@ghudbob@bon37@StevenWallaby You're arguing with a point I never made. I never said Kane won’t make another movie. I was criticizing the idea that a work gets credit because future work will smooth out its flaws. Hence the "Season 2 will fix it" comparison. Where did I say Kane wasn't making another movie
@ghudbob@bon37@StevenWallaby Genuinely curious how you thought my initial response was in anyway assuming Kane wasn’t going to make another movie. Break it down for me, champ.
@HistoryMjr76@StevenWallaby There really isn't any technical failings of the film. It had 118m dollar budget. Acting, production, sound, directing is “technically” sound and phenomenal for a a debut (as it should because a good amount of money was used to make it). Where the crit lies is in the narrative
@NothingWithMilk@HistoryMjr76@StevenWallaby Ahh yes. My bad. Thanks for the correction. But, point still stands. 10m movie should look like what we saw on that screen. No excuse.
@Acedefective3f@StevenWallaby I'm not even attacking the film or Parsons. Im pointing at the problem that a movie shouldn't need equals for it to be fleshed out because that's essentially just a TV show… which he pretty much made on youtube
@StevenWallaby Maybe we focus on making a singular good movie that stands on its own without having to build out 3 films for it to make sense… or be “complete vision” 2 hours each... Let's say he does 3-4 movies… sounds like a solid pitch for a limited series
@faerygoffmother@drekosdead It is though lol literally no one but its fans and a particular type of person on the internet know what it is. My wife has 0 clue, coworkers have 0 clue. If you went outside you’d know it’s still niche. Big audience doesn’t = not niche.
@Logo_Daedalus any recs on kids books that aren’t completely trash? I heard you mentioned Beatrix Potter which I love but wondering if you had more recs