Paras Jain

Advocate & Founder @WHIPOffical

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

When Court has dismissed the application to stay its recommendation given on administrative side, DHCBA has chosen to call strike impacting all litigants and lawyers.

I am hopeful DHCBA will call off strike and resolve the issue promptly. (2/2)

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

Coordination Committee of Delhi District Courts has given detailed representation to the Chief Justice of DHC, explaining reasons for enhancing pecuniary jurisdiction of Delhi District Courts from 2 Cr to 20 Cr

DHCBA has not given any detailed representation to counter. (1/2)

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

In most of neighbouring states, Pecuniary Jurisdiction of District Courts is unlimited.

Coordination Committee of Delhi District Courts must hold ground for unlimited Pecuniary jurisdiction instead of 20 Cr.

In past also, DHCBA opposed the enhancement from 20 Lac to 2 Cr

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

Another scene shows how Judge disrespects an advocate in open court when he does not address the Judge with “My Lord” and “Lordship”.

People will get to watch more such movies from South on judicial corruption in time to come. (2/2)

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

Tamil Film #Karuppu exposes judicial corruption.

Madras High Court has admitted that system has corrupt judges while not putting ban & allows safe release of the film.

One scene shows how a Judge keeps on delaying the matter by giving dates and dates without any reason (1/2)

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

Access to Affordability for Answer-Scripts under #RTI.

12 years to the legal battle fought in Delhi High Court.

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

Anil Sood who claims himself as Indirect Tax Consultant, has given unconditional apology for writing demeaning social media posts.

Those posts were deleted by him later as injunction order for deletion was passed by the Court.

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

DHCBA should call a meeting of its members to seek voting on enhancing Pecuniary Jurisdiction of Delhi District Courts from 2 Cr to 20 Cr.

Mostly members will support enhancement as it will benefit large number of members practising in both District Courts and Delhi High Court

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

In 2013, DHCBA opposed pecuniary jurisdiction enhancement from 20 Lac to 2 Cr.

Today, same opposition for 2 Cr to 20 Cr.

I am hopeful DHCBA will keep larger public interest and litigants interest in mind afterall “Courts are for People, People are not for Courts”.

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

Single litigation enables now 43 Lacs students to access their answer-scripts under #RTI.

@WHIPOffical

[Whistle For Public Interest- WHIP @WHIPOffical]

In 2016, @WHIPOffical moved a contempt plea against CBSE for denying examinees access to answer-scripts under RTI

#CBSE was charging Rs 1200 per subject from examinees in contrary to Rs 2 per page as per RTI Rules (1/2)

https://t.co/38SNbg95jZ

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

#Cockroach enters Lokpal and got this information.

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

Saket Court Bar Association strongly condemns DHCBA Opposition to enhancement of Pecuniary Jurisdiction of Delhi District Courts from 2 Cr to 20 Cr.

DHCBA is yet to justify its opposition and its strike against such enhancement.

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

Delhi District Bar Associations have given number of positive points to support increase in Pecuniary Jurisdiction from 2 Cr to 20 Cr.

Hope DHCBA will give atleast #One reason to oppose this.

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

I have always supported the campaign of video recording of court proceedings of Gulshan Pahuja since 2014.

But if any person reads complete judgment holding him of contempt by DHC, no judicial mind will tolerate this language.

He should apologise.

He is good person.

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

If Judicial Services Association of Delhi is seriously concerned about the dignity of the judges, they should immediately demand recording of the court proceedings in all District Courts of Delhi.

Why to hide anything in open court.

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

An old report but still finds its relevance considering the yesterday’s misbehaviour of a Judge with a Senior Member and President of Bar Association of Rohini Court, Delhi.

Delhi District Bar Associations must also pass this similar resolution unanimously.

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

Last month also, one Judicial member in Rohini Court misbehaved with advocates which led the Bar Association to boycott the court for one week. Only after intervention of DHC Judges, it resumed. (2/2)

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

Today’s clash between Bar Association President and a Judge in Rohini Court, exhibits something which Delhi High Court must take serious note of it and take necessary steps to strengthen mutual respect between the Bar Members and the Judicial members. (1/2)

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

#Cockroaches are doing their good job.

We should fear from the snakes 🐍

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

DHC incurred 7 Cr. Rs in setting up Digital Courts in Rouse Avenue Court, which now have shifted back to Physical Court

Had DHC consulted with Bar Associations before taking decision, 7 Cr. could have been utilised for improving digital infrastructure in District Courts (1/2)

[Paras Jain @ParasRTI]

Digital Courts setup under NI Act in Delhi have become defunct.

Without giving digital infrastructure to District Courts-Rohini, Saket, Karkardooma, Dwarka, Patiala House, Tis Hazari, all digital courts were shifted to Rouse Avenue Court. (1/2)