Pamary

Conservative left with no choice but to leave the republican party.
Christian that loves Jesus! CIK
Iesus (Christus) Nazarenus, Rex Iudaeorum

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@FoxNews He can do a rally everyday but he will not convince all the conservatives walking away to vote. The lies and promises NOT kept by Trump will be remembered long after the midterms and 2028.

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@AndrewKolvet Wow Andrew, really? I feel sorry for your children who will one day realize that their Dad is a lying sob and was complicit in Charlies death. Not only do the people that loved Charlie think you are disgusting your children will too.

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@TomFitton @JudicialWatch @realDonaldTrump Because it was a setup, just like Cole Thomas Allen and Tyler Robinson.

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@NihiloX @lisaknows429 If you believe there is fraud, report to gofundme and they will investigate before releasing any funds.

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@RealCandaceO My child would not be attending school on that day.

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@CarriePrejean1 My child would not be attending school on that day.

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@RepRalphNorman Just another reason I won't be votining in the midterms or 2028 at this point. When they lose because of low turn out, maybe they will start listening.

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@GenFlynn They will lose bigly. Many conservatives will be sitting out the midterms. And it is Trumps fault.

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@stephenasmith

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@FoxNews Yet they had no problem going back there for the 1 year anniversary. smh

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@SpeakerJohnson Then release the Epstein files and fulfill ALL the 2024 campaign promises. Time is ticking and not in your favor.

[Muppet Masher @MuppetMasher]

Just remember
*They haven't match the suspect to the crime scene.
*They can't match the bullet to the gun.
*They can't place the gun on the roof.
*They can't link the screwdriver to the roof.
*They can't explain the degraded DNA.
*They can't explain the dust in the barrel.
*They can't explain the flipped CCTV video in the staircase.
*They can't explain the timeline.
*They can't explain the jump cuts.
*They can't explain the .223 bullet found on another rooftop.
*They can't explain the backpack at the bus stop.
*They can't explain who from TPUSA met the suspect earlier that day.
They can't explain how he's guilty beyond reasonable doubt however they will keep telling you he is...
We will continue to work on the premise he's innocent until proven guilty.

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@RepBenCline @HouseGOP For too long the Epstein Files have been covered up. Join the others and let them know you are NOT afraid.

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@RepThomasMassie @RepRalphNorman @RepBenCline now is your chance to do what is right. We are ready to let Virginia know exactly what kind of morals you have or don't have. November will not be kind if you choose to be silent.

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@RealCandaceO Haha look at Blakey in his "Just for Men" era. That facial hair is looking a little fakey blakey black.

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@JDVance

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@Davidengelhardt @rhowardbrowne @MrsErikaKirk 🤣🤣🤣

[John Mappin @JohnMappin]

The Most Difficult Kind of Love

By John Mappin | IF Magazine

There is a peculiar modern belief that love requires silence.

If you love someone, apparently, you must never contradict them. Never ask the uncomfortable question. Never disturb the convenient consensus. The loving friend nods sympathetically; the troublesome friend insists upon knowing what actually happened.

It is a wonderfully comfortable doctrine.

It is also not Christianity.

Christian love — agape — is something altogether more formidable. It is not mere affection, nor politeness, nor the avoidance of offence. It is the willing of the true good of another human being, irrespective of the cost to oneself.

And Christianity makes an extraordinary claim about that good:

It cannot ultimately be separated from truth.

St Paul could hardly have put it more precisely: love “rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth.”

That, I believe, is the proper Christian lens through which to understand what Candace Owens @RealCandaceO is doing.

Her purpose, as I understand it, is more precise than simply “asking questions.”

It is to establish the truth about the death of Charlie Kirk wherever she believes that truth remains incomplete, obscured or unresolved; to honour the obligation she feels towards her dead friend; and, by bringing what is hidden into the light, to serve the living people who remain behind.

That is the purpose.

Her criticism of Erika, where it occurs, is not the purpose. It is incidental to it.

This distinction is absolutely essential.

Candace is not pursuing Erika. She is pursuing truth. If that pursuit sometimes requires her to challenge something Erika has said, believed or been told, then the challenge is a consequence of the mission, not its object.

And that mission is, at its heart, one of fidelity.

Fidelity to Charlie.

Fidelity to conscience.

Fidelity to the proposition that the truth about a human life does not cease to matter when that life ends.

Candace loved Charlie Kirk. Death does not cancel the obligations of friendship. In the Christian understanding, it deepens them.

She cannot now protect Charlie in the ordinary sense. She cannot telephone him, counsel him, warn him or stand beside him.

But she can refuse to permit unanswered questions concerning his death simply to disappear into the fog of public memory.

She can remember.

She can investigate.

She can speak.

And she can insist that what is true matters more than what is convenient.

This is where her purpose becomes unmistakably Christian in character.

Christianity is a religion of revelation. Its movement is perpetually from concealment towards disclosure, from darkness towards light.

“For every one that doeth evil hateth the light,” says Christ, “neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.”

Candace’s purpose, understood in its highest form, is precisely this movement towards the light.

Not to manufacture a predetermined answer.

Not to condemn somebody in advance.

But to bring everything that can be known into the light and allow truth to reveal itself.

That is very different from accusation.

It is discernment.

And Christian discernment is not passive.

The command to “prove all things; hold fast that which is good” requires examination. It requires discrimination. It requires the courage to distinguish what merely appears to be true from what actually is true.

That process can be uncomfortable.

It can even wound.

But Scripture has a phrase for this too: “Faithful are the wounds of a friend.”

This becomes particularly important when we consider Erika.

If Candace believes Erika herself may not possess the whole truth about circumstances surrounding Charlie’s death, then Candace’s purpose is not ultimately to defeat Erika in an argument.

It is to discover whatever truth Erika herself deserves to know.

That completely changes the moral geometry.
@piersmorgan @PiersUncensored @RealAlexJones

[John Mappin @JohnMappin]

Part 2

Candace @RealCandaceO is not necessarily standing opposite Erika.

She may, in the deepest sense, be standing for her.

She may be carrying a burden which Erika, for perfectly understandable reasons, cannot presently carry herself: the burden of relentless inquiry.

“Bear ye one another’s burdens,” writes St Paul, “and so fulfil the law of Christ.”

Sometimes carrying another person’s burden means consoling them.

But sometimes it means doing something much harder.

Looking where they cannot look.

Asking what they cannot ask.

Going where grief, circumstance or responsibility prevents them from going.

And accepting the hostility which comes with doing so.

This is why I believe it is inadequate to describe Candace merely as a critic.

A critic comments from the sidelines.

Candace sees herself, rather, as having an obligation.

Her purpose is testimony.

She is bearing witness to the conviction that Charlie mattered, that the truth about his death matters, and that friendship does not expire at the grave.

And she is prepared to pay a price for that conviction.

There is something profoundly Christian in this.

“Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.”

There are many things short of life itself which a person can lay down.

Reputation.

Comfort.

Popularity.

Friendships.

The approval of one’s own tribe.

The luxury of remaining silent.

Sacrificial love begins wherever somebody willingly accepts a cost for the good of another.

And this, finally, is how I understand Candace’s purpose.

To honour Charlie through truth.

To serve the living by bringing what can be known into the light.

To refuse the comfortable silence which would require her to betray her conscience.

And, ultimately, to trust the profoundly Christian proposition that nobody who genuinely loves another person need ever fear the truth.

That is why criticism of Erika, when it occurs, should not be mistaken for Candace’s destination.

Erika is not the destination.

Vindication is not the destination.

Controversy is certainly not the destination.

Truth is the destination.

And if Candace is prepared to endure misunderstanding, hostility and personal cost in order to reach it, then what we are watching may be considerably more than journalism or commentary.

It may be vocation.

It may be service.

It may, in the oldest and most demanding Christian sense of the words, be an act of love.

@piersmorgan @PiersUncensored @RealAlexJones

[Pamary @Pamary47]

@seanhannity The democrats are not getting nervous, you are. They already know that Trump has lost hundreds of thousands of his base because of Israel, not releasing ALL the Epstein files and the Charlie Kirk assassination cover-up. Republicans will lose this time around.