✈️ Dear @Fly_Airlink THIS IS DAYLIGHT ROBBERY😕😡 🚨
I’m writing this to publicly expose what I experienced with your airline, because this cannot be normal or acceptable.
I booked my flight 2 months in advance, everything paid, everything confirmed. I arrive at the airport thinking it’s a smooth check-in… only to be told there’s an "issue" with my name on your system apparently it only showed my initials and surname instead of my full names.
Now here’s the shocking part…
Instead of simply verifying my identity (which I had FULL proof of ID AND passport in hand), your staff decided the solution was to charge me R790 just to "edit" my name on your own system error.
Let that sink in…
👉 YOUR system error
👉 MY money
And I say that because I booked with my full names and your staff said maybe it's because my names are long..
I even escalated the matter to the supervisor on duty, expecting some level of professionalism or assistance… but instead, she showed zero willingness to help and proceeded to enforce this ridiculous charge like it’s normal practice.
How do you justify charging a customer R790 for something that and paying huge sums of rands to book my flights, something that
• Was NOT my fault
• Could be verified instantly with official documents
• Took literally seconds to fix
This is not customer service, this is exploitation, in fact u stealing from us.
We are already paying high ticket prices, and now we must budget extra for your internal mistakes too? 😭
I am formally demanding a full refund of R790 back into my account within 24 hours.
You cannot continue taking people’s hard-earned money under the guise of "policies" when the fault lies entirely with your own system.
If this is not resolved urgently, I will have no choice but to escalate this matter further through the relevant consumer protection channels and publicly pursue accountability.
Do the right thing. Also check your Emails because this same tweet is on your emails
Mxm📍
Ye originally wanted Lauryn Hill on “All Falls Down” in 2004 as it interpolates her song “Mystery of Iniquity,” but he couldn’t get the sample cleared at the time
Two decades later he brings her out to perform it together for the first time in front of a sold-out crowd of 80,000 fans 🔥🔥🔥
LEGENDARY 🤯
Still the best punchline! "I was minding my business in KZN..." 😁
They really shouldn't have poked the bear in the eye because around here, we don't start what we won't finish‼️
#Mkhwanazi#MadlangaCommission#AdHocCommittee
#AdHocCommittee
Whistleblower Patricia Mashale presented a 2019 audio recording from Sifiso Meyiwa.
In the recording, suspended NPA advocate Andrew Chauke is allegedly heard admitting that the NPA does not believe the men currently on trial were responsible for killing Senzo Meyiwa.
Madame Baloyi you are such a queen please share your secret Mam , The commissioner are now beating him in his game,Every implicated new witness will try this tactic .
Mr Laywer is singing for his supper ,et us proceed. We can't stop because he has applied. He can join us later on... Also, he didn't answer what Khumalo asked him. Waffled all over #MadlangaCommision
Wife loses claim to husband’s R2.3 million pension after affair and child outside marriage
A Gauteng High Court has ruled that a woman must forfeit her claim to her estranged husband’s R2.3 million pension fund after finding that her conduct during the marriage constituted substantial misconduct.
The ruling, delivered by Judge Noluntu Bam at the North Gauteng High Court, stems from divorce proceedings in which the husband successfully argued that his wife’s extramarital affair with his friend and the subsequent birth of a child with another man justified excluding her from sharing in his pension benefits.
Married in community of property in 2011, the couple had lived apart since 2020 and agreed their marriage had irretrievably broken down. They also agreed to divide their joint estate equally except for the pension, which the husband sought to protect, citing his wife’s conduct.
During the trial, the court heard that the wife had been unemployed throughout the marriage and engaged in a romantic relationship with one of her husband’s friends while they were still living together.
The husband testified he later discovered via a Facebook baby‑shower post that she had given birth to a third child with another man, a revelation the judge described as humiliating for him.
Judge Bam accepted the husband’s account and found that allowing the wife to benefit from the pension would amount to an undue advantage, particularly given her new relationship and independence from the marriage.
In reaching her decision, the judge noted that the wife’s conduct including procreating with a third party and publicising it amounted to substantial misconduct under Section 9 of the Divorce Act, which permits forfeiture orders when one party would be unduly benefited without them.
The court granted the divorce, ordered an equal division of the joint estate excluding the pension benefits, and made provisions for care and maintenance of the minor children. Each party was ordered to pay their own legal costs.