October 4 marked one year since I launched Against the Left. 27 articles and 200 subscribers later, I couldn’t be more proud of what I’ve accomplished with this newsletter.
To commemorate this anniversary, I want to highlight some of my personal favorite pieces. 🧵
Most adults need to be homeschooling themselves. With some exceptions, it is very likely your education failed you in significant ways. Especially if you went to public school.
I'm sharing the lifetime reading list from my high school English teacher. He loved books, thought deeply, and told us that during the War he always had a paperback in his back pocket to escape into.
*not my checkmarks, had to get a copy from a friend after losing mine
A free market produces those goods and services which are at the top of the consumer priority list.
Regulation is when the government substitutes its own priorities for those of consumers.
"I know you wanted more X, but we're giving you more Y instead. Be grateful."
We’re making an historic $4 billion investment in Canadian culture so that Canadian artists can tell our stories. So that our institutions can preserve them. So that all Canadians can experience and share them in communities across the country.
Strengthening our identity, our sovereignty, and everything that unites us.
Read more: https://t.co/o97z0Wdn2x
@ladiesofliberty The *Bill of Rights* is arguably such a list. The Constitution as a whole is quite the opposite.
"The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes...To borrow Money....To establish Post Offices..."
What Chris means, of course, is someone who can effectively wield the *rhetoric* of free markets.
Conservatives would roundly reject anyone who actually believes in free markets.
Have spoken with many people on the Right in the past week. A recurring theme: must reconstitute the party behind someone who can combine free-market economics, effective culture war, foreign policy realism, and hyper-competent administration. DeSantis frequently mentioned.
I'm a public school superintendent in Florida. And I believe in school choice.
Some people find that surprising.
They shouldn't.
I believe in free markets and I believe competition makes everyone better.
Florida has given parents real power to choose where their children learn. Charter schools, private schools, virtual options, scholarships that follow the child.
I don't see that as a threat to public education. I see it as the push public education needed.
When a business knows its customers can leave, it gets better. It listens. It innovates. It earns loyalty instead of assuming it.
Our customers are students and parents. And in my district, we compete for them every day.
That means:
→ Building programs families can't find anywhere else → Responding to parents like their time and trust matter → Measuring ourselves by whether families choose to stay → Never treating an enrollment as something we're owed
Competition doesn't weaken public schools. Complacency does.
The question isn't whether families should have a choice. They should, and in Florida, they do.
The question is whether we'll give them a reason to choose us.
People defending Russell Brand… I genuinely don’t get it.
I don’t care if a rapist is a Dad
I don’t care if a rapist is a Husband
I don’t care if a rapist is popular
I don’t care about a rapists religion
I don’t care about a rapists political views
It’s soooooo easy to not rape, I have no sympathy for people who do it.
If he was sorry, he had over a decade to make amends with the women.
The BC Human Rights Tribunal's decision might seem excessive, but anytime a minority is slighted and a business gets away with it, the more it gives permission to others. Bias becomes so ingrained that it requires extreme measures to force people stop and think before they act.
@Holden114 Government: [Taxes half your paycheck. Regulates you to death. Wastes tons of the money it takes in.]
Government: Oh hey, can we also have $6 for food for kids.
Me: Are you kidding me?
Government supporter: I just don't get the reflexive hostility.
Some thoughts on each of the issues mentioned 🧵:
Guns
-I think the way gun rights are typically presented by libertarians is not great. The key is that gun rules should be specific to each private property, not just "anything goes."
What’s your least libertarian opinion? 👀
Libertarians don’t always agree, and that’s okay! You don’t have to be a complete ideologue to believe in more freedom.
So I asked libertarians what their least libertarian opinion is. What’s yours?
@brendan_loves Libertarianism is about private property rights. If a private property owner says no guns are allowed on his property, then it is a violation of his liberty to take a gun onto his property.
@brendan_loves The idea that you should be allowed to carry whatever guns you please anywhere you like is anti-libertarian. That's what I mean by "anything goes."
Betting shops
-Classic example of paternalism. I know you mean well, but why should other people's vices be banned and not your own? Spooner's Vices are Not Crimes comes to mind.
Also you don't know their situation so how do you know what's best for them?
AI decisions
-Don't really understand this one.
Min wage/unemployment
-I wouldn't consider this position anti-libertarian technically. It's more anti-Austrian.
Foie gras
-Understandable. Good answer.