@johnsweeneyroar@ZackPolanski I agree, this along with a lot of their economics is why I am never likely to vote Green and in spite of working closely with them in Newbury could never join their party. They should stick to a few core messages to gain the popular vote but Zack has raised their profile
The EU is proposing to impose a climate levy on all imports that are heavily reliant on fossil fuels and the Netherlands & Columbia are to start a new group for highly ambitious nations that wish to tackle climate change without the need for consensus of the fossil fuel addicts
The failure of COP30 simply acknowledges the real world: there is no consensus on how to tackle climate change or indeed whether climate change needs to be tackled. However out of this failure there is an opportunity: 1of2
It would appear that Trump is doing Putin's dirty work for him. Exactly what is in it for America or Trump that he seeks to impose surrender terms on Ukraine? @POTUS needs to grow a pair and get tough with Putin with the threat of military intervention. https://t.co/RvsaerWd44
@AllisonPearson You could argue the same about Trump's impending Presidency. Bond Market movements are mirrored over there. Why try to make this a UK only story when clearly global factors are in play?
Why's @elonmusk meddling in European politics? Wouldn't his time and money be better spent solving the problems of his home nation of South Africa? As it is we need a major re-think of media outlets and what constitutes a free press.
Remarkable, @trussliz, supposed advocate of free speech takes a swing at the only media outlets that are independent as opposed to those owned by oligarchs. How free does she want our press? https://t.co/nps8JvDMol
@piersmorgan So you don't distinguish between Louise Haig doing something when not even an MP and Boris Johnson who had just made the law he broke whilst in office?
@sophielouisecc What's the argument, that Greta Thunberg is responsible for our decline? That we should be ignoring the need to move away from fossil fuels? Or that we get the Governments we deserve through our electoral choices?
@piersmorgan Are you being deliberately naive? It is one thing breaking laws whilst in office, quite another to have what appears to be a minor misdemeanour while not in office to then come and haunt you when in office. Do we no longer believe in redemption?
@AllisonPearson Allison, have you yet apologised for retweeting a post that was inaccurate and to which you added defamatory remarks? Merely deleting it is not good enough. Until you take that step your defence of free speech is wanting.
@darrengrimes You always seem to be decrying any initiatives to get us off our reliance on fossil fuels. Are you a denier that we need to take action? If not what are your constructive alternatives?
@RachelReevesMP argues she had no choice in the budget, but it's not true. The issue is she and Starmer allowed themselves to fall into the Tory trap of matching their commitments which they freely gave knowing the election was lost https://t.co/ByehEB7DNx
If this story is true then once again developers will have won and the environmental can kicked yet again down the road โฆ@Ed_Milibandโฉ. At some point houses have to be built that are fit for purpose, if not now, when? https://t.co/I3bltxv4tc