Explain to me how you can still follow and reply to @monad KOLs who spend their days shitposting or bullposting, when everyone can clearly see the project is going through a rough patch. I’m not saying Monad won’t become important, they have everything they need to bounce back, but let’s stop pretending nothing has been happening over the past few weeks.
After talking with several of these KOLs and seeing their ridiculous bullposts, I always come to the same conclusion: either they’re hoping to work in the ecosystem someday, they’re completely in denial, or they simply want to pump their bags. And after that, we’re supposed to trust them when they talk about another project? Seriously? Their credibility is nonexistent.
Telling their followers that “everything is amazing” and “everything is under control” right now is pure dishonesty. The least they could do is adopt a more measured, neutral tone. Before the airdrop, I understood the game: flattering Monad to increase the chances of getting a role. Fine. But continuing this kind of messaging now is just disrespectful to their community.
Don’t let yourselves be manipulated. Do your own research, look at the facts, compare projects. Listen to people who are involved in a project, but also to those who aren’t, understanding why some chose not to invest is often more insightful than any bullpost.
You may agree or disagree with me, that’s normal. But always ask yourself: why is someone posting this message? For what purpose? Are they working on a project within the ecosystem (dApps / NFT)? And most importantly, do they objectively explain what led them to this analysis rather than another?
@Capetlevrai La collection NFT et le memecoin les plus attendus sur la blockchain, c’est @ChogNFT. Le memecoin devrait launch aujourd'hui et le NFT plus tard en décembre. Mais il est vrai que pour le moment c'est un peu calme.
@wagmigently Forget things? Well, that’s just typical you. You even "forgot" to update your MONAD MINTS file... You know, the one with only your buddies in it.
@primeairdropsx I wouldn’t be as harsh as you. I think there’s an important part of the community that’s genuinely building, being serious, and trying to do things right. People judge whether a product is good or not just by looking at the charts.
Monad’s tokenomics shows that about 1.4% of the FDV was not claimed during the airdrop. The team decided to redistribute these tokens into Ecosystem Development. However, they could have really satisfied the community by redistributing them to the community, which would have significantly improved the overall sentiment. What do you think? @monad
@Sifat551 I came to the same conclusion as you. They could have redistributed the unclaimed portion. My latest post on X shows what the allocations would have looked like, and I have to admit, it would have significantly changed how everyone feels about it.
@ourgamesucks Yeah, it’s about time to move on. Now that the tokenomics is out, there’s nothing new to learn. Hopefully next time I talk about it, it’ll be to celebrate the token going past $0.10 per $MON.