FOOTSIE

teacher and writer of graphic novels

[Tom Sherrington @teacherhead]

NEW: Powerful habit changes for more inclusive teaching. https://t.co/lMCyo5WMk9 via @teacherhead

[FOOTSIE @Phoenixarc]

@montie @LeeAndersonMP_ This can be chalked up as a result- winning

[Mr Jones @mrJ_JonesPE]

So useful for new classes in September 👏

[FOOTSIE @Phoenixarc]

@daisychristo Agree totally
With all of this

[Tom Sherrington @teacherhead]

Agreed principles; common routines: These are the ladders to better teaching. https://t.co/MKhBNiwUXz via @teacherhead

[The Principal’s Office @educator4ever36]

I love this. If I was back in the classroom I’d start the year with an activity centered around this. I actually think you can adjust it for grades 3-12. I can think of some fun activities that could go along with learning this information.

[Adam Boxer @adamboxer1]

To @andyburnham and @LucyMPowell,

There are lots of problems and things to worry about with the introduction of a new technical route at age 14.

As mentioned in the article (and flagged by union bosses) there are substantial workload and resourcing implications. Schools don't have lots of slack, and we will be teaching our current curriculums full time as soon as September hits. When will we plan and resource a whole bunch of new technical pathways? Which workforce will teach them, and with what physical infrastructure? How will schools figure out which ones to deliver? How will they be examined?

Announcing this in the holidays is traditionally considered a poor move. The Tories were big for it, Labour have consistently done it in the first week back to school to match The Grid, and broadly it is anxiety inducing and not very fun for anybody.

I have more substantive issues though:

Focusing on your local area's job market somewhat renders the entire project of social mobility dead. The point of schools and education is to take students beyond their horizons, not constrain them within it. Yes, we want students to gain employable skills, and yes, from a purely utilitarian perspective it makes sense for those skills to be local ones, but we cannot lose track of the fact we want students to be *universally* employable, and to communicate to them that the world is their oyster and they can do anything they want.

Channeling students into vocational routes at age 14 is - in my opinion - far too young. As much as you say you want parity between the two routes, you won't have it. There is literally an entry in Urban Dictionary for the term "BTEC" to mean a crappy knock-off. The current GCSE regime we have is the best we have ever hand in terms of its rigour, robustness and richness and all students should have the right to access it and carry its credentials with them for life.

In the past when we have done stuff like this, it is always "other people's children" who end up doing the technical routes. High performing and middle class schools will magically end up with fewer children in technical routes, and poor performing schools will shovel their toughest students (who are statistically from lower socio-economic backgrounds) into them. This is what happened last time, and it will happen again. It will not help social mobility, and it will ironically decrease employability. Yes, this child might be more likely to be employable as a bricklayer (which, to be clear, is fine), but they will be less employable as a data manager, software engineer, accountant, events planner or retail manager (which, to be clear, is not fine).

It's definitely the case that there is a small % of students in a small % of areas that might need different approaches to what we currently have. But it is a logical fallacy to take that small % and extrapolate it to a nation-wide policy change.

I would strongly urge you to look at the reams of research that have already been conducted in the area, and established that - potentially alone in the west - our education system is doing pretty damn well. We have a flawed but strong curriculum, improving behaviour and standards across the board and a workforce that is ever more engaged with the research base. After decades of two- and three- tier systems, we have state schools that are now proving that disadvantaged students can leave school with astonishingly high academic qualifications.

Let's not row that back.

(PS there are plenty of people with rich experience and expertise in this area [who aren't me]. These people are deeply invested in getting the best life outcomes for our students, they aren't fusty old Govian academic snobs. I am always happy to try and help you find them.)

https://t.co/23yk1IE7Y0

[FOOTSIE @Phoenixarc]

@ShippersUnbound @CharlesCumming That’s harsh

[Jamie Clark @XpatEducator]

📣 COGNITIVE ENGAGEMENT! For new knowledge to be encoded in long-term memory, we must DRIVE THINKING and ensure that students are cognitively engaged. This one-page guide summarises how you can push ALL students to think hard.

👊 REPOST and get a FREE high-quality copy: https://t.co/Xj2XpPGvnu

[FOOTSIE @Phoenixarc]

I wonder as Andy Burnham sits at home pondering becoming the PM tomorrow he might just think the way it has transpired for him feels a bit grubby?

[Shaun Allison @shaun_allison]

What do we mean by ‘adaptive teaching’ and how does the @EducEndowFoundn ‘Inclusive Teaching Guidance’ support this?

https://t.co/koQ2am4l3G

[FOOTSIE @Phoenixarc]

@bphillipsonMP While the targeted areas (secondary, special, and colleges) are meeting the pledge definitions, the total school workforce actually shrank by 1,900 teachers (0.4%). This drop was heavily driven by a decline of 2,900 teachers in primary schools

[FOOTSIE @Phoenixarc]

@MartinSLewis sorry to bother you but can you advise on the best way to invest in government gilts - Individual Gilts (e.g., T26A, TN28) as I want to start but very much a novice trader.

[David Didau @DavidDidau]

We’re often fooled by what looks like effective teaching - charisma, energy, confidence - but engagement isn’t learning. Great teaching requires both subject expertise and the ability to make complex ideas clear to novices.
https://t.co/CXZ8y3yAOK

[David Didau @DavidDidau]

We know teachers vary in quality but teacher effectiveness isn’t an unvarying trait that can be plugged into to another school changed.
Great teaching needs schools that are able to nurture it. Importing expertise may create a possibility but it isn’t a sustainable improvement strategy.
NEW: The myth of the portable teacher https://t.co/EfPcoJEFyb

[Tes magazine @tes]

The government’s focus on inclusion and oracy means that support for speech and language challenges will be a key focus for schools – and this free database on evidence-informed interventions can help, writes Megan Dixon
https://t.co/SjVRsasUZZ

[Mr G @DeputyGrocott]

I’ve put a load of my most popular files together in a Dropbox folder. Let me know if you’d like the link. Can I also ask that you share this post pretty please 🙏 (as it seems the only way to get anything seen nowadays!). 😊

[FOOTSIE @Phoenixarc]

@DeputyGrocott I would so appreciate a link to these - many thanks and keep the good work up

[Andrew Neil @afneil]

From the always insightful Stephen Daisley, this tells you more about the sad state of the country than a thousand pieces of Westminster analysis. Scotland is already a lost cause. But the rest of the country is heading in the same direction.
https://t.co/sdAUUlh87C