Pasty Dunbar

CEO of Weirdly Words, author, artist, wife, mother, lover of music and life!

[Pasty Dunbar @PastyD]

This one is tough. She could feel threatened because he didn’t walk away, but, neither did she. She didn’t call for help either. 2. He has no weapon, and never once gets into her personal space; but, he continues to advance toward her. 3. Neither makes any physical contact. Was there any threat of violence? We don’t know. We can’t hear what they are saying in the video. 4. Yes, he is an Army Vet, but how would she know that? For me, as a female, men are bigger and stronger than I. I wouldn’t want an irate man to get close to me. 5. She seemed to approach him first, which could mean she wasn’t afraid of him at all. That would be problematic. However, he didn’t back down, even after he knew she had a gun.

[Pasty Dunbar @PastyD]

@fashionistaera Bottom line is this - it is their wedding. Agree. Disagree. Like. Don’t like. Doesn’t matter. It’s happening and it’s being overly broadcast by posters, which is exactly the intent, IMHO.

[Dr. Dawn Michael @DawnsMission]

😡 My heart is breaking watching this...

Justice Clarence Thomas just dropped the TRUTH that every American needs to hear. Progressivism isn’t just some harmless idea — it’s a direct assault on the very soul of this country. It wants to replace God-given rights with government-granted privileges. It demands we become weak, subservient, and dependent.

This is an OUTRAGE. I sure do hope that Congress will finally step up and FIX THIS before it’s too late. Justice Clarence Thomas is a TRUE PATRIOT — a man of courage, conviction, and unwavering love for the Constitution and the America our Founders envisioned.

In a time when so many are afraid to speak truth, he stands tall. I am sure that you are just as OUTRAGED over this as I am. If this video moves you like it moved me, share it. Loudly. Our rights don’t come from Washington. They come from God. And no government will ever take that away from us.

[Pasty Dunbar @PastyD]

@BigYash_609 It’s sad that the media has made everyone so suspicious of other people. They only show us the worse of the worse and hardly ever the good. I hope these young men find success in their endeavor.

[Pasty Dunbar @PastyD]

@BlakeLivelyLies Oh! And don’t forget she’s shy! Shy people always dress like that.

[Pasty Dunbar @PastyD]

@Breaking57 When she said, “we can pay separately” that said it all. Pay, dude. Move on.

[Pasty Dunbar @PastyD]

You know, this is what happens when people focus on looks over heart and quality of the person. Not that a person who takes care of themselves is not a good person, but when we qualify a “date” on the photo appearance of a person we are setting ourselves up for failure. Know that a person becomes more beautiful when we actually get to know their heart.

[Pasty Dunbar @PastyD]

@TheNewsAgents @maitlis I think it is more than shameful. I think it is diabolical.

[Pasty Dunbar @PastyD]

Okay, let’s just look at things realistically. IF there are high profile, multimillionaire “people” who were part of the Epstein horrors, do you NOT THINK they would have protected themselves? Would Epstein not have hidden their identity with some kind of safeguards for himself? We will NEVER find the truth with this, but they will continue to use this to keep us focused on this and not on what is happening now.

[Pasty Dunbar @PastyD]

@itsrosesm I’d feel like I needed to pull out my ID and vote… like I normally do in TN.

[Lawyered Up @Lawyeredup1]

#LivelyvWayfarer Breaking News: Lively Seeks over $8 million in Attorneys Fees and Costs. WOW!!!

According to Lively's Memo, this amount represents "the fees and costs that relate to (i) motion practice associated with the Wayfarer Action, including, but not limited to, the prevailing MTD, then Rule 11 Motion, and motions to compel; (ii) work performed associated with the Consolidated Action as a whole, including discovery through the deadline for the Wayfarer Parties to amend their pleading that was relevant to both actions; and (iii) Lively’s 47.1 Motion, including this application."

Lively lawyers are arguing that: "Section 47.1 does not limit the recovery of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to the successful defense of a particular claim (i.e., defamation), but, instead, applies to the successful defense of “the litigation.” Cal. Civ. Code § 47.1(b)."

I completely disagree with this argument. It is preposterous. California Civil Code section 47.1(b) provides as follows:

"A prevailing defendant in any defamation action brought against that defendant for making a communication that is privileged under this section shall be entitled to their reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for successfully defending themselves in the litigation, plus treble damages for any harm caused to them by the defamation action against them, in addition to punitive damages available under Section 3294 or any other relief otherwise permitted by law."

Section 47.1(b) permits recovery by a defendant in a defamation action. It does not permit recovery by a defendant in any other type of action. The statute further amplified the defamation nexus of the recovery by explaining that the defamation case must have been brought as result of the defendant (Lively) making a privileged communication. Finally, the statute limited the compensatory and treble damages to the harm caused by the defamation action. Thus, it could not have been clearer that the statute was focused on the defamation action.

Lively's lawyers are arguing that when the statute permitted recovery for "successfully defending themselves in the litigation", the word "litigation" refers to the entire lawsuit, not just the defamation portion. This is ridiculous. Using simple English construction, it is readily apparent that in using the term "the litigation", the statute was referring to an already identified or discussed litigation or legal action. It makes no sense for the statute to use the term "the litigation" when no litigation had previously been identified, referenced or discussed. As a matter of fact, however, the statute had previously identified a form of litigation, namely, the defamation action. Defending oneself in the defamation action and prevailing in that defense is litigation. That's "the litigation" that the statute mentioned when it permitted a prevailing defendant to recover attorney's fees and costs.

Lively's argument on this issue is so ridiculous that her lawyers risk losing credibility with the judge. Let's see how Wayfarer responds. I have not even begun to discuss the itemization of the fees.

[TV & Movie Addict 🍿🦋 @TVMovieAddict]

I told you it was going to be bad if Blake Lively was waiting til midnight to submit her letter for attorney fees. It wasn’t enough for Blake Lively to create a sham law suit to steal private messages. It wasn’t enough to bully Justin Baldoni on set and make false accusations. It was enough to blacklisted him to her Hollywood friends.

Folks, this woman and her team are so greedy she is asking for $8 million dollars 😮😮 The NYT is asking for 150k for the same motion. Lively is asking 800k from Wallace for the same motion. But with Wayfarer she wants 10x that amount. Her lawyers should be embarrassed. Blake Lively is an embarrassment. What she is doing is disgusting. She keeps showing the public who she is. Shame on her #blakelively

[Pasty Dunbar @PastyD]

@BrandonStraka So, they go around asking questions but only want to hear their own viewpoint from everyone. He is respectfully trying to answer their question, but then gets verbally abused. If you don’t want to hear someone else’s opinion don’t ask them a question.

[Pasty Dunbar @PastyD]

@WellsJorda89710 I’m starting to come to the opinion that these people KNOW they are spouting lies and nonsense, but they want their 15 minutes in the spotlight to do self promotion. They like the attention, even if it is at the expense of an innocent young man who was murdered. It’s very sad.

[Pasty Dunbar @PastyD]

@_lagarto5150 @WallStreetApes @Airbnb Truth, but if they took him to court he would have irrefutable evidence and could counter. People, I have learned, are crazy.

[Pasty Dunbar @PastyD]

@PizzaPepe It’s VERY obvious that man is not military. My eldest son was an officer (did his 20) and would admonish the reserve kids that wore cammies off the base. You don’t do that.

[Pasty Dunbar @PastyD]

@Aku_700 We have to quit making excuses for the behaviors of our youth and start making them accountable for what they choose to do. When we took power away from parents and educators we created this monster.

[Pasty Dunbar @PastyD]

How wonderful that the Metcalf family put their love for their son, in spite of their great sorrow, to help other children. May this young man grow up to do great things with his life!

[🎹 Ames™ 🎹 @Real_Ames]

In the midst of unimaginable loss, the Metcalf family chose to honor Austin's memory by investing in the future of others.

The first Austin Metcalf Memorial Scholarship has been awarded to Kevon Jackson, helping a student pursue his college dreams in Austin's name.

That's what the family's crowdfunding efforts have gone toward—not bitterness, but hope. Not revenge, but opportunity.

I hope people continue to support this scholarship year after year so more young people can receive the same blessing. Every student helped will be another reminder that Austin's legacy continues to make a difference.

What a beautiful way to ensure his name lives on. ❤️

(Karmelo Anthony supporters are livid because this goes against their " Metcalf's are racist" narrative. )