I'm Eno. I like building things, figuring out how they work, and sharing what I learn along the way.
Around here, you'll find:
• Real engineering experiments — including the ones that don't go as planned.
• Behind-the-scenes stories from building my own products, including https://t.co/ZDOW4p9BYN and https://t.co/MDj2MCcPSb.
• AI, cloud infrastructure, virtualization, and the occasional deep dive into how things actually work.
• Little moments from everyday life, usually involving my cat. 🐈
I don't have everything figured out, but that's part of the fun.
If you're building something too, I'd love to hear what you're working on.
Hamel Husain shows tuning decision thresholds from 0.50 to optimal can greatly improve failure detection. Default thresholds assume all tasks are equal, but real-world trade-offs between precision and recall mean the right cutoff depends on your goals.
@ilan_kadar@pluraiAI A digital twin is a much better preflight check than another happy-path benchmark. The useful bit will be replaying failures reliably enough to turn “it broke” into a fix, instead of another demo.
@Shohan_Tech_AI The dumbest thing about AI benchmarks is how much they ignore what happens after day one. Like, we’re celebrating "smart" agents that can’t learn from experience or keep anything in memory. Meanwhile, a human would just go "oh right, this is the same thing" and move on.
@Akasheth_ The boring money is probably in narrow AI SaaS and integrations. Vibe coding helps build the thing, but customers usually pay for a painful workflow disappearing, not for the fact that an LLM is somewhere in the stack.
@Sonofpeace0001@Nevermined_ai 200,000 free credits gets agents past the “can I even afford to test this?” stage. The API returning nothing is a useful reminder that billing success and task success are two very different green checks.
@Didotxyz_ Measuring task decomposition is the useful part here. A 36.95% ceiling suggests coordination overhead may be the bottleneck, not a lack of raw agent capability.
@arammelkoumov@crowdlinker 100+ products in 15 years, especially in AI for PMs and finance, is a rare combo of execution and focus. Curious how you’ve scaled the team to keep that pace without burning out.
Lenny's Newsletter shows how William Imoh built a Norwegian tutor with Codex, despite no Swift or Kotlin. The key insight: when agents write code, programming skills matter less than clear product vision.