@Lani4x@passportpie These projects consume most of my time tbh, given my team is smaller, agile, and the projects have tighter timeframes. Power is a great field and I see no slowdown in demand whether it is traditional power delivery for utilities, data centers, EV's etc.
If the IRS wants our taxes, they should go audit the federal government and pay themselves because I’m sick and tired of working my ass off so these crooks can steal my money!
I received my designation from the Bureau of Prisons this morning
I will report to FPC Morgantown in West Virginia on December 19th
Thank you for all the noise you're making. Please continue sharing our story to get the attention of @realDonaldTrump so he may right this wrong
#pardonsamourai
so many bought into the "sell my bitcoin because of the cycle", that I think we move higher from here, once the buy back ensue - realizing there wasnt a 4-year cycle.
@hillery_dan I told you a while ago. I just think they got too "cute" without much real upside and no real custody of bitcoin assets to actual shareholders, nor auditabiity. Ive seen this before - See B1 w/ EOS. This is just a repeat of this whole rug under a corp structure.
@Gladiator21M I mean - when the common is somehow tied to the BTC. Right now, its not so why would I buy it vs. just holding the asset ? Makes no sense.
🚨 BREAKING: The FBI has just released photos of the Person of Interest in the kiIIing of Charlie Kirk
SPREAD THIS FAR AND WIDE!
Anyone who has tips should call 1-800-CALL-FBI
@Phoenixog123 @TheMatrixDr @Z06Z07@tnorth I think a lot of people are asking themselves the same question”why get cute” question right now.
Some are likely settling on the fact that Bitcoin returns are sufficient without as many unknowns. I think it makes sense with the disconnect in BTC/MSTR price we’re seeing.
I don't think there is any doubt about their logic. Question is why is mstr better than a lever play of Ibit or other alternatives given risk vs reward ?
Why get "cute" buying mstr with changing of rules when you can simply just hold the best asset outright in your own custody with no misunderstanding of actual claim to the underlying Bitcoin held by a company w unlimited dilution potential of the common?
Do not mix viability of the preferred offerings vs the common.
What I've learned in my life is that "shit happens"/"problems happen", particularly with higher levels of system complexity ("getting cute")- no matter how much "modeling" or "AI querying" is done.
No one will buy the preferred in a heavy decline. The "never sell bitcoin" doesn't seem to pass the logical sniff test. Ultimately, the company will end up selling bitcoin at some point, so this starts to shift what the company will and will not do w/ their bitcoin over the long term, violating the rule "never sell bitcoin".
I have to ask the question - Is this an intentional way for the US Gov to take this under a bailout ? Also - what is the deal with not showing the custody ?