Female furry/Poketuber/artist/crafter/ gamer. I like being a goofball and potato. Sonas:Pawsouls the female wolf & Theo the male wolf-dragon
telegram:@pawsouls
BEWARE @/xtrivatex @/Trivate_
@/XenforoRed/Xenforo
(Best view on desktop)
I know people have heard mixed stories/lies from this guy, here my partner & I experience, cw: narcissist behavior, rape/molestation, constant gaslighting/manipulation, invasion
https://t.co/yyGY5dWRZs
This is the lottery entry post for a Chaos Rising Booster Bundle and First Partner Series 2 Collection for BULK TRADE ONLY. NO CASH. PLEASE READ the full post and extra info reply.
Please only enter this if you know you will have enough bulk to cover the amount in full. Please DO NOT submit your form unless I DM you saying you won.
Each bundle will be $50 in bulk trade value. 1 bundle per winner. 5 Total Winners. Winners will be selected Tuesday June 23rd! To enter, be following me and retweet this post.
@CardGameNomad Like if this was all it took for them to block me, like I didn't even open up a case or return, then damn 😞 didn't know asking a genuine question would result in them blocking me...kinda disheartening
@CardGameNomad Oh,probably cause they advertised something as sealed but when I got it, it wasn't sealed, plastic wrap gone & all. I asked if maybe I can just get a refunded difference since market was different from sealed vs open, they said no and I kinda just left it at that like "oh well"
Bricks and Minifigs - from BAD to WORSE!
This is the body cam footage of the Utah police talking to the former franchisee about the Bricks and Minifigs (BAM) Reckless Ben situation.
The man puts the CEO of BAM, Ammon McNeff, on the phone. McNeff says a number of interesting things:
1) He ADMITS that the family is owed the money, but denies that he or the new franchisee owe it.
I reserve the right to be mistaken, but my understanding of franchise law is that although the franchisor is typically NOT liable for the debts of the franchisee, there are circumstances under which they can be - e.g. if they exercise sufficient control over the franchisee, such that the franchisee can be considered an “agent” under the law.
Given the degree of involvement the CEO is displaying with the new franchisee (the guy holding the phone), that argument might be made here.
2) He ADMITS the money is owed, but claims that Ben (Reckless Ben) has no interest in it.
This too is not necessarily true if the owner of the LEGOs assigned his claim to Ben. But set that possibility aside…
3) McNeff says that Ben and the others threatened to kill someone, attempted to commit extortion, and other serious crimes.
Again, under reserve of the right to be wrong, while it’s not illegal to lie per se to an officer in Utah, my understanding is that it is illegal to make false statements with the intention of getting officers to conduct official acts (i.e. press charges).
With the accusations he is making - that Ben threatened to kill someone! - McNeff might be getting close to that line.
4) McNeff ADMITS the money is owed, but claims the former franchisee broke all sorts of rules in contracting with the LEGO owner, which is why the franchisor terminated their agreement.
Depending on the knowledge of the misconduct of the franchisee, that might be another argument for the potential liability of corporate - if they knowingly let the franchisee break rules to the detriment / fraud of customers.
All that to say, the more McNeff talks, the more damage he causes to the brand and goodwill of BAM - even if Reckless Ben did cross certain lines.
@Doogs97x I actually started selling the same stickers at card shows for $3 each since there nothing in the usa with all the designs and I thought that was crazy