@ItsTheEnforcer why would they attack europe that has 4x population and 20x the gdp,baltics and finland maybe but i wanna see the western young men voluntering for the meat grinder,its not gonna happen unless its their country
@Tatarigami_UA China has the manpower and industrial power to take it, they can just naval blockaid it for 2 months and force a surrender since people on Taiwan would starve and economy colapse due to fuel shortages without firing a shot.
@ItsTheEnforcer USA already operates on heavy deficits each year so this would be like a knife between ribs, maybe not having +2x Russian whole yearly budget as defence spending might help you with your dept and budget, so such emergency measures are possible
@BillHarry14763@squatsons there was a treaty about strategic bombers not being hidden when on airfields that usa and russia has or had so you couldn't have them in hangars hidden
@RyanO_ChosenCoy Wouldn't this just give Russia a reason to sink every Ukrainian grain or normal ship going into or out of Ukrainian ports? It would be a dangerous move, but more port strikes or ship strikes would stretch Ukrainian resources.
@IuliiaMendel you do realize their deployed force in ukraine is +700K right? few hundreth a day is rounding error, such combat operations even with 100% fatality rate wouldnt stop them even if marginally close to 50%
@Stan11ey@The_Real_ITDUDE i have seen 2 fpvs with rpg warheads mobility kill and blow the ammo inside with second hit, and the crew was running for their lifes and all four were torn apart by followed up drones since they couldnt hide or run away and died horibly. Being tank crew is death sentence.
@NKaradzha@Rebel44CZ Problem with you theory there isnt a single battlefield advantage that AFU has and they are unable to fullfill manpower needs to even sustain the war, there isnt a single metric they could gain advantage if they simply lack the bodies and nobody will send over gear like its 2023.
@M0nstas its just natural level of circular encirclement that makes defensive operational atritional enough for the attacking side making UAF unable to replenish vehicles and manpower and outpace the loses they can mobilize while attaking side acepting own atritional and win on paper