Who is responsible for the leisurely disposal of huge RTI appeals pending at State Information Commission with only ONE information Commissioner?The enclo is Section 15(3) of RTI Act,2005
@jdhankhar1@MamataOfficial@SuvenduWB
The man tweeted that a lab report confirmed the Cadbury chocolate (Roasted Almond) was 'unsafe to consume' as they found white worms and web in it.
Read more https://t.co/5UvRU5mT1a
हरियाणा में छेड़खानी और रैप के झूठे मुकदमे दर्ज करवाने वाली महिलाओं पर होगी कार्यवाही। कोर्ट और पुलिस ने भी माना,पैसे लेकर शिकायत वापिस लेती है महिलाए।
हरियाणा पुलिस को साधुवाद
🙏🙏
@cmohry@anilvijminister@DGPHaryana@police_haryana@ANI
The Unstoppable Jyoti Dalal madam from Gurgaon strike again. I am sure you remember her
Kripya kuch to kijiye @gurgaonpolice kitne gareeb insaano ke paise nahi dengi ye madam aur kab tak ?
Shaadi ka Jhansa by an AIIMS doctor
Name of sisters also added to case
This is trailer. Full movie will begin with section 69 when entire families would be roped in just like #498A#TechnicalRape#RollBack69
Every falsely accused parents and husband who are fighting against biased Judiciary, who don't follow constitution.
Shame on Judiciary
Shame on Government
#1CroreAlimony#FalseCaseDay
Untold Pain ...
In India, even a 15 year old minor boy can give false marriage promise to a 21 year old girl & get arrested
Section 69 that punishes a man for 10 years if he goes back on promise of marriage will be used in the most bizarre situations in India
#RollBack69
धारा 69 का उसी तरह दुरुपयोग होगा जैसे शादी का झांसा देकर बलात्कार कानून का हो रहा है मै एक संगठन चलाती हूं। मैने हजारों परिवारों को बर्बाद होते देखा है। मैं इस कानून के खिलाफ हूं।
@narendramodi@AmitShah@cmohry@anilvijminister@DGPHaryana@ANI
There were specific directions from the Registrar that the advocate's whose matter is not listed in court should not be allowed to enter inside the court.
"If this order is not written in the constitution then I'll not follow. show this order in the constitution." - Lady advocat
This is unbelievable!! Supreme Court judges made forgery legal in India.
After this judgement, nothing can stop wives from forging bank, passport, loan and other documents.
This is the case of a old activist of Bangalore. What outraged the judges?
"How dare a man give such a relentless fight for 15 years to teach the woman a lesson? How dare he?" This is the mindset.
If child's best interest is all that matters, then why Supreme Court judges are sleeping over shared parenting and other children related PILs for last 6 years? Why?
This proves, judges do not want to follow the law.
https://t.co/H1cwskgD0v
Father implicated in a #FalseRape case by daughter because he scolded her after catching her with boyfriend gets relief from High Court
Lower Court had sentenced him to life imprisonment even when medical proved nothing
HE SPENT 12 YEARS IN JAIL !
NO COMPENSATION OFCOURSE
There are 372 replies to this tweet. Tried to find but Not one tweet where someone would have shared any such incident of anyone they know validating the desperate need for such law. Police knows well this would be mother of 498A in terms of making money. That's why posts even before implementation 🤑🤑🤑
India has a fetish for everything female led. This has been going on for sometime and it has reached it euphoric stage now. All women railway station, all women flight crew etc. Ok go ahead and create all women regiment and all women border force, why only men has to die at the border!
Also, please create all women high court and supreme court judges, all women state and central cabinet. Lets see how much conviction they have on women led 🤡
A 26-year-old man forms a sexual relationship with a 13-year-old girl with her consent. What will you call it? Grooming and rape. Isn't it? Certainly not love.
Today Bombay HC granted bail to the man by observing that the relationship was made due to love and not lust, and the minor girl consented to it. Court also said that the boy, too, is of a tender age (26 years, tender?).
What explains this kind of leniency when the IPC clearly says that any sexual relationship with a minor is rape, even with consent? There are no ifs or buts about it. From where does this love/lust angle come? Then they expect people to respect the judiciary with their eyes closed.