PaggyFezza

[David Atherton @daveatherton]

Hi @lowles_nick is this a screenshot of your hit piece on Ann Widdecombe? Was her murderer a fan of yours, a subscriber to @hopenothate?

Not only have you taken the piece down, you've also removed it from being tracked down as an archive.

I suggest you rename HNH as "Hate."

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

Eat a mouthful of grass and you get nothing. It goes in green and comes out green.

Eat straw and you get nothing. Your gut cannot touch cellulose.

Eat acorns and you get tannins, and a very bad afternoon.

Eat bracken and you get a carcinogen.

Eat nettles, thistles, brambles, rushes and moorland heather and you get a mouth full of blood and no calories.

Eat the beet pulp, the oat husks and the spent brewer's grain and you get the waste the factory couldn't sell.

Now feed the lot of it to a cow.

She turns every one of them into steak, butter, cream, milk and a hide, on land that will never grow a vegetable, using four stomachs and a fermentation vat you do not have.

The grass she eats grew on rain and sunlight, for free, on a hillside nobody can plough.

She is the only creature on earth that can take a field of inedible fibre and hand you back the most nutrient-dense food there is.

The cow is not competing with you for food. She eats the ninety percent you cannot.

Best plant-based diet ever invented. It just has a cow in the middle doing the hard part.

[Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧 @EssexPR]

The boy that was thrown into the crocodile enclosure, has so far had 7 operations and still may have limbs amputated 😔

[PaggyFezza @Pagani_Ferrari]

@Con_Tomlinson Physiognomy strikes again.

[PaggyFezza @Pagani_Ferrari]

@Robbie_Reasons And she probably had her case 100% funded by taxpayer funded Legal Aid

[Kiera Diss @KieraDiss]

“THERE’S ONE OF ME AND FIVE OF YOU!”

An alleged incident between kids in a Dagenham park the day prior led to this confrontation when five adult men who accosted two women and their children.

The attitude simmered when Dad turned up on the scene but it only took two minutes for the mask to slip and one threatened violence.

Why should a British family have to deal with this?

He stood his ground, good man.

[PaggyFezza @Pagani_Ferrari]

@PutneyFleur Can we just jetwash the disgusting pavement outside putney station and sort some litter picking for wandsworth park? Like, local stuff rather than worrying about Sudan?

[PaggyFezza @Pagani_Ferrari]

@MartinKnight_ Just a shame that a house in St. Helier costs about £4m.

[PaggyFezza @Pagani_Ferrari]

@UnityNewsNet June Fucking Sarpong???

Fuck this country 😤

[Robert Jenrick @RobertJenrick]

Kiran Kaur will serve less jail time than Lucy Conolly due to a shocking two-tier loophole.

The mother of Henry Novak’s murderer got three years today for hiding the weapon her son used to repeatedly stab Henry Novak to death.

She would normally serve just 40% of that sentence due to early release rules. But it gets worse…

Buried in the judgment, the judge says Kaur may qualify for “Home Detention Curfew”. That means on top of her early release, she can be released on house arrest 180 days before the 40% point.

Put simply, Kiran Kaur will serve just 8 months for her role in Henry’s murder.

To put that into context, Lucy Conolly served over 10 months for one badly worded tweet. Unlike Kaur, she was told that her offence made her “presumed-unsuitable” for house arrest.

I’m sorry. But this looks like another case of two-tier justice to me.

Kaur conspired with her son as he sought to smear Henry as racist he lay dying on the street.

Frankly — as an Indian national — she should be deported to serve a very lengthy sentence in her country of origin.

But to let her off with house arrest, when it was denied to others, would be an outrage.

[Kiera Diss @KieraDiss]

“YOU CAN PUT THAT BACK IN THE CAR NOW!”

This fly-tipping taxi was caught red handed dumping a boot load on the side of the road.

He simply drives off but not before his licences and registration numbers were recorded.

Not a good look for Western Cars in Derby.

[Laila Cunningham @policylaila]

This is truly shocking. 77 visa sponsors on one road and just look at it.

How is the Home Office allowing these businesses to hold sponsor licences for ‘skilled workers’? London should be attracting the best and brightest, this is far from it.

[Katie Lam @Katie_Lam_MP]

The Government's trade deal with India will mean that it's cheaper to hire an Indian worker than a British one.

And amazingly, they've just made it even worse.

Most other countries are perfectly happy to strike trade deals without forcing us to undercut our own workforce. We should have expected India to do the same.

Instead, under the terms of our Free Trade Agreement with India, Indian companies will be able to transfer their workers to this country more easily.

Once they're here, those workers will be able to avoid National Insurance payments for up to five years. The same is true for employers. Previously, that exemption applied for three years - which was already bad enough.

Instead, both employee and employer will pay into the Indian social security system instead.

This National Insurance exemption will make it much cheaper to hire Indian workers, in fields like IT and engineering, than to hire domestic talent.

Let's imagine a British IT firm, set to hire a computer programmer for £60,000 a year. To hire them, an employer needs to spend £60,000 a year on their salary, plus £8,250 on Employer National Insurance. That's a total of £68,250.

An Indian competitor with an office in London, meanwhile, can save money by transferring Indian workers to the UK, even if they pay the same headline salary.

They’d still spend £60,000 on the salary - but instead of paying National Insurance, they pay into the Indian Employee Provident Fund instead. Mandatory contributions to the fund are capped at 15,000 rupees a month, or about £120.

That means that, across a year, an employer only pays £1,470 into the social security system - for a total of £61,470.

So under this Government's deal, it would be at least 10 percent cheaper to hire an Indian worker over a British one for this job. This is absurd.

Over five years, it would be nearly £34,000 cheaper for an Indian firm to bring over an Indian worker to London than to hire locally.

The reason for this absurd arrangement is that the India deal includes a Double Contribution Convention. DCCs make it easier for international companies to transfer their workforce. They're designed to stop highly-skilled workers from paying into two different social security systems.

We already have Double Contribution Conventions with other countries. However, these other countries tend to be either:

(1) roughly as developed as the UK - in the case of countries like Canada or Japan, or
(2) very small - in the case of countries like Jamaica.

India is by far the poorest country on the list, and by far the largest. The net result of this deal will be more Indian workers in fields like IT and engineering, undercutting British workers.

Given the relative markets in the UK and in India, we shouldn't expect this to automatically be a like-for-like swap in terms of talent.

We've seen this happen in the US already, with Indian consultancies leasing their workers to American companies, who are then able to pay an Indian worker far less than they'd need to pay an American.

The result has been a massive expansion in the number of lower-cost Indian workers, at the expense of American workers.

We should not be allowing other countries to dictate the terms of our migration system, in exchange for some trade benefits at the margins. If India wants to trade, then we should trade. Migration shouldn't even come into the equation.

[max tempers @maxtempers]

The judge accepts that it's not in the public interest because the family (a) does not meet the immigration rules, (b) cannot speak English, and (c) would require public funds, but decides that the mental health impact on the Gazan woman in the UK outweighs the public interest.

[Chris Philp MP @CPhilpOfficial]

Shocking that an extended family of 18 from Gaza has been given the right to come to the UK because of ONE relative here

They will all be eligible for immediate benefits and social housing

Needless to say it was on ECHR human rights grounds

Another reason to leave the ECHR

[PaggyFezza @Pagani_Ferrari]

@JamesPGoddard90 I hope they get moved to a big free house next to the judge so she can rue that decision herself.

[James Goddard @JamesPGoddard90]

18 MUSLIMS WIN THE RIGHT TO MOVE TO BRITAIN THANKS TO IMMIGRATION JUDGE GEMMA LOUGHRAN

The case was brought after a Gazan-born mother-of-three - who came to the UK as a refugee and is now a British citizen – was refused permission to bring her extended family into this country.

Her relatives – both parents; a brother, his wife and four children; a sister and four children; and another sister, her husband and three children – won a legal challenge on human rights grounds.

The Palestinians argued they had a 'right to family life' under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and won their case under Section 6 of the Act which sets out how it is 'unlawful for a public authority to act in a way which is incompatible with a Convention right'.

The ruling showed most of the adult applicants could not speak English and that the UK-based sister would only be able to accommodate her parents.

The whole family was granted anonymity by the courts. This is the same Judge that ruled a hairy asylum
seeker with a beard is a child

[PaggyFezza @Pagani_Ferrari]

@TiceRichard A very small number of Gazans can destroy an entire country, which is why nowhere in the middle east will take them in. Look at Jordan and Lebanon.

[PaggyFezza @Pagani_Ferrari]

@tesssummers98 @TiceRichard Judge Gemma? That's a joke right there. Have you ever met a Gemma with an IQ over 90?

[Merryn Somerset Webb @MerrynSW]

Give the Boriswave - 1.6m migrants - the right to settle permanently in the UK after 5 years and the cost is £30bn. It would have been cheaper to pay the unemployed already in the UK £150k plus each a year each to do the care work. Incentives etc.