Common Indian Man

Common Indian man on his quest for gender neutral laws, child rights and justice.

[The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨‍⚖️ @SamSiff]

Legal action should be initiated against such wives.

Wives have no rights to hamper “right to work” of husbands.

Its high time these need to be criminalised…

[SIFF - Save Indian Family Foundation @realsiff]

Hanumant Patil committed suicide at Manchester, UK due fake cases and alimony extortion.

There is no outrage.

He had approached MRAs a few years back. They could only provide him with painkillers. They had no solutions for his problems. Getting out of fake cases and alimony extortion is almost impossible and it mostly depends on luck. Luck ran out for Hanumant. He distanced himself from those who were helping him and then it's just a matter of time.

Lawyers will say,"A dozen legal remedies are available."

Feminists will say,"This is a rare case. How did you know Hanumant did not demand dowry? If a man has done no wrong, he has nothing to fear."

Simps will say,"Think of Twisha Sharma before talking about Hanumant."

[SIFF - Save Indian Family Foundation @realsiff]

@stayaway_002 Denying men protection from domestic violence, sexual harassment and women assaulting men is your definition of equality. 😂

[SIFF - Save Indian Family Foundation @realsiff]

Very bad idea for the man to reconcile with a wife, who filed a dowry case against him.

Because a snake will never change it's nature. She will again file a dowry case with more serious charges in next 2-3 years time.

We are a 20 years old Men's Rights Organization & we have seen this happen countless times.

[︎ ︎venom @venom1s]

We live in a country where a man was fired from his job just for making a joke.

While Nikita Singhania is still working her job and didn't get any punishment.

Sonam Raghuvanshi got bail in a year.

Why is India so biased and hateful towards Indian men?

[The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨‍⚖️ @SamSiff]

@AwanishSharan And later the same father says beti “beti bachao” and “paise dilvao” in courts claiming my daughter is abla and can’t earn.

[Jasveer Singh @jasveer10]

Yesterday I posted something. It triggered some people. Remember - People don’t argue with lies. They ignore them. They argue with the truth.

If something triggered, it touched something real. And the truth always feels like exposure.

Now let me answer the most-asked question: ‘marriage is not about money’

Hear me out. Today, I have some extra time👇

Every family, and I’m repeating it again, every family asks about income, profession, lifestyle, assets, and background before saying yes.

So the real world is already doing the math. I’m just saying it out loud.

People don’t choose partners based on love alone. Whether it’s a love marriage or an arranged marriage, they choose based on a combination of love, money, status, looks, education, values, lifestyle, and security.

Income plays a major role. It always has, and it always will.

Pretending it doesn’t exist doesn’t make it disappear.

Everything in life is transactional. The degree varies, but the transaction never disappears.

People just get uncomfortable when money is part of the transaction because it makes the trade-offs visible.

If marriage wasn’t transactional, why do most women refuse to marry men earning significantly less than them?

Why is salary discussed before commitment? Why do families ask about income before compatibility? Why does profession matter before the first meeting?

That’s not a criticism. That’s reality. The transaction exists whether you acknowledge it or not. Some people see it clearly. Some people prefer not to see it.

And yes, of course, exceptions exist. They do in every field. Every group has 5-7% of people who operate differently. I’m talking about majority patterns, not exceptions.

[SIFF - Save Indian Family Foundation @realsiff]

@AishwaryakiRai When did feminists view suicides of men with same kind of sensitivity as they view suicides of women?

You prove our assertion that Indian women have too many one sided expectations.

[The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨‍⚖️ @SamSiff]

These numbers look scary — yes, they are absolutely terrifying. 😱

But they are TOTAL FAKE FACTS sold as reality.
As per the same NCRB data, out of these 878 dowry cases in Bengaluru, the conviction rate is a pathetic 1%.

The rest? Just fake registrations and false complaints.
Imagine how many false accusers are freely roaming the city, destroying innocent families and lives.

It could be the woman sitting right next to you at work — playing the victim, claiming domestic violence, but actually a professional fake accuser.

Wake up, India.

[SIFF - Save Indian Family Foundation @realsiff]

Being a father is a serious crime in India, because judges often allow poisining of minds of children by wives, while calling it child's best interest.

Many children lost their lives due to this.

[The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨‍⚖️ @SamSiff]

They roast men for dowry demands and laugh at grooms getting toy cars instead of real ones.

But when divorce hits?

“Alimony men” cake celebration.
Zero dowry.
Zero alimony.
Zero lifetime maintenance.

Marriage shouldn’t be a one-way financial trap.
Equality means equal rules — not “men pay both ways.”

[𝑩𝒆𝒓𝒍𝒊𝒏 1.0 @BerlinFamilyman]

Indian legal framework is seen as one-sided. Bring in gender-neutral laws, legalise prenuptial agreements, and reduce the financial incentives driving litigation, &family court disputes would fall dramatically, leaving much of the litigation ecosystem with far less to fight over.

[The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨‍⚖️ @SamSiff]

One-third strength of the top court of India is busy spending days debating whether women should be allowed inside a particular temple or not.

This is the same country where crores of cases are pending for years.
People die waiting for justice.

Families get destroyed in endless litigation.
Undertrials spend years in jail without conviction.

But our top courts, sitting in AC courtrooms with senior advocates charging lakhs, are busy discussing “gender equality” in matters that should actually be decided by legislators and society.

Imagine the amount of taxpayer money, judicial time, government resources, and legal manpower being burned on debates that change nothing for the common citizen standing outside district courts waiting for basic justice.

A common man cannot even get a hearing date on time, but constitutional benches can sit for days on symbolic topics just to create headlines and intellectual entertainment.

This is India.
Justice delayed for real issues.
Luxury debates for elite satisfaction.

[SIFF - Save Indian Family Foundation @realsiff]

How many times has the Supreme Court penalized any mother for alienating and poisoning a child against the father?

It will never do it because, Supreme Court judges firmly believe that mother's best interest and nefarious agenda are more important than a child's best interest.

[SIFF - Save Indian Family Foundation @realsiff]

Many Supreme Court judges are indulging in severe contempt of Indian Constitution. They are often twisting contexts of articles.

They have made matrimonial disputes highly adversarial. If a working wife refuses to take alimony, judge is more likely to chastise her than praise her for ending things quickly.

By burdening young husbands with huge monthly or one time alimonies, Supreme Court has made mediation and settlements for amicable divorces extremely difficult.

Supreme Court judges are openly putting ghee on the fire.

Expose such unconstitutional fascist behavior of judges of Supreme Court. Go to streets with placards and distribute pamphlets. You know, what to write.

[The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨‍⚖️ @SamSiff]

No virtual hearings in matrimonial cases.???
“Come in person only — Zoom lacks ‘emotional depth’.”

Supreme Court pushes video conferencing to reduce harassment, but this judge wants litigants to book tickets, travel, and bow in court.

Why? Power trip.

Harass parties, ignore guidelines, enjoy the ego boost.
2026 and still stuck in the 90s.

Litigants’ lives don’t matter — courtroom drama does.

[The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨‍⚖️ @SamSiff]

CJI Surya Kant to a man harassed for 7-8 years in marriage:

“Constitution allows special provisions for women.”

Legal harassment of men is perfectly fine.

Maintenance demands, false cases, no cohabitation trick, lifetime alimony — all weapons given ONLY to wives.

Husbands just keep suffering.
Equal sympathy? Fake.

This is open harassment approved by the Supreme Court.

Gender apartheid in broad daylight.

Men are not ATM machines or punching bags.

[𝑩𝒆𝒓𝒍𝒊𝒏 1.0 @BerlinFamilyman]

@LiveLawIndia @1Simranbakshi Constitutional courts deciding bail cases… ok 🤡

[The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨‍⚖️ @SamSiff]

Just look at the lines of the CJI..

He openly abuse men of our country.

And we expect justice from top court??

[SIFF - Save Indian Family Foundation @realsiff]

CJI Surya Kant says: What is Your problem, how is bothering you. Self-proclaimed leader of male...

(Look at the language. Look at the insensitivity towards men suffering from parental alienation, depression, career loss and even male suicides.)

Men need a revolution on streets.