Rooster Payne

GenX, Veteran, father, business owner, and patriot.

[Rooster Payne @PayneRooster]

@vermilionvixxxn Id grow looking at those too.. 😋 see what I did there.. 🤣

[Rooster Payne @PayneRooster]

@TrumpDailyPosts Before any foreign policy, war, or even fraud.. lobbying is the true cancer on the United States..

[CRIXUS @CRIXUSwasHERE]

CORRECT!!👇💯🤔

[🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 @Real_RobN]

Here it is:

Joe Rogan goes into a state of shock:

“The Social Security number in the United States is used as a de facto national ID number—to get paid and to vote.”

Elon Musk exposes the real reason Democrats never removed the dead from the Social Security rolls: those identities were being used to send fraudulent payments to illegal aliens.

Eliminating those names would cut off payments across every other benefit program they’re funneling to illegal aliens.

@elonmusk: “What they forgot to mention is they’re getting fraudulent payments from every other government program. And that’s why the Dems were so opposed to turning off, to declaring someone dead who was dead, because it would stop all the other fraud from happening.”

“Widespread fraud—hundreds of billions of dollars—it’s mind-blowing.”

——————

Illegal aliens were issued Social Security numbers by the Biden–Harris terrorist administration:

• 270,425 in 2021
• 590,193 in 2022
• 964,163 in 2023
• 2,095,247 in 2024—on their way out the door. Yet they oppose national voter ID.

📝 By the way—they’re also linking ballots to the dead within their corrupt, filthy voter rolls. If you were around in 2020, you know exactly what I’m talking about.

[Colion Noir @MrColionNoir]

A federal court just ruled that suppressors are protected arms under the Second Amendment.

Good win.

But that’s not even the biggest part.

The real story is what this ruling may do to magazine bans, AR bans, and every “hardware” ban anti-gun states have been protecting for years.

Because the Ninth Circuit has been saying things like magazines are just accessories.

Not arms.

Not protected.

Basically a fashion accessory for your rifle.

But now the Fifth Circuit looked at suppressors and said:

No.

If it helps you use your firearm for lawful self-defense, it can be protected by the Second Amendment.

That creates a problem.

A big one.

Two federal courts are now looking at the same kind of argument and reaching opposite conclusions.

That’s called a circuit split.

And that may be exactly what finally forces the Supreme Court to step in.

So this isn’t just about suppressors.

This could be the case that puts magazine bans and assault weapons bans directly on the Supreme Court’s doorstep.

Now be honest:

Should suppressors, magazines, and AR-15s all be protected under the Second Amendment?

Or should the government get to call them “accessories” and ban them?

Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still thinks suppressors work like they do in movies.

[Jacob Metzger @MasterHuzzah]

This is a superior post on the trajectory of humanity’s future🤖

[Rooster Payne @PayneRooster]

@AmericaPapaBear I don't like the way he says any words...

[Rooster Payne @PayneRooster]

@CherieBeneteau Timeshare payment on Zelinsky's big fancy ranch...

[Rooster Payne @PayneRooster]

@coffee_anytime Nope.. and I've proven through an ancestry test that there is a unique DNA that only comes from the US

[Rooster Payne @PayneRooster]

@SGTWipper1Each Our Sergeant Major was the scary one

[HustleBitch @HustleBitch_]

🚨 THE CEO OF FLOCK JUST SAID THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD — AND PEOPLE ARE LOSING IT

Remember when Flock cameras were only supposed to read license plates?
Apparently that's not enough anymore.

Now we're talking about AI that can find a vehicle from a simple description.

Microphones that are always listening for so called "sounds of distress."

Drones that can be launched automatically after a 911 call.

And camera networks that can follow movement across entire cities.

Every year the cameras get smarter.
The databases get bigger.
The AI gets more powerful.
And the amount of information being collected keeps growing.

Then came the comment that really got people's attention.

The CEO behind Flock, one of the largest camera networks in America reportedly compared people who map camera locations to terrorists.

Think about that for a second.

The cameras aren't the problem.
The people tracking the cameras are.

Some people see a tool that makes communities safer.
Others see a system that knows where you've been, where you are, and eventually where you're likely to go next.

If mapping Flock cameras makes you a "terrorist," what does that make the people putting cameras everywhere?

[American Nightmare 🇺🇸 @thewakeninq]

5 things we have to do to put America on the old patway:

1-Abolish the IRS
2-Restore original voting requirements
3-Deport illegals
4-Denaturalize the ones who shouldn’t be here
5-Privatize education

[Rooster Payne @PayneRooster]

@Mrgunsngear Im not buying these stories... if you count all the news stories about cops using the flock cameras for "personal" "illegal" activities, mostly stalking ex's, then we are to believe that at least one third of all police officers are stalkers...
Stop the lies media!!

[BelannF @BelannF]

EVS ARE BEING FORCED ON CITIZENS, BUT HAVE THE BRIANIACS THOUGHT THIS THROUGH?

Will the ranchers who care for animals survive? Will the animals survive the ideas of the people who are so very much smarter than those who live and work in the rural areas? Probably not if the braniacs get their way.

Maybe those who work in Silicon Valley and those who preach 'Green Energy" are not as intelligent as they think.

This is one way to kill the beef industry - the ranchers - the farmers and others - After all, the only people that matter are those living in the big cities, right?

[Colion Noir @MrColionNoir]

“Why do you need an AR-15?”

Ask the police.

Because they have them.

They have the rifles.

They have the 30-round magazines.

They have the gear politicians keep saying is too dangerous for you.

And nobody asks them why they need it.

Why?

Because the answer is obvious:

They carry it to confront violent people.

But here’s the part everyone skips…

Who meets that violent person first?

You do.

The cop shows up after the threat starts.

You’re the one already there.

No badge.

No backup.

No radio.

No team.

And the Supreme Court has already said police do not have a constitutional duty to protect you as an individual.

So if the state keeps these tools for the people who arrive second…

Why does it want to take them from the person who has to survive first?

That’s the question.

Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still asks, “Why do you need that?”

[Rooster Payne @PayneRooster]

@Real_Ninja_Girl You're awesome! 🤣😂😋

[M2 @Amer1can_Barbie]

Good morning 😃

[The Redheaded libertarian @TRHLofficial]

DID YOU KNOW Joni Ernst is trying to slip an act into the Senate Farm Bill that would negate EVERY SINGLE STATE LAW for food safety, local ag, and livestock welfare? Well now you do.
And we have to stop her.