The most cancerous rhetoric I keep seeing on this app is that "you're 1 trade away from changing your life"
This mentality is no different to the people you'd consider retards for buying lottery tickets. Except with the lottery at least you have a rough idea of your winning odds
A fundamental requirement of profitable trading is repetitive execution of an edge. Sample size. Not relying on one trade to escape the permanent underclass
But alas there will be one example of sometime winning the lottery and the timeline parading it as a triumph with the justification that you can do it too
Before you donate your money to your favorite KOL, ask yourself why you're even here
Do you want to be rich? Or do you want to be a trader?
Because I promise you there are easier ways to get rich.
The past 2 months I've been obsessing over how go maximise the EV of my positions
What do the best setups look like?
How can I minimise my losing trades?
How can I maximise my winning trades?
Figuring out how to add to winners has been the hardest by a margin
From my experience, adding to any position just because it's "going in your favor" is kinda sloppy
The secret sauce is only adding to positions that instantly let you know you're very correct
@PickeeP29@0xaporia@blknoiz06 “If it falls DCA”
What if it keeps falling lol
The value of trend is that your inval is the break of the trend
What’s your inval if the reason for entering is that price is “cheap”
Bearish on reading comprehension because CT doesn't understand what the word 'downside' means
People getting defensive over an objective truth about liquidity constraints
the downside to memecoins that no one talks about is that it is an unscalable skill
even if you are a top trencher it only gets you to low-mid 7 figs
the skills also dont translate over to perps which is the endgame because its infinitely scalable
On what it means to trade
“Repeatedly entering +EV positions with good risk management”
1. +EV positioning
Price action (“what”) > Order flow (“how”) > Context (“why”)
You need an edge. Fortunately it’s the easiest part because what makes money in markets isn’t a secret anymore, basically just abuse trend/momo effects and you’ll be fine
EV = (% win * R of avg win) - (% loss * R of avg loss). This tells you the avg unit of risk you can expect to gain/loss per trade
Price action — Eg: to trade momo, it actually needs to exist on the chart. Typical indicators like RSI/MACD are just derivatives of PA to easily quantify the existence of these effects
Order flow — It’s wise to check if the move is backed by meaningful volume/aggressive buying (good momo rallies need ‘activation energy’ to shift the regime). Study the CVDs of recent crime coins (BANK, SYN, LAB etc.) and the pattern isn’t hard to spot
Context — intuition, narrative, market regimes etc. is largely discretionary and honed overtime, but is the difference between mid and supernatural returns imo
2. Good risk management
Invalidation > Position sizing > Tail-risk
Invalidation — Defines where the position is wrong. Good invals have 3 characteristics:
- discrete/objective
- relatively close to entry
- direct rejection of the reason you entered
Eg: breakout trading enters at a confirmed close/break of a discrete level, inval is a close below that level
The objectivity of an inval is important because it prevents you from psyoping yourself into holding a losing position. One of reasons trend trading > mean-rev for retail, very easy to hold a losing mean-rev position when price going against you further reinforces the reason you entered the first place
Position sizing — Two things to know:
- How much risk your strategy can stomach
- How much risk your stomach can stomach
You can guesstimate the first by doing some back-of-envelope EV and Kelly ratio calcs. Be pessimistic and half the number
The second is personal, if you’re in crypto you’re probably fried so this won’t be your bottleneck
Tail-risk — people forget it exists until their account no longer does. How to mitigate depends on trading style but there are 2 simple ways, especially if you’re swing trading shitters:
- Always have a hard stop
- Never full-port your margin
Sometimes even a hard stop will not save you (study 10/10) so the latter is generally wiser
3. Repetition
Systemisation > Conviction > Patience
Systemisation — you can’t repeat what isn’t systemised. You need hard rules to define your filters, sizing, entry and exit conditions. You don’t need be a quant but the more discretionary your trading is the harder being consistent will be
Conviction — you need to keep clicking even when it hurts, which it will. There is no shortcut for building it, you kinda just need to believe. It can be data-driven (weakest), from building the systems with your own hands, to making money with it yourself (strongest)
Patience — edge needs reps to make money (if you have one, most don’t so “trade less” is unironically good advice). Lots of fear-mongering about “time running out” to make money, it’s largely psyops, as long as people build the infra and the money is owned by someone, markets will always be imperfect and there will always be money to be made. Keep clicking
The level gives you a static and discrete level to enter, and more importantly, invalidate that is grounded is sound rationale. This allows you to actually systemise cutting losers short and letting winners run, and thats the real value of the trading style imo
80% of the edge in breakout trading is just trend & momentum. The evidence for breakout trading itself having edge is very weak, the reason it's been a successful strategy for so many traders is because the breakout acts as a frame of reference to systemise risk management