@TReverie You're free to have unrealistic hopes. Also, a person that wishes for the Chinese nation to disintegrate (which carries catastrophic consequences) doesn't get to call themselves "Chinese".
@PetGoatAlfred@Belorris In international law, there are no excuses and mental gymnastics. A direct armed attack against a sovereign country is a violation of the UN Charter and you're entitled to retaliation within the confines of international law (no war crimes).
Keyword: Direct armed attack.
@DaveChong18@Belorris That's not international law. The UN Charter doesn't say that you can attack a country because they said some words you didn't like.
@lshredder42@RafaelH117 A belligerent nation that violated international law multiple times and an administration that the ICC accused of war crimes is currently hosting the FIFA world cup, yet you choose to be a hypocrite.
Remember there's still no hard evidence to support the accusations against China
@derrick_dao@FT There's more risk of dependency on oil suppliers than green energy tech suppliers, because once you buy solar panels, the infrastructure built doesn't burn away.
@KofiOnX@joyscript8@DeborahYeboah16 Except it wasn't a survey. They're just repeating data from population and housing census from countries.
And methodology is very important when you want to assess the veracity of any data out there.
Validity and reliability of the data collection tools?
@PeanutsRevenge@giantsnation1_0@ImpermanentLos@damsel_sumerian@kirawontmiss What's false here are your claims about China backed by no solid evidence.
China's success hurts the egos of sinophobes to the point that their childish coping mechanism is to find ways to demonize and undermine China, as if that will stop China's rise 🤣. https://t.co/95UfcYR7JZ