask yourself how much quicker we would have learned the truth there if we had someone like PA’s Commissioner, Josh Parsons, pulling back the curtain in live time. With the information we were able to eventually obtain, we concluded that neither of those deaths were measles deaths either.** This didn’t and doesn’t stop the media or health authorities from “claiming” these two deaths as measles deaths. Maybe this time around, with Commissioner Parsons peeling back the curtain in real time, we may get a somewhat different outcome.
* https://t.co/HWd015xnhu
** https://t.co/4lSTjoufKO