@anubhav4sure@thewarriorpoet7 you know top 1% of this country which is 99% general category has has 40% wealth and top 10% has around 70% wealth which is majority of upper caste , you all are still crying , then you think where this hatred comes from . meanwhile dalits are still beaten as per NCRB report
@anubhav4sure@thewarriorpoet7 you people are crying over 80% population having 50% reservation , but your less than 10% population which comes under EWS criteria getting 10% reservation .
Yes there is a hatred and will always be there cuz even after thousands of yrs of loot , you are still crying
@anubhav4sure@thewarriorpoet7 prohibiting majority of population to study / learn warcraft / dividing works , you already decided who will have wealth and who will not , even if someone worked hard , he was competing against barely 10% , thats called 100% reservation
These are clear facts not assumptions
@anubhav4sure@thewarriorpoet7 you can call it hatred but how it is casteism , someday you would call a r*pe victim a r*pist or stalker since she has hatred towards the culprit
Ik everyone's wealth isnt looted but majority is
@anubhav4sure@thewarriorpoet7 yes if he would be treated the same way and with all the respect that a brahmin is getting from society
+ every upper caste will have to leave the benefits they got from their previous generations by looting money aka generational wealth,if they can do it then remove reservation
@anubhav4sure@thewarriorpoet7 just say it you are a casteist and move on before giving your bs enlightenment to others
and dont even say anything about lynching , ik who are getting lynched in the name of beef and caste discrimination .
@anubhav4sure@thewarriorpoet7 lol these bigots hahaha so if a lower caste person is following the same dietary requirements but still he wont be eligible to become priest meanwhile a person who is from brahmin family did everything including non veg diet he will be eligible , so how is that reverse bias
@anubhav4sure@thewarriorpoet7 aur ye rigorous life hai toh ek kaam kr bhut villages me abhi bhi chala jaa jahan SC ST ko same level pe baithne nhi dete , honour killings hoti hn , khana brahmins ke pahle nhi khane dete
first get the feel of this type of behaviour then blabber shit
@anubhav4sure@thewarriorpoet7 lol hahaha rigorous life of following vegetarianism and have a janaeu ? thats what you rigorous life is ? There are many in OBC SC ST who follow vegetarianism and even some OBCs follow janaeu , meanwhile some of my brahmin friends eat non veg so double standards ?
@darkandcrude@subhavsamarth well you just need common sense to find out answer of your rtrdrd question.
15% population owning majority of wealth and ranks in elite jobs ,meanwhile 80% population majority of which is poor , not only financially backward but also socially
& you are asking why reservation?๐
"๐๐๐จ๐๐ง๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐๐จ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ง๐"- ๐๐๐๐จ ๐ข๐๐ฃ๐๐จ๐๐ฉ ๐๐จ ๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐๐๐ฃ'๐จ ๐ฝ๐ช๐ง๐๐๐ฃ: ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ง๐จ๐๐ค๐ฃ.
Since a lot of less educated anti-reservationists also read my posts, let me start with basics.
What is 'White Man's Burden'?
In short, the Britishers used to consider themselves superior & they believed that the colonies they ruled, in India, Africa etc needed their guidance to come out of the 'barbarianism' and uncivilised cultures. For example, the Britishers believed that Indians cannot rule India as Indians lack knowledge, expertise, advanced civilisational values etc and Britishers need to guide Indians always. This the Britishers used to call as "white man's burden"- The burden to uplift others.
Let us now come to the main point. Why do I associate the British concept of white man's burden with anti- reservation mindset in India?
For this, let us see the past 500 years of Indian history in our context.
During Mughal rule, when elite muslims & upper caste Hindus used to dominate India's politics, resources, economy, education & every other aspect, we Indians were never able to make any scientific advancement. At exact same time, Europe went through Industrial revolution, which is considered to be one of the greatest achievements of humankind.
Now, when asked why India could not do its own Industrial revolution, Anti- reservationists blame its lack of achievement on Mughal rule. Although it is very well known that 'general caste' Hindus dominated Mughal sultanate. Birbal, Tansen, Todarmal etc. were considered 9 gems (navratan) of Mughals & yet, we could not achieve Industrial revolution during Mughal rule.
(There was No reservation then).
After that, comes British rule. During this period also, Indians could not achieve much scientific advancement. We could achieve nothing major in the 200 years of British era & anti- reservationists blame British rule for this. Although Britishers did not stop Indians from taking education, as evident by achievements of Netaji Subhash Bose who cleared ICS exam or Meghnad Saha's achievement in astronomy. Although these are rare but proves that Indians had access to education but we again could not achieve much.
(There was no reservation then).
After British rule, when India got free and we started our own IITs, for 25 years, from 1950-1975, there was zero reservation in IITs. All seats were open for general category. Still, the anti-reservationists could not win a single nobel prize or bring any significant scientific advancement. For this failure, the anti-reservation lobby blame socialist policies & lack of funding. But we can see that during same time, very small countries like Czechoslovakia and Japan won nobel prizes in science.
(There was no reservation then).
After 1975, only 22% seats in IITs were reserved for SC/STs. During this period also, no major scientific achievement was made by Anti- reservation lobby and for this failure, they blame 22% reservation, even though 78% seats were open for general.
From 1975 till 2008, only 22% seats were reserved and anti-reservationists could achieve nothing with 78% open seats. So, what could they have achieved after 2008 when 27% seats were given to OBCs?
Hahaha , again, Nothing. ๐
Except one thing. They achieved one thing surely. "A stronger loser mindset."
Well, atleast the white men achieved scientific advancements before claiming the concept of white man's burden. The Anti- reservationists achieved nothing and yet claim they are born to lead the society based on 'merit'.
This is worse that White Man's Burden. This is the rock of casteist feudal mindset that is being erored by the river of education, vigorously, as shown in pic below.
๐ฏ
#Reservation
(Pic from google)
@nethrapal@Profdilipmandal@drsandeepdu@tavleen_singh@TheJonyVerma
@ZamenaceDennis@BharatS99674801@midwaythoughts_@Starboy2079 even with 50-60 kg , it will definitely slow down anyone warrior , and in early war , you had to fight against several opponents at the same time with good reflexes to dodge from every direction
@ZamenaceDennis@BharatS99674801@midwaythoughts_@Starboy2079 Officially written info in museum is that his swords were 2.5 kg each ,armour around 10 kg & spear around 5
thats it he was around 6'5''
These stories are just bs,even with that height and weight he would be an awesome fighter but dont exaggerate it like seriously bro that dumb
@ZamenaceDennis@BharatS99674801@midwaythoughts_@Starboy2079 first of all Udaipur museum has all his equipments armour , and thats just bs , there is literally no evidence of him being that tall , and lifting such heavy .
just imagine a sword of 25 kg , thats so dumb if anyone believes that .
just tell me how will you make sword of 25kg?
@Yash_sama24@FuckOff6307@Rohit00321@DippaDippaDippa@Starboy2079 laude baman bsdk gaali dena ata hai , chutiye 300+ kg ke sath koi ldne jayega , aur Udaipur museum me sb kuch rkha hai gaandu , vahan pr swords ka 2.5 kg weight hai
koi rtrd tere jaisa hi sochega ki 82 kg ka spear lololol