@mrrasmulan You know, these are fake, but it fulfills it's purpose of getting the reach and likes. And get a huge payout.
Damn, I never thought this way.
Why can't Albinos dye their hair??
I haven't seen one single person who dye their hair.
Don't misunderstand, I'm talking about people from rurals who have problem assimilating in their society.
@AbhishekGa74545@TeamYouTube@YouTube Youtube has removed your channel as part of removing AI Slop. This was told months ago, idk how u survived till now. But it was rightly removed.
Also, no matter what you do, the channel won't come back.
I understood one thing.
I will have to change certain things if I want to continue being 'productive'.
This doesn't mean I'll become less of what I am right now, No.
I would focus on my own plight more than anything else.
Thank you.
@worshipVK I don't believe a Damn of the above. But let's give her benefit of doubt.
Agreed all of the points, however what's up with the last point?
"She has requested modi ji to help ruchika get her share of property" ?????
Behti ganga me haath dhona?
Fact-checker @zoo_bear is begging for donations. I will make sure he gets his entire year’s requirements.
All he has to do is to fact-check publicly whether what Nupur said is derived from Sunan an-Nasa'i 3378; Vol. 4, B 26, Hadith 3380.
Take the challenge, Zubair. "Be a man."
As promised, we will take every matter to its logical conclusion.
🚨 Strange & Shocking!
@YouTube has still not complied with the binding Order of the Grievance Appellate Committee dated 15.07.2026 in Appeal No. 8321/2026.
The GAC had clearly directed YouTube to take down the video “Can Hindus Eat BEEF? | Kerala Story 2 EXPOSED” by Dhruv Rathee, within 24 hours.
This Order was passed pursuant to the direction of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court dated 03.07.2026 in W.P.(C) 8617/2026.
Despite this, the video continues to remain publicly available.
Let us remind YouTube:
- As per Rule 7 of the IT Rules, 2021, failure to comply with the Rules (including GAC orders under Rule 3A(7)) means Section 79 safe harbour will not apply.
- YouTube can be held directly and personally liable for the content that was ordered to be removed.
@YouTube@TeamYouTube
Ignoring a binding statutory order passed after the Hon'ble High Court’s direction will have consequences.