Everybody's jumping on the prose, but as a piece of scientific writing, the reasoning level of the essay is extremely bad too.
She writes:
"Women naturally want to do womanly things because God has created us with those womanly desires in our hearts"
A sentence like this is circular and literally means nothing.
Imagine going to Wikipedia to learn about cats only for the cat behavior section to read:
Cats want to do cat things because God has created them with catly desires in their heart.
And the whole essay is like that.
I’m not sure why people outside of academia are convinced that you’d be banned from a liberal arts university if you referenced the Bible. At Harvard, I took an entire class on the Bible, and my knowledge from my religious upbringing paid off. You can learn about and discuss the Bible. You just can’t say “The Bible told me so” as your only evidence for an argument and expect to get a good grade in a psychology class. You have to intellectually engage with the material…. 🤦♀️
I'm a single issue voter, I want the warm lights back.
Streetlights are too blue. Headlights are too bright. It's a crime against nature and God.
We need to demand 2800K or below color balance for all outdoor lights. Some cities regulate 3000k max, that's still too damn blue.
“What’s your Hozier yell moment?”
“Honestly being voted through”
“I’ve been making television for a long time but I have not felt THIS loved. It’s like a giant Valentine dropped from the sky”
Oh Andy🥹🥹 #dwts
And so after a couple years of chaos and controversy, running an entire school system into the ground and leading a state where nobody now wants to teach, knowing he won’t win reelection, Walters quits his job. The biggest loser in American education.
Jesus didn’t say:
If they’re immigrants, deport them.
If they’re queer, correct them.
If they’re Muslim, reject them.
Jesus said:
If they’re hungry, feed them.
If they’re sick, care for them.
If they’re strangers, welcome them.