@thecappielowkid Then it’s up to us to ensure that that legal framework of the deal is reflective of the proposal. Yes there’s question marks over some of the characters involved, but now is the time to implement protection from harm legally.
@SJMcCabeKilma Why does WM continually refuse to amend the misuse of drug act to allow Scotland to tackle this issue? The misuse of drugs act of 1971 is a reserved matter, more powers to Scotland would allow us to create special services to take this.
@Chrismcnulty75 Sounds to me like he tried to bypass the democratic process of MCT with his wealth along with another individual, if this had been entertained by MCT it could then be seen as them accepting a bribe as its financial gain in return of influencing decisions.
@onslotton@KenanPerry You’re neglecting the fact that that was the case for the largest jet liner at the time, they were hit by larger planes and under the assumption it was traveling at low speed (ie lost in fog)
@Arkameedeez_@davedurringo22 Many do, but not as a necessity, you still have to admit that the proportion of us nationals taking passports into domestic flights would be lower than non-us nationals, yes?
@Arkameedeez_@davedurringo22 4 of the 19 passports of hijackers were recovered, along with some passengers ones but no one focuses on that because they aren’t as significant to the investigation, but, Barron mind that for the 4 flights Americans would not have generally needed passports for internal flights
@davedurringo22 4 of the piliots held commercial or private pilot certificates for multi engine planes and some had Boeing simulator training. Including Atta, Hanjour, Jarra and al-shehhi. The second claim you make is too broad, the pilots reported difficulty yes but they managed it
@FrancisxONeill@jd_alofa To fix the quote you are misusing,
“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor.”
Is how it’s written in the PNAC document
@FrancisxONeill@jd_alofa You’ve given loose change a whole lot of unjustified credit. PNAC DID want transformative change in the USAs military expansion, but that doesn’t mean they had an active hand in planning the attacks or any other gov agency, it’s the same old play, find tiny unrelated link and run
@terracepodcast@craigfowler86 Also interesting to note he complains about the previous dalrada deal to being akin to “having a gun to our heads” yet fully tried to justify Estrella doing the same thing on the back of contentious claims
@terracepodcast@craigfowler86 So alistairs view is it’s the blame of directors who were asking questions about the deal, were being told “your jobs just to present this to the members”? By who? That’s ridiculous! How can a director take something. That important to its members without being fully informed?
@AndyRossTele Read your original tweet that my issue is with. There’s no indication as to who is quoted and missing context, as a standalone tweet it’s histrionic and dishonest, now I’ve already explained that and you’ve side stepped at every point.
No mention of who this was from, a claim made by Estrellas owner (along with some other false, partial or misleading claims within a 30 minute scaremonger attempt), rebutted later in the evening by a board member.
Seems the sensationalism of the Tele hasn’t left with Dodds.
@AndyRossTele What do you think I’m responding to? you’ve quoted a suggestion from an external source, lacking in context, which if read by itself crates unjust shock and not including the stance of the club on the matter. Which is either extremely bad journalism or deliberately obtuse.
@AndyRossTele Strange that you were reporting on a meeting, were you there tonight because I didn’t see you 🤔Notice how you know how to chain tweets when you need to. I’m sure you report will be balanced (!)
@AndyRossTele As a stand alone tweet, not part of a thread, I’m
Pretty sure you knew what you were doing, you had ample opportunity to report on this as one article where you could be impartial and objective, you chose not to.