Patriots Corner

Fighting for Freedom of Speech, Our Culture, Our way of life, Our Christian Values and for our Children and their Children.

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

Some are just blind and refuse to see the truth.

He Promised to Clean Up Politics. He Took More Gifts Than Any of Them.

Keir Starmer built his political identity on one promise above all others. After fourteen years of Conservative sleaze, partygate, donor scandals, a Prime Minister fined by police, he would be different. Standards in public life would be restored. The contrast was the entire pitch.

The declared gifts tell a different story. By September 2024, two months into government, Starmer had accepted more than £100,000 in tickets, clothing and accommodation, more than any other recent party leader, Conservative or Labour, on record. Nearly 40 sets of free tickets during his time as Labour leader. £4,000 of Taylor Swift hospitality. £698 for Coldplay. A free four-day holiday to a Welsh beauty spot worth £4,500. From Labour donor Waheed Alli alone, £20,000 of accommodation, £16,000 of work clothing and £2,485 of glasses, while Alli was simultaneously given a pass to Downing Street.

The accommodation deserves closer attention. It was Alli's £18 million Covent Garden penthouse, and Starmer's justification was that his son needed somewhere quiet to revise for GCSEs, away from journalists outside the family home. A sympathetic explanation, until you learn the same penthouse had already been used by Starmer in December 2021 to film a televised "stay home" message to the British public during the pandemic, with family photos and Christmas cards arranged on the shelves behind him to make it appear he was broadcasting from his own house. He told the country to stay in theirs while filming from a borrowed multi-million pound flat dressed to look like somewhere it wasn't.

Compare the total to the people he replaced. Rishi Sunak declared no personal hospitality beyond a £2,595 club membership. Liz Truss recorded four modest items across an entire decade in Parliament, a football match, Wimbledon, an opera and the races, totalling under £4,000. David Cameron's largest declared item was a £4,475 discount on personal training. Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister whose conduct Starmer spent years campaigning against, still didn't approach £100,000 in personal gifts while actually serving in Downing Street. Starmer's total exceeds the combined declarations of several of his predecessors, and he reached it within months of taking office.

When the scale of this became public, Angela Eagle, then a serving minister, was sent to defend it on Times Radio. Asked the simplest possible question, why the Prime Minister couldn't buy his own glasses on his own salary, she said: "I'm afraid I'm not responsible for decisions the Prime Minister makes. I don't have an opinion." No defence was offered because none existed.

Starmer's own justification, that security requirements prevent him from sitting among the public at events, might extend to concerts as well as football matches. It does not explain the Welsh holiday, a private four-day stay with no public stand to avoid. It does not explain the £16,000 of work clothing or the £2,485 glasses, items with no security dimension whatsoever. And it does not explain why a Labour donor was funding his wardrobe while simultaneously holding a Downing Street security pass.

This matters now for a reason beyond the original scandal. Starmer's net approval has since collapsed to minus 66, the worst recorded for any Prime Minister since Ipsos began tracking in 1977. The instinct from his own side is to blame billionaire-funded misinformation, foreign interference, a hostile press. None of that explains this. The gifts were real, declared in his own name, on the public record, defended by his own minister with the admission that there was nothing to say. The collapse in trust did not need to be manufactured. It was earned, line by line, in the register of members' financial interests, by a Prime Minister who promised the country something his own conduct then failed to deliver.

Copied from another post

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

@TRobinsonNewEra @karlstefanovic

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

Remember what you said about Vinnie jones back in the 80’s. When you said that Wimbledon was a bunch of head cases led by Vinnie Jones. He was utterly compelling, he was big, he was aggressive, he was a character, “and we in the newspaper game wanted to have people like Vinnie on our front pages because they sold newspapers”
That’s whats important to you not TRUTH but what’s gets you clicks likes etc etc.

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

@Murk441 💯

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

@Murk441 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

He Promised to Clean Up Politics. He Took More Gifts Than Any of Them.

Keir Starmer built his political identity on one promise above all others. After fourteen years of Conservative sleaze, partygate, donor scandals, a Prime Minister fined by police, he would be different. Standards in public life would be restored. The contrast was the entire pitch.

The declared gifts tell a different story. By September 2024, two months into government, Starmer had accepted more than £100,000 in tickets, clothing and accommodation, more than any other recent party leader, Conservative or Labour, on record. Nearly 40 sets of free tickets during his time as Labour leader. £4,000 of Taylor Swift hospitality. £698 for Coldplay. A free four-day holiday to a Welsh beauty spot worth £4,500. From Labour donor Waheed Alli alone, £20,000 of accommodation, £16,000 of work clothing and £2,485 of glasses, while Alli was simultaneously given a pass to Downing Street.

The accommodation deserves closer attention. It was Alli's £18 million Covent Garden penthouse, and Starmer's justification was that his son needed somewhere quiet to revise for GCSEs, away from journalists outside the family home. A sympathetic explanation, until you learn the same penthouse had already been used by Starmer in December 2021 to film a televised "stay home" message to the British public during the pandemic, with family photos and Christmas cards arranged on the shelves behind him to make it appear he was broadcasting from his own house. He told the country to stay in theirs while filming from a borrowed multi-million pound flat dressed to look like somewhere it wasn't.

Compare the total to the people he replaced. Rishi Sunak declared no personal hospitality beyond a £2,595 club membership. Liz Truss recorded four modest items across an entire decade in Parliament, a football match, Wimbledon, an opera and the races, totalling under £4,000. David Cameron's largest declared item was a £4,475 discount on personal training. Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister whose conduct Starmer spent years campaigning against, still didn't approach £100,000 in personal gifts while actually serving in Downing Street. Starmer's total exceeds the combined declarations of several of his predecessors, and he reached it within months of taking office.

When the scale of this became public, Angela Eagle, then a serving minister, was sent to defend it on Times Radio. Asked the simplest possible question, why the Prime Minister couldn't buy his own glasses on his own salary, she said: "I'm afraid I'm not responsible for decisions the Prime Minister makes. I don't have an opinion." No defence was offered because none existed.

Starmer's own justification, that security requirements prevent him from sitting among the public at events, might extend to concerts as well as football matches. It does not explain the Welsh holiday, a private four-day stay with no public stand to avoid. It does not explain the £16,000 of work clothing or the £2,485 glasses, items with no security dimension whatsoever. And it does not explain why a Labour donor was funding his wardrobe while simultaneously holding a Downing Street security pass.

This matters now for a reason beyond the original scandal. Starmer's net approval has since collapsed to minus 66, the worst recorded for any Prime Minister since Ipsos began tracking in 1977. The instinct from his own side is to blame billionaire-funded misinformation, foreign interference, a hostile press. None of that explains this. The gifts were real, declared in his own name, on the public record, defended by his own minister with the admission that there was nothing to say. The collapse in trust did not need to be manufactured. It was earned, line by line, in the register of members' financial interests, by a Prime Minister who promised the country something his own conduct then failed to deliver.

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

He Promised to Clean Up Politics. He Took More Gifts Than Any of Them.

Keir Starmer built his political identity on one promise above all others. After fourteen years of Conservative sleaze, partygate, donor scandals, a Prime Minister fined by police, he would be different. Standards in public life would be restored. The contrast was the entire pitch.

The declared gifts tell a different story. By September 2024, two months into government, Starmer had accepted more than £100,000 in tickets, clothing and accommodation, more than any other recent party leader, Conservative or Labour, on record. Nearly 40 sets of free tickets during his time as Labour leader. £4,000 of Taylor Swift hospitality. £698 for Coldplay. A free four-day holiday to a Welsh beauty spot worth £4,500. From Labour donor Waheed Alli alone, £20,000 of accommodation, £16,000 of work clothing and £2,485 of glasses, while Alli was simultaneously given a pass to Downing Street.

The accommodation deserves closer attention. It was Alli's £18 million Covent Garden penthouse, and Starmer's justification was that his son needed somewhere quiet to revise for GCSEs, away from journalists outside the family home. A sympathetic explanation, until you learn the same penthouse had already been used by Starmer in December 2021 to film a televised "stay home" message to the British public during the pandemic, with family photos and Christmas cards arranged on the shelves behind him to make it appear he was broadcasting from his own house. He told the country to stay in theirs while filming from a borrowed multi-million pound flat dressed to look like somewhere it wasn't.

Compare the total to the people he replaced. Rishi Sunak declared no personal hospitality beyond a £2,595 club membership. Liz Truss recorded four modest items across an entire decade in Parliament, a football match, Wimbledon, an opera and the races, totalling under £4,000. David Cameron's largest declared item was a £4,475 discount on personal training. Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister whose conduct Starmer spent years campaigning against, still didn't approach £100,000 in personal gifts while actually serving in Downing Street. Starmer's total exceeds the combined declarations of several of his predecessors, and he reached it within months of taking office.

When the scale of this became public, Angela Eagle, then a serving minister, was sent to defend it on Times Radio. Asked the simplest possible question, why the Prime Minister couldn't buy his own glasses on his own salary, she said: "I'm afraid I'm not responsible for decisions the Prime Minister makes. I don't have an opinion." No defence was offered because none existed.

Starmer's own justification, that security requirements prevent him from sitting among the public at events, might extend to concerts as well as football matches. It does not explain the Welsh holiday, a private four-day stay with no public stand to avoid. It does not explain the £16,000 of work clothing or the £2,485 glasses, items with no security dimension whatsoever. And it does not explain why a Labour donor was funding his wardrobe while simultaneously holding a Downing Street security pass.

This matters now for a reason beyond the original scandal. Starmer's net approval has since collapsed to minus 66, the worst recorded for any Prime Minister since Ipsos began tracking in 1977. The instinct from his own side is to blame billionaire-funded misinformation, foreign interference, a hostile press. None of that explains this. The gifts were real, declared in his own name, on the public record, defended by his own minister with the admission that there was nothing to say. The collapse in trust did not need to be manufactured. It was earned, line by line, in the register of members' financial interests, by a Prime Minister who promised the country something his own conduct then failed to deliver.

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

@piersmorgan @PiersUncensored Twat your not worthy

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

He Promised to Clean Up Politics. He Took More Gifts Than Any of Them.

Keir Starmer built his political identity on one promise above all others. After fourteen years of Conservative sleaze, partygate, donor scandals, a Prime Minister fined by police, he would be different. Standards in public life would be restored. The contrast was the entire pitch.

The declared gifts tell a different story. By September 2024, two months into government, Starmer had accepted more than £100,000 in tickets, clothing and accommodation, more than any other recent party leader, Conservative or Labour, on record. Nearly 40 sets of free tickets during his time as Labour leader. £4,000 of Taylor Swift hospitality. £698 for Coldplay. A free four-day holiday to a Welsh beauty spot worth £4,500. From Labour donor Waheed Alli alone, £20,000 of accommodation, £16,000 of work clothing and £2,485 of glasses, while Alli was simultaneously given a pass to Downing Street.

The accommodation deserves closer attention. It was Alli's £18 million Covent Garden penthouse, and Starmer's justification was that his son needed somewhere quiet to revise for GCSEs, away from journalists outside the family home. A sympathetic explanation, until you learn the same penthouse had already been used by Starmer in December 2021 to film a televised "stay home" message to the British public during the pandemic, with family photos and Christmas cards arranged on the shelves behind him to make it appear he was broadcasting from his own house. He told the country to stay in theirs while filming from a borrowed multi-million pound flat dressed to look like somewhere it wasn't.

Compare the total to the people he replaced. Rishi Sunak declared no personal hospitality beyond a £2,595 club membership. Liz Truss recorded four modest items across an entire decade in Parliament, a football match, Wimbledon, an opera and the races, totalling under £4,000. David Cameron's largest declared item was a £4,475 discount on personal training. Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister whose conduct Starmer spent years campaigning against, still didn't approach £100,000 in personal gifts while actually serving in Downing Street. Starmer's total exceeds the combined declarations of several of his predecessors, and he reached it within months of taking office.

When the scale of this became public, Angela Eagle, then a serving minister, was sent to defend it on Times Radio. Asked the simplest possible question, why the Prime Minister couldn't buy his own glasses on his own salary, she said: "I'm afraid I'm not responsible for decisions the Prime Minister makes. I don't have an opinion." No defence was offered because none existed.

Starmer's own justification, that security requirements prevent him from sitting among the public at events, might extend to concerts as well as football matches. It does not explain the Welsh holiday, a private four-day stay with no public stand to avoid. It does not explain the £16,000 of work clothing or the £2,485 glasses, items with no security dimension whatsoever. And it does not explain why a Labour donor was funding his wardrobe while simultaneously holding a Downing Street security pass.

This matters now for a reason beyond the original scandal. Starmer's net approval has since collapsed to minus 66, the worst recorded for any Prime Minister since Ipsos began tracking in 1977. The instinct from his own side is to blame billionaire-funded misinformation, foreign interference, a hostile press. None of that explains this. The gifts were real, declared in his own name, on the public record, defended by his own minister with the admission that there was nothing to say. The collapse in trust did not need to be manufactured. It was earned, line by line, in the register of members' financial interests, by a Prime Minister who promised the country something his own conduct then failed to deliver.

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

He Promised to Clean Up Politics. He Took More Gifts Than Any of Them.

Keir Starmer built his political identity on one promise above all others. After fourteen years of Conservative sleaze, partygate, donor scandals, a Prime Minister fined by police, he would be different. Standards in public life would be restored. The contrast was the entire pitch.

The declared gifts tell a different story. By September 2024, two months into government, Starmer had accepted more than £100,000 in tickets, clothing and accommodation, more than any other recent party leader, Conservative or Labour, on record. Nearly 40 sets of free tickets during his time as Labour leader. £4,000 of Taylor Swift hospitality. £698 for Coldplay. A free four-day holiday to a Welsh beauty spot worth £4,500. From Labour donor Waheed Alli alone, £20,000 of accommodation, £16,000 of work clothing and £2,485 of glasses, while Alli was simultaneously given a pass to Downing Street.

The accommodation deserves closer attention. It was Alli's £18 million Covent Garden penthouse, and Starmer's justification was that his son needed somewhere quiet to revise for GCSEs, away from journalists outside the family home. A sympathetic explanation, until you learn the same penthouse had already been used by Starmer in December 2021 to film a televised "stay home" message to the British public during the pandemic, with family photos and Christmas cards arranged on the shelves behind him to make it appear he was broadcasting from his own house. He told the country to stay in theirs while filming from a borrowed multi-million pound flat dressed to look like somewhere it wasn't.

Compare the total to the people he replaced. Rishi Sunak declared no personal hospitality beyond a £2,595 club membership. Liz Truss recorded four modest items across an entire decade in Parliament, a football match, Wimbledon, an opera and the races, totalling under £4,000. David Cameron's largest declared item was a £4,475 discount on personal training. Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister whose conduct Starmer spent years campaigning against, still didn't approach £100,000 in personal gifts while actually serving in Downing Street. Starmer's total exceeds the combined declarations of several of his predecessors, and he reached it within months of taking office.

When the scale of this became public, Angela Eagle, then a serving minister, was sent to defend it on Times Radio. Asked the simplest possible question, why the Prime Minister couldn't buy his own glasses on his own salary, she said: "I'm afraid I'm not responsible for decisions the Prime Minister makes. I don't have an opinion." No defence was offered because none existed.

Starmer's own justification, that security requirements prevent him from sitting among the public at events, might extend to concerts as well as football matches. It does not explain the Welsh holiday, a private four-day stay with no public stand to avoid. It does not explain the £16,000 of work clothing or the £2,485 glasses, items with no security dimension whatsoever. And it does not explain why a Labour donor was funding his wardrobe while simultaneously holding a Downing Street security pass.

This matters now for a reason beyond the original scandal. Starmer's net approval has since collapsed to minus 66, the worst recorded for any Prime Minister since Ipsos began tracking in 1977. The instinct from his own side is to blame billionaire-funded misinformation, foreign interference, a hostile press. None of that explains this. The gifts were real, declared in his own name, on the public record, defended by his own minister with the admission that there was nothing to say. The collapse in trust did not need to be manufactured. It was earned, line by line, in the register of members' financial interests, by a Prime Minister who promised the country something his own conduct then failed to deliver.

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

He Promised to Clean Up Politics. He Took More Gifts Than Any of Them.

Keir Starmer built his political identity on one promise above all others. After fourteen years of Conservative sleaze, partygate, donor scandals, a Prime Minister fined by police, he would be different. Standards in public life would be restored. The contrast was the entire pitch.

The declared gifts tell a different story. By September 2024, two months into government, Starmer had accepted more than £100,000 in tickets, clothing and accommodation, more than any other recent party leader, Conservative or Labour, on record. Nearly 40 sets of free tickets during his time as Labour leader. £4,000 of Taylor Swift hospitality. £698 for Coldplay. A free four-day holiday to a Welsh beauty spot worth £4,500. From Labour donor Waheed Alli alone, £20,000 of accommodation, £16,000 of work clothing and £2,485 of glasses, while Alli was simultaneously given a pass to Downing Street.

The accommodation deserves closer attention. It was Alli's £18 million Covent Garden penthouse, and Starmer's justification was that his son needed somewhere quiet to revise for GCSEs, away from journalists outside the family home. A sympathetic explanation, until you learn the same penthouse had already been used by Starmer in December 2021 to film a televised "stay home" message to the British public during the pandemic, with family photos and Christmas cards arranged on the shelves behind him to make it appear he was broadcasting from his own house. He told the country to stay in theirs while filming from a borrowed multi-million pound flat dressed to look like somewhere it wasn't.

Compare the total to the people he replaced. Rishi Sunak declared no personal hospitality beyond a £2,595 club membership. Liz Truss recorded four modest items across an entire decade in Parliament, a football match, Wimbledon, an opera and the races, totalling under £4,000. David Cameron's largest declared item was a £4,475 discount on personal training. Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister whose conduct Starmer spent years campaigning against, still didn't approach £100,000 in personal gifts while actually serving in Downing Street. Starmer's total exceeds the combined declarations of several of his predecessors, and he reached it within months of taking office.

When the scale of this became public, Angela Eagle, then a serving minister, was sent to defend it on Times Radio. Asked the simplest possible question, why the Prime Minister couldn't buy his own glasses on his own salary, she said: "I'm afraid I'm not responsible for decisions the Prime Minister makes. I don't have an opinion." No defence was offered because none existed.

Starmer's own justification, that security requirements prevent him from sitting among the public at events, might extend to concerts as well as football matches. It does not explain the Welsh holiday, a private four-day stay with no public stand to avoid. It does not explain the £16,000 of work clothing or the £2,485 glasses, items with no security dimension whatsoever. And it does not explain why a Labour donor was funding his wardrobe while simultaneously holding a Downing Street security pass.

This matters now for a reason beyond the original scandal. Starmer's net approval has since collapsed to minus 66, the worst recorded for any Prime Minister since Ipsos began tracking in 1977. The instinct from his own side is to blame billionaire-funded misinformation, foreign interference, a hostile press. None of that explains this. The gifts were real, declared in his own name, on the public record, defended by his own minister with the admission that there was nothing to say. The collapse in trust did not need to be manufactured. It was earned, line by line, in the register of members' financial interests, by a Prime Minister who promised the country something his own conduct then failed to deliver.

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

Maybe this might educate you.

He Promised to Clean Up Politics. He Took More Gifts Than Any of Them.

Keir Starmer built his political identity on one promise above all others. After fourteen years of Conservative sleaze, partygate, donor scandals, a Prime Minister fined by police, he would be different. Standards in public life would be restored. The contrast was the entire pitch.

The declared gifts tell a different story. By September 2024, two months into government, Starmer had accepted more than £100,000 in tickets, clothing and accommodation, more than any other recent party leader, Conservative or Labour, on record. Nearly 40 sets of free tickets during his time as Labour leader. £4,000 of Taylor Swift hospitality. £698 for Coldplay. A free four-day holiday to a Welsh beauty spot worth £4,500. From Labour donor Waheed Alli alone, £20,000 of accommodation, £16,000 of work clothing and £2,485 of glasses, while Alli was simultaneously given a pass to Downing Street.

The accommodation deserves closer attention. It was Alli's £18 million Covent Garden penthouse, and Starmer's justification was that his son needed somewhere quiet to revise for GCSEs, away from journalists outside the family home. A sympathetic explanation, until you learn the same penthouse had already been used by Starmer in December 2021 to film a televised "stay home" message to the British public during the pandemic, with family photos and Christmas cards arranged on the shelves behind him to make it appear he was broadcasting from his own house. He told the country to stay in theirs while filming from a borrowed multi-million pound flat dressed to look like somewhere it wasn't.

Compare the total to the people he replaced. Rishi Sunak declared no personal hospitality beyond a £2,595 club membership. Liz Truss recorded four modest items across an entire decade in Parliament, a football match, Wimbledon, an opera and the races, totalling under £4,000. David Cameron's largest declared item was a £4,475 discount on personal training. Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister whose conduct Starmer spent years campaigning against, still didn't approach £100,000 in personal gifts while actually serving in Downing Street. Starmer's total exceeds the combined declarations of several of his predecessors, and he reached it within months of taking office.

When the scale of this became public, Angela Eagle, then a serving minister, was sent to defend it on Times Radio. Asked the simplest possible question, why the Prime Minister couldn't buy his own glasses on his own salary, she said: "I'm afraid I'm not responsible for decisions the Prime Minister makes. I don't have an opinion." No defence was offered because none existed.

Starmer's own justification, that security requirements prevent him from sitting among the public at events, might extend to concerts as well as football matches. It does not explain the Welsh holiday, a private four-day stay with no public stand to avoid. It does not explain the £16,000 of work clothing or the £2,485 glasses, items with no security dimension whatsoever. And it does not explain why a Labour donor was funding his wardrobe while simultaneously holding a Downing Street security pass.

This matters now for a reason beyond the original scandal. Starmer's net approval has since collapsed to minus 66, the worst recorded for any Prime Minister since Ipsos began tracking in 1977. The instinct from his own side is to blame billionaire-funded misinformation, foreign interference, a hostile press. None of that explains this. The gifts were real, declared in his own name, on the public record, defended by his own minister with the admission that there was nothing to say. The collapse in trust did not need to be manufactured. It was earned, line by line, in the register of members' financial interests, by a Prime Minister who promised the country something his own conduct then failed to deliver.

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

I’ll tell you why.

The War started in the 7th Century and lasted through the 17th Century. Many will contend it never stopped; the Facts below are Historically correct.

In 732 A.D., the Muslim Army, which was moving on Paris, was Defeated and turned back at Tours, France, by Charles Martell.
In 1571 A.D., the Muslim Army/Navy was defeated by the Italians and Austrians as they tried to cross the Mediterranean to Attack SouthernEurope in the Battle of Le panto.
In 1683 A.D., the Turkish Muslim Army, attacking Eastern Europe, was finally Defeated in the Battle of Vienna by German and Polish Christian Armies.
This Nonsense has been going on for 1,400 years!?? The SAD thing is that more than half of all Politicians do not even know any of this.

The following events are true historical facts.?? It has been many years since 1968, but History keeps repeating itself.

1. In 1968, Robert Kennedy was Shot and Killed by a Muslim Male.

2. In 1972, at the Munich Olympics, Israeli Athletes were Kidnapped and Massacred by Muslim Males.

3. In 1972, a Pan Am 747 was Hijacked and eventually Diverted to Cairo where a Fuse was lit on Final Approach.?? Shortly after Landing, it was blown up by Muslim Males.

4. In 1973, a Pan Am 707 was Destroyed in Rome With 33 People Killed, when it was Attacked with Grenades by Muslim Males.

5. In 1979, the United States Embassy in Iran was taken over by Muslim Males.

6. During the 1980's, a number of Americans were Kidnapped in Lebanon by Muslim Males.

7. In 1983, the United States Marine Barracks in Beirut was Blown up by Muslim Males.

8. In 1985, the Cruise Ship Achilles-Lauro was Hijacked, and a 70-year-old American Passenger was Murdered and thrown Overboard inhis Wheelchair by Muslim Males.

9. In 1985, TWA Flight 847 was Hijacked at Athens, and a United States Navy Diver, who was trying to Rescue Passengers - was murdered by Muslim Males.

10. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by Muslim Males

11. In 1993, the World Trade Center was Bombed for the First Time by Muslim Males.

12. In 1998, the United States Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were Bombed by Muslim Males.

13. On 09/11/01, FOUR Airliners were Hijacked. Two of the Planes were used as Missiles to take down the World Trade Centers. One Plane Crashed into the United States Pentagon, and the other Plane was Diverted and Crashed by the Passengers. Thousands of People were Killed by Muslim Males.

14. In 2002, the United States fought a War in Afghanistan against Muslim Males.

15. In 2002, reporter Daniel Pearl was Kidnapped and Beheaded by you guessed it - a Muslim Male (Plus two other American Journalists who had just recently been Beheaded.)

16. In 2013, the Boston Marathon Bombing resulted in Four Innocent People, including a Child, being Killed and 264 other People injured by Muslim Males.

17. 22 May 2017 at 9:31 pm BST
The Manchester Arena bombing, or Manchester Arena attack, was an Islamic terrorist suicide bombing of the Manchester Arena in Manchester, England, on 22 May 2017, following a concert by American pop singer Ariana Grande.

NO, I really do not see a pattern here to justify profiling. Do YOU?

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

@ApsanaBegumMP Where was your out pouring for Southport, Manchester Arena attack, 7/7, The Westminster bridge attacks etc etc. We have been living in fear far longer than them.

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

A WORLD HISTORY LESSON WE SHOULD NEVER FORGET!!!

There's a distinct difference between freedom and tolerance, and the lunacy of political correctness and head-in-the-sand ignoring of reality that is working to destroy our country as we know it.

The War started in the 7th Century and lasted through the 17th Century. Many will contend it never stopped; the Facts below are Historically correct.

That is why many of us choke when we hear someone say we will defeat or contain these Islamic Terrorists in a few Years, or even "30 Years" as has been stated by Leon Panetta. If the latest batch of Murders, Beheadings, and killing of Innocent Christians has at all shocked you, it is time for you to read this Compilation of Historical Facts about the Intense Hatred that Muslims have for ANY and ALL who are NOT Muslims!

WE ARE THE STUPID.

In 732 A.D., the Muslim Army, which was moving on Paris, was Defeated and turned back at Tours, France, by Charles Martell.
In 1571 A.D., the Muslim Army/Navy was defeated by the Italians and Austrians as they tried to cross the Mediterranean to Attack SouthernEurope in the Battle of Le panto.
In 1683 A.D., the Turkish Muslim Army, attacking Eastern Europe, was finally Defeated in the Battle of Vienna by German and Polish Christian Armies.

This Nonsense has been going on for 1,400 years!?? The SAD thing is that more than half of all Politicians do not even know any of this.

The following events are true historical facts.?? It has been many years since 1968, but History keeps repeating itself.

1. In 1968, Robert Kennedy was Shot and Killed by a Muslim Male.

2. In 1972, at the Munich Olympics, Israeli Athletes were Kidnapped and Massacred by Muslim Males.

3. In 1972, a Pan Am 747 was Hijacked and eventually Diverted to Cairo where a Fuse was lit on Final Approach.?? Shortly after Landing, it was blown up by Muslim Males.

4. In 1973, a Pan Am 707 was Destroyed in Rome With 33 People Killed, when it was Attacked with Grenades by Muslim Males.

5. In 1979, the United States Embassy in Iran was taken over by Muslim Males.

6. During the 1980's, a number of Americans were Kidnapped in Lebanon by Muslim Males.

7. In 1983, the United States Marine Barracks in Beirut was Blown up by Muslim Males.

8. In 1985, the Cruise Ship Achilles-Lauro was Hijacked, and a 70-year-old American Passenger was Murdered and thrown Overboard inhis Wheelchair by Muslim Males.

9. In 1985, TWA Flight 847 was Hijacked at Athens, and a United States Navy Diver, who was trying to Rescue Passengers - was murdered by Muslim Males.

10. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by Muslim Males

11. In 1993, the World Trade Center was Bombed for the First Time by Muslim Males.

12. In 1998, the United States Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were Bombed by Muslim Males.

13. On 09/11/01, FOUR Airliners were Hijacked. Two of the Planes were used as Missiles to take down the World Trade Centers. One Plane Crashed into the United States Pentagon, and the other Plane was Diverted and Crashed by the Passengers. Thousands of People were Killed by Muslim Males.

14. In 2002, the United States fought a War in Afghanistan against Muslim Males.

15. In 2002, reporter Daniel Pearl was Kidnapped and Beheaded by you guessed it - a Muslim Male (Plus two other American Journalists who had just recently been Beheaded.)

16. In 2013, the Boston Marathon Bombing resulted in Four Innocent People, including a Child, being Killed and 264 other People injured by Muslim Males.

17. 22 May 2017 at 9:31 pm BST
The Manchester Arena bombing, or Manchester Arena attack, was an Islamic terrorist suicide bombing of the Manchester Arena in Manchester, England, on 22 May 2017, following a concert by American pop singer Ariana Grande.

NO, I really do not see a pattern here to justify profiling. Do YOU?

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

SOCIALISM AT IT’S FINEST !
1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

Prove it to be a lie where are your facts ? Or you just don’t like the truth ? Because that’s what lefties do. It’s either there way or not at all.

SOCIALISM AT IT’S FINEST !
1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

Ah Didums are you jealous that some people do well in life ?

SOCIALISM AT IT’S FINEST !
1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

Oh dear oh dear, some do live in a fantasy world.

He Promised to Clean Up Politics. He Took More Gifts Than Any of Them.

Keir Starmer built his political identity on one promise above all others. After fourteen years of Conservative sleaze, partygate, donor scandals, a Prime Minister fined by police, he would be different. Standards in public life would be restored. The contrast was the entire pitch.

The declared gifts tell a different story. By September 2024, two months into government, Starmer had accepted more than £100,000 in tickets, clothing and accommodation, more than any other recent party leader, Conservative or Labour, on record. Nearly 40 sets of free tickets during his time as Labour leader. £4,000 of Taylor Swift hospitality. £698 for Coldplay. A free four-day holiday to a Welsh beauty spot worth £4,500. From Labour donor Waheed Alli alone, £20,000 of accommodation, £16,000 of work clothing and £2,485 of glasses, while Alli was simultaneously given a pass to Downing Street.

The accommodation deserves closer attention. It was Alli's £18 million Covent Garden penthouse, and Starmer's justification was that his son needed somewhere quiet to revise for GCSEs, away from journalists outside the family home. A sympathetic explanation, until you learn the same penthouse had already been used by Starmer in December 2021 to film a televised "stay home" message to the British public during the pandemic, with family photos and Christmas cards arranged on the shelves behind him to make it appear he was broadcasting from his own house. He told the country to stay in theirs while filming from a borrowed multi-million pound flat dressed to look like somewhere it wasn't.

Compare the total to the people he replaced. Rishi Sunak declared no personal hospitality beyond a £2,595 club membership. Liz Truss recorded four modest items across an entire decade in Parliament, a football match, Wimbledon, an opera and the races, totalling under £4,000. David Cameron's largest declared item was a £4,475 discount on personal training. Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister whose conduct Starmer spent years campaigning against, still didn't approach £100,000 in personal gifts while actually serving in Downing Street. Starmer's total exceeds the combined declarations of several of his predecessors, and he reached it within months of taking office.

When the scale of this became public, Angela Eagle, then a serving minister, was sent to defend it on Times Radio. Asked the simplest possible question, why the Prime Minister couldn't buy his own glasses on his own salary, she said: "I'm afraid I'm not responsible for decisions the Prime Minister makes. I don't have an opinion." No defence was offered because none existed.

Starmer's own justification, that security requirements prevent him from sitting among the public at events, might extend to concerts as well as football matches. It does not explain the Welsh holiday, a private four-day stay with no public stand to avoid. It does not explain the £16,000 of work clothing or the £2,485 glasses, items with no security dimension whatsoever. And it does not explain why a Labour donor was funding his wardrobe while simultaneously holding a Downing Street security pass.

This matters now for a reason beyond the original scandal. Starmer's net approval has since collapsed to minus 66, the worst recorded for any Prime Minister since Ipsos began tracking in 1977. The instinct from his own side is to blame billionaire-funded misinformation, foreign interference, a hostile press. None of that explains this. The gifts were real, declared in his own name, on the public record, defended by his own minister with the admission that there was nothing to say. The collapse in trust did not need to be manufactured. It was earned, line by line, in the register of members' financial interests, by a Prime Minister who promised the country something his own conduct then failed to deliver.

[Patriots Corner @PatriotsCorner1]

SOCIALISM AT IT’S FINEST !
1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.