2nd crypto related lawsuit of the day...
Conference of State Bank Supervisor v OCC - Challenging the OCC’s creation of a new special-purpose national bank charter for nonbank companies (specifically re Figure Technologies Inc).
https://t.co/OH3aSv4t2x
@QuandoMondo1@GOTXRP @AlexCobb_ @SEC_News Agreed. The SEC should have done this years ago (2017 at the latest)... before that, perhaps there just wasn't enough money/attention to justify). Instead, they let the founders keep dumping into the market. You should take a look at @stephendpalley's breakdown of the complaint.
@QuandoMondo1@GOTXRP @AlexCobb_ @SEC_News Haven't looked, but I doubt securities enforcement is net revenue producing for the government. Penalties often go to victims (and I assume many penalties are never paid).
@Pucci1967@thisisbull8 @AlexCobb_ @SEC_News@stephendpalley has put in the work over on his feed, and I generally agree with what he's saying. Re: what it means for XRP specifically (not Ripple)... that's probably the most interesting question and we can't really look to traditional securities enforcement for parallels...
@thisisbull8 @AlexCobb_ @SEC_News Neither FinCEN nor the CFTC have authority to determine whether something is a security. Didiuk could easily be representing Ripple as outside counsel at PC. Talking points favorable to clients are part of the job.
@nic_carter But from a non-legal perspective, XRP holders would probably be best off in the long run if the SEC just put it out of its misery. Maybe that will lead to a few of them getting on board with #Bitcoin sooner than later.
@nic_carter What will be interesting to see is how much the SEC tries to protect XRP buyers/holders while prosecuting Ripple. In a traditional securities enforcement action, it's hard to take down the company without taking down the securities. It's a little bit different here...