Ghannon

Pro-White | Race realist | Biological essentialist | True Conservative.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

This is what a high-trust conservative ethnostate would look like.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

@Angelinahoodie I am not anti-Christian, but I think the evidence shows that race is overwhelmingly more important than Christ.

I'll donate to your funeral costs.
https://t.co/ShqlJcBOYa

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

https://t.co/MDJxWoZmER

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

@OGYoshima @BasicLogicIQ Fascism is just a form of government, like democracy; it’s not an ideological position.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

@BortSimington @Nathan_Porter If the justice system were just doomed, then we'd all suffer equally.

We aren't going to suffer equally. Whites, especially masculine White men, are going to be completely subjugated in the nation that their ancestors built.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

Also, considering that the overwhelming majority of the population consists of political normies, the men who claim to be pro-choice are just taking the path of least resistance, as pro-lifers don't act like rabid animals towards their opposition, so opposing them is easy, outside of logical debate.

However, if we did a prescreening test to account for ideological affiliation, with the goal of identifying and excluding center-right and center-left liberals, and axiomatically individualist conservatives (essentially just liberals), before asking for their position on abortion, I bet the results will be heavily gendered.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

Also, when you compare the life outcomes of children raised by single mothers to those of children raised by single fathers, the fathers produce far more positive results for both male and female children, and it isn’t even close.

I’d be willing to bet that even when children raised by both parents still ended up with negative life outcomes, removing the mother would have made all the difference.

Women are the worst kind of abusers because the methods by which they abuse are almost always overlooked: the manipulation of language and the chronology of events, and the weaponization of official institutions, all to position themselves as either the victim or the benevolent helper.

My own mother was a controlling and highly manipulative bitch who weaponized psychologists against me from the time I was six years old, though she never beat me.

Instead, she completely destroyed my life with a false psychological diagnosis used to justify medicating me with SSRIs, sabotaging my education at every level, and then, as an adult, sabotaging my attempts to join the military to get away from her by weaponizing California’s red-flag laws, which not only made me ineligible for service, but also resulted in the police taking away all of my guns and permanently revoking my Second Amendment rights, despite the fact that I had never made threats or committed any crimes.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

In your attempt to call out establishment “conservatives,” you’ve revealed yourself to be a normie, again.

Humanity isn’t a race; it’s a species, which consists of multiple races, which in turn consist of many ethnicities.

Deporting all non-Whites, repealing the Civil Right Act, and reinstating coverture laws would do more to fix the issues plaguing America today than a return to Christianity ever could.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

@Beerandpizza6 @shadowdefense @SuperNoticer2 @TheSkalez @mattvanswol @grok You are actually retarded.

That SCOTUS ruling doesn't claim that speech and expression are the same thing.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

@AlexStarFamous @bigbabolat @nicksortor @ByronDonalds @j_fishback All of the people you mentioned were dead before the Republican party was founded.

Also, James Madison was a federalist, and like almost all of the Founders, would be completely appalled by an African holding office in a White country.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

@Tomhennessey69 @nicksortor @Ghostofcynthia @ByronDonalds @j_fishback He isn't even a conservative.

I am so sick of individualists claiming to be conservative, which they've been doing since the end of World War 2.

Anyone who thinks that people like Margart Thatcher and Bary Goldwater are conservative is a complete idiot.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

@grok @Beerandpizza6 @shadowdefense @SuperNoticer2 @TheSkalez @mattvanswol So, the comment linked comment is factually incorrect? https://t.co/aF4306iAwr

[M. Warren @Beerandpizza6]

@PatrioticName @shadowdefense @SuperNoticer2 @TheSkalez @mattvanswol Speech is expression, expression is speech. This is only complicated if you’re an idiot.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

@grok @Beerandpizza6 @shadowdefense @SuperNoticer2 @TheSkalez @mattvanswol So, with all of that in mind, claiming that expression is the exact same as speech would be factually incorrect?

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

@grok, explain to @Beerandpizza6 that freedom of speech is a right, but expression, which is best defined as conduct, is not considered speech unless it clearly communicates an idea.

For example, jumping up and down while screaming incoherent babble to display anger is not protected, as it is not comprehensibly communicative.

Also, can you explain to him that Texas v. Johnson doesn't establish expression to be definitionally identical to speech.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

@drewby64345 @Moogsympathizer @KristanHawkins @Campaign4AFC True, but we are in serious need of legal protections against private companies retaliating against speech, especially in the case of employees who are fired for things they said outside of work.

Mobs attacking someone's ability to put food on their table needs to be illegal.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

@Beerandpizza6 @shadowdefense @SuperNoticer2 @TheSkalez @mattvanswol You are actually stupid.

Yes, and as you can see, I quoted the entirety of the sentence, but you didn't.

@grok, can you explain to @Beerandpizza6 that according to currently applicable case law, speech and expression are not the same and are not equally protected.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

“The First Amendment literally forbids the abridgment only of ‘speech…’”

Do you get off on being a liar? You quoted half a sentence.

Also, even if the half of the sentence you quoted was the whole sentence, it wouldn't refute my claim, which that speech and expression have two different legal standards.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

@SergioVengeance @shadowdefense @SuperNoticer2 @TheSkalez @mattvanswol States were never allowed to force religion down people's throats.

Question: what is your primary moral axiom, or do you not have one?

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

In the majority decision for Texas v. Johnson, Justice William Brennan wrote: "The First Amendment literally forbids the abridgment only of 'speech,' but we have long recognized that its protection does not end at the spoken or written word."

He makes this acknowledgement because, legally, expression and speech are defined differently.

Not all conduct is expressive; it must satisfy a specific legal test.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

Your position is fallacious, and your argument misrepresents the SCOTUS decision.

Beginning with the fallacies you’ve committed: claiming we shouldn’t limit speech (especially art) simply because “prudes in the government pick and choose what is obscene” is a non‑sequitur, an ad hominem, and a straw man of my position.

As for your misrepresentation of case law: Jacobellis v. Ohio (1964) did not abolish the obscenity exception to the First Amendment. While the court decided that the movie wasn't observe in a 6-3 majority ruling, it maintained that true obscenity lacks First Amendment protection.

[Ghannon @PatrioticName]

Is that you aren't reading my comments, or that you are unable to comprehend them?

The Fourteenth Amendment did not strengthen the Establishment Clause; it changed its meaning to be one of nationally mandated secularism.

Originally, the Establishment Clause was a matter of federal–state separation. It told Congress to stay out of religion because religious policy was understood to belong to the states, not to the national government.