Peter Maxwell

[JD Vance @JDVance]

Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.

Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.

It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children. And nobody—nobody—should ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.

[Peter Maxwell @PeterBMaxwell]

JD Vance sums it up so well.

[Allison Pearson @AllisonPearson]

JD Vance, US Vice President, suggests anger is the correct response to the vile, inhumane way British police treated Henry Nowak as he lay dying.
Our country is shamed and reviled because police stopped protecting the innocent.

[Liza Rosen @LizaRosen0000]

Keir Starmer recognized “Palestine” after they murdered over 1,000 Jews and kidnapped hundreds more on October 7.

He didn’t do it for peace. He did it to calm his panicked Muslim voters.

In the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, Starmer saw an opportunity — not to stand with the victims, but to reward the Muslim murderers with international legitimacy.

He chose Muslim votes over Jewish lives.

His legacy will forever stain Britain’s history!

[Peter Maxwell @PeterBMaxwell]

Appalling and disgusting photograph. Associated Press should be ashamed of themselves.

[Alex Gandler @AlexGandler]

Palestinian propaganda agents disguising themselves as pseudo-journalists win an award for taking pictures of dead Israelis while their "comrades" are seen celebrating the kidnapping of a young 22-year-old Israeli-German dual citizen, Shani Louk.

Shame on you @AP, instead of a reward these agents need to be prosecuted for war crimes.

for more information regarding Palestinians dressing up as journalists read the report: "More than half of the Palestinian journalists killed in the Gaza Strip during Operation Iron Swords were affiliated with terrorist organizations"

https://t.co/d6lo1UqL8O

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

Henry Nowak was an 18 year-old student on a night out in Southampton.

He was brutally stabbed with a 21cm ceremonial knife carried by a Sikh man.

The footage released last night is deeply distressing and has shocked us all.

As Henry lay bleeding out on the ground, the police arrested him on an accusation of a racial slur.

When he told officers that he could not breathe and that he had been stabbed, an officer can be heard saying “I don’t think you have, mate”.

Rather than attempt to save this young man’s life, the police were more interested in an accusation of racism.

The last thing Henry heard was being read his rights as he was arrested.

When the police are more concerned with an allegation about words potentially said than the fact that a young man has suffered a fatal knife wound, the extent of the mess our police are in is laid bare.

Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary have some serious questions to answer.

[Matt Goodwin @GoodwinMJ]

Rupert Lowe & Restore want you to think they are the "only ones" dealing with tough issues like the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs.

But this is classic Restore - it's all smoke & mirrors.

It is a lot of online buzz with not a lot behind the shop window (like many of their other policies).

Let me be clear.

Like 99.9% of British people, I want *every single* public official who turned a blind eye to the rape gangs sacked and if possible imprisoned.

I was also the first person in British politics to advocate for the deportation of dual nationals involved in the rape gangs (which later become official Reform policy at the 2024 general election - see below).

The truth is this.

The rape gang victims & their families will simply never get the truth & justice they deserve unless we (a Reform government) hold a STATUTORY government.

Only a statutory rape gang inquiry can legally force witnesses to appear, can compel organisations & people to hand over evidence, can punish with legal sanctions those who refuse to comply, can gain full access to witnesses & records.

Nigel Farage and Reform know this.

Rupert Lowe, instead, went for the quicker & cheaper option which got him a lot of online clicks, attention, and money but is much less serious.

Once you go down this path outside the Inquiries Act 2005 you simply do not have the serious statutory powers you need to get the rape gang scandal sorted once & for all.

If anything, Lowe is helping the establishment.

Now, there are still things that somebody working outside the Inquiries Act could do that's useful - like collecting all the testimonies of victims and making them publicly available.

But what it will 100% NOT be able to do is draw definitive conclusions, show you which institutions failed, show you who is responsible, and compel the evil people who allowed this to happen to speak before the British public (and suffer consequences).

Why do I draw attention to all this?

Because as with many other areas -- the borders, legal migration, deportations, etc. -- I care deeply about the issue but as with all things Restore I am sick and tired of seeing them pretend to be doing big, virtuous things while lacking the substance & detail to do them right.

Even worse.

Restore activists are now celebrating the fact they are potentially helping the VERY SAME LABOUR PARTY THAT IGNORED THE RAPE GANGS by campaigning in Makerfield, and possibly damaging Reform, which is the ONLY party that will deliver the full, statutory inquiry those girls demand and deserve.

That tells you all you need to know.

They hate Nigel Farage so much they would RATHER keep the same Labour Party that ignored & enabled the rape gangs in power.

It is classic Restore. And it is disgusting.

And when activists tell me "but we will deport anybody in Britain who knew about it" that is simply not true.

Rupert Lowe is consistently further to the Left than Reform on immigration and deportations.

Just read his interview in The Spectator a few days ago.

He could not even set out a comprehensive policy for dealing with the Boriswave (which Reform has). He said he "didn't want to get into the weeds" of policy.

Again, that is not good enough.

Rupert Lowe and Restore are non-serious. And Britain, the country we love and fear we are losing, simply does not have time for something that is non-serious.

They are not patriots who genuinely care about these issues. They are nihilists & kamikaze pilots.

Only Reform will bring truth and justice on the rape gangs.

Only Reform will deport dual nationals involved in the rape gangs.

Only Reform will impose full life sentences on rape gang criminals.

And only Reform will release within 100 days of entering power every file, email, memo & record by government relating to the rape gang scandal over the last 40 years

Britain, the British people, and the victims of the rape gangs deserve so much better than this.

Vote Reform and let's get it done.

Properly.

[Zia Yusuf @ZiaYusufUK]

White people are now demonstrably the biggest victims of racism in Britain.

[John Cleese @JohnCleese]

I sometimes feel that one of the few improvements
in life on the planet during my life has been the gradual
but steady growth in the importance of women in our society

Now these mediaevalists are trying to reverse that ?

[Daniel Hannan @DanielJHannan]

A reminder that, under our soil, we have 1.5 billion barrels of oil, 150 billion cubic meters of natural gas and 300 years' supply of coal.

https://t.co/8dXQcd78or

[Peter Maxwell @PeterBMaxwell]

Who is the puppet master?

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Mandelson Was Briefed On Britain's China Strategy While Security Services Recommended He Be Denied Clearance.

Peter Mandelson's vetting began on 23 December 2024, three days after Starmer announced him as ambassador. The nine page summary was completed on 28 January 2025 and delivered to the Foreign Office at 1.52pm. It concluded that Mandelson posed a high overall concern and recommended his clearance be denied. Hours later, Olly Robbins granted it anyway.

While that vetting process was still underway, Mandelson was already receiving sensitive Foreign Office briefings on China, including what Philip Barton confirmed must have included the UK government's audit of its China policy. The man the security services said should be denied clearance was being briefed on Britain's most sensitive strategic assessments before the denial recommendation was even delivered.

The Guardian has now confirmed what those concerns contained. Mandelson's links to Lan Fo'an, China's minister of finance. His relationship with Oleg Deripaska, the sanctions-hit Russian oligarch, maintained long after Russia's annexation of Crimea. His bimonthly contact with Tamir Hayman, a former head of Israeli military intelligence. A close relationship with an unnamed British individual described as potentially compromising. A £1 million loan from an unnamed businessman to acquire shares in Moon Active, an Israeli tech company with revenues exceeding £2 billion, not declared in his Lords register entry alongside the investment itself. And a finding that he appeared naive about the risk that historical relationships could be exploited.

Each of those concerns was contained in the nine page summary. Each contributed to a recommendation of clearance denied. Robbins read them all and granted clearance anyway. Within hours.

Now consider what followed. Lan Fo'an, the Chinese finance minister with whom Mandelson spoke several times a year, greeted Starmer on the runway in Beijing in January 2026. Lan met Rachel Reeves in China in January 2025, while Mandelson's vetting was still ongoing. He met Reeves again in Washington in April 2025, by which time Mandelson was in post with Strap Three clearance. The government will now be asked whether Mandelson was involved in any of those meetings and how his undisclosed personal relationship with China's finance minister was managed while he represented Britain in Washington.

That question has not been answered. It may never be answered if the government succeeds in withholding the documents that would allow Parliament to examine it.

The ISC has gone public with its concerns that the government is withholding vetting materials it has no authority to withhold. Jeremy Wright, a KC and former Attorney General, told the Commons that ministers were applying redactions on grounds of commercial sensitivity rather than national security, in potential challenge to parliamentary sovereignty. Emily Thornberry, the Labour chair of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, said obstacles were being placed in the way of efforts to reach the truth. Two MPs have accused the government of a cover-up. One has threatened to table a motion holding ministers in contempt.

Robbins argued the vetting files should remain in a hermetically sealed box. He has been sacked. The files are being withheld anyway by a different mechanism, redaction and non-disclosure, on grounds that have nothing to do with national security.

Ministers must now answer one question above all others. Was any national security harm done during the seven months Mandelson was in Washington with Strap Three clearance, an undisclosed personal relationship with China's finance minister, and a security profile the vetting agency had explicitly said was too dangerous to risk?

The files that would answer that question are being withheld. Parliament has been told it cannot see them. The country has been told to trust the process. The process recommended denial. They proceeded anyway.

[Nigel Farage MP @Nigel_Farage]

I have written to the Charity Commission regarding Hope Not Hate’s political activities.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

Being biologically female means having a body that is observably organised to produce large gametes (eggs), as opposed to a body organised to produce small gametes (sperm). A woman is female whether her eggs have been fertilised or not. A man can never be female.

[J Stewart @triffic_stuff_]

🚨 BLAIR BOMBSHELL: SCRAP NET ZERO NOW! “THERE’S NO LOGIC TO IT!” 🔥

Tony Blair Demands Starmer Scrap Milibands Mad Expensive Green Agenda Immediately‼️

Blair has just shredded mad Miliband and the entire net zero agenda. There’s zero logic to it!

Asked directly for total clarity: “For total clarity, are you advising Keir Starmer to rip up Ed Milibands green energy targets?”

Blair bluntly replied: “Yes I am!”

He explained that the 3 biggest emitters in the world today are China, America and India. Together they “account for just over 50% of global emissions.”

All are pursuing cheap energy. They still do renewable energy. “China for example builds more renewable energy than the rest of the world put together.” “It just means that the lens from which they judge policy is cheap energy.”

He rightly points out Britain’s emissions are “under 1% of global emissions” so we can’t solve climate change.

And says he “doesnt understand the logic behind” imposing costs on businesses and consumers to pursue net zero when the rest of the world is not doing so.

He says again he doesnt understand why we’re shutting down North Sea oil and gas industry in circumstances where no other country in the world is doing that if “they’ve still got a requirement to import energy from oil and gas”.

It costs way too much and “is not the right priority!”

Net zero is not saving the planet. It is economic self-harm. Blair has just blown the entire agenda apart.

[Zac Goldsmith @ZacGoldsmith]

A perfect illustration of how people in positions of authority can be programmed to say literally anything - no matter how absurd - to protect the dogma they’ve been programmed with. This is precisely how terrible things have been able to happen throughout history.

[spiked @spikedonline]

Restore Britain is the maddest party in Britain. It’s a cult of personality that worships Rupert Lowe as the new Richard Lionheart. It is equal parts dumb and sinister, says Brendan O’Neill
https://t.co/LGj1YK4nhh

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

@eNeecie Every other day a new motorhome appears in my mother-in-law's drive and Neil hands me another bucket full of jewellery and cosmetics. I can only assume he's got himself a part time job I'm too busy to ask about.

[Ditzy77 🩵 @Ditzy771]

@Truthhurts101UK Thomas Paine Hotel, Thetford refused to take a single illegal. Give them loads of business, its a beautiful hotel as well 😂👍🥰

[David Turver @7Kiwi]

Starmer relaxes sanctions on fuels refined from Russian oil while closing new North Sea drilling and taxing the rest to oblivion.

[Alastair Hilton @London_W4]

If the courts say that a man can be a woman simply because he says he is, then the whole of society breaks down. Everything becomes meaningless, because if a man can be a woman by saying he is, then a man can say he’s a lion and be a lion. Say he’s a rhino and be a rhino. A three year old child can say they’re an adult and demand to be treated as one in a pub. A mountain may no longer be a mountain; it could be a lettuce if someone has said that it is. You see? A man saying they’re a woman and being told they are by a court renders the whole world insane. And that’s exactly what it is to call a man a woman: insane.

[Peter Maxwell @PeterBMaxwell]

@NoSunnica

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

This isn't just a pile of debris - it’s the future of green energy waste hidden in plain sight.

Millions of solar panels are hitting their end-of-life cycle, and the world is completely unprepared for the coming toxic avalanche. By 2050, the International Renewable Energy Agency projects up to 78 million metric tons of solar e-waste. Where is it all going to go?

The industry boasts that solar panels are '95% recyclable'. Technically, yes - because they are made of glass, aluminum and copper. But economics always trumps physics. In Australia and the US, it costs roughly $20 to $28 to properly disassemble and recycle a single panel, but only about $4 to dump it in landfill.

Because there is no financial incentive, up to 90% of decommissioned panels go straight into the ground.

Each solar panel is an industrial 'sandwich' bound tightly by heavy polymers. To extract the microscopic amounts of valuable silver and high-purity silicon requires energy-intensive chemical and thermal baking.
When they are crushed or left to fracture in landfills, heavy metals like lead and cadmium can leach into the surrounding soil and groundwater, turning 'clean energy' into a multi-generational hazardous waste problem.

The crisis is accelerating faster than models predicted. Because solar cells degrade and lose efficiency, and because newer, cheaper panels hit the market, consumers and solar farms are ripping out functional systems at least a decade early to upgrade.

This compressed lifecycle destroys the narrative of a long-term, stable asset and creates an endless loop of unrecyclable industrial trash.