THE NORMIE CONVERGENCE THEORY: By now, many of you are familiar with this greentext about how the internet has allowed people to become weirder, but I contend that the opposite is also true— that the internet has smoothed over the possibility of uniqueness in the normie. 1/11
Labubu!
You’ve probably heard of “Labubus”, the new toy craze, but what you probably haven’t heard of is that they started in the Consensual-Non-Consensual community as a tag.
Anyone using a Labubu on their keychain, purse, or luggage, means that they’re DOWN to CNC!
Have fun!
In the ancient world, infant mortality was so high that you just could not afford to be a moralfag about it. It is a shame, makes you sad, but was a part of life. Clearly this is biologically baked into us at some level, because most people just aren’t that perturbed by abortion.
This is obviously at least partly why abortion restrictions lose. I have from a very early age felt that abortion is morally questionable, and I am in favor of restrictions, but most people do not intuit that it is a great evil beyond anything else imaginable. You might wish they would, but they don’t. And because they don’t, we get language like this that tries to will it into existence.
Oh, you have receipts of Christians routinely being wrong, detrimental, & backwards on [insert] real world issue(s)? Well those weren’t “real Christians”! They were nominal Christians, or CINOs, or “people who call themselves…” etc. Real Christianity™️ is what lives in my head!
Christians have an infinite ability to evacuate the actual practical existence and consequences of their real-world religion. You can never really argue with them because there is always a realer, more truer Platonic version in their head which transcends your argument.
The best scholarly explanation for the "Moloch" sacrifice, which pro-lifers ceaselessly compare abortion to, is that it sprung from the perennial rituals pertaining to "first fruits". In virtually every pagan society, the first early/green harvests were given to the gods, so that the later full harvest would be more bountiful. Scholars argue that the Semitic practice of child sacrifice came from this, that with the first given to the gods, their families would be larger, healthier—a more bountiful fruit. In a world where at least half of children die, this is much easier to understand.
But the inverse, shown here by Evangelicals, is somehow more evil and impossible to understand. Their proposal is to spend every hour tending to the diseased edge of the field, as per priestly instruction, it is only the ill-fit which is worthy of attention. This idle performance is the root of all of their meaning and moralized-ecstasy
You would seriously tell me this is "pro-family"? At least the Carthaginians burned 1 child for the sake of 10. Evangelicals burn 10 for the sake of 1
“Men, you need to do most of the work in your marriage for your wife to muster up the energy to fuck you. Problem? Here’s some subjective unfalsifiable word salad about my marriage”
"Wait a second. You’re telling me your wife accepts you as her leader, accepts it’s incumbent on her to make sure you have regular and frequent sex, BUT you also communicate with her, make an effort to stay attractive to her, and make sure she enjoys the sex as well? Wow. What a PUSSY SLAVE."
Do what Jesus calls you, guys. If you have a “virtuous” wife and “lead” her by doing most of the work, you can be fortunate enough to have her put some effort in to giving you a crumb of pussy. It’s just like grace!
In marriage, responsibility works sort of like grace in Catholic theology: the husband leads, initiates, does most of the work, but the wife has to consciously choose to participate, otherwise the husband’s efforts are like sowing seed onto rocky soil.
"If I don't want to do what you told me to do that means you didn't lead correctly"
"So what do you actually do?"
"I just do what I want at all times - I deeply feel a holy call to help my husband in his quest for servant leadership"
"Well, how lovely that it worked out for you"
Aren’t you supposedly “Christian”? Why are you attempting to neg someone based on a projection of whether or not they’ve had premarital sex, a serious sin in the Christian faith?
Not only does wifeguys’ rationality crumble before the altar of women, but also any adherence to their own purported religious beliefs.
@hemingquay@HeavyNutrino@pegobry_en It’s astounding how all of you people are complete pussy slaves. You do any actual analysis of the conditions of the modern marital “contract,” and every wifeguy Christcuck immediately defaults to pure deference to women. It is pathetic.