@CambsResid18239@FedeManfredo Like I said Eze didn't protect the ball.
The ball was in contention, and he stepped in shoulder to shoulder and won the ball fair and square.
@ESchwaa@FedeManfredo But Konsa doesn't touch the ball instead he impeads Prince's chances of shooting.
There's no argument here except you're trying to form an agenda.
That's a stonewall penalty on any day
@deejayfaremi@Sheikhspeare_x The team playing for him actually means he doesn't have to be everywhere or try to do everything.
When the team plays for you then you should just focus on getting yourself to places where the team need you to finish.
@Martinelli_Bx@Wizarab10 The fact they still scored doesn't mean I'm the defenders made the wrong decision.
Even Vidic that's known for jumping on attackers wouldn't even dare that there.
Anyone who plays football even at armature would know this very easily.
@Martinelli_Bx@Wizarab10 It's actually the correct thing to do. You close him down he releases the ball and suddenly it's 4 vs 1
Bye retreating you give your team the option of retreating players coming to help and put doubt in the the ball carrier's head.
@Polymath_16 You're the one confusing them.
DM is the position DLP is the role.
For instance Vitinha is PSGs DM but his role is not a ball winner but a DLP.
@unseriousguru@blaq_en_belle And this is an exception.
The general rule is that parents love their children more than anyone else would.
When arguing a general rule don't site an exception as your example if not it makes your argument dumb.
@debosamuel99@SirChucho Guy, you dey slow.
The OP is been sarcastic, he knows Bruno won't have time to entertain those questions.
You dun rush insult am.