Phronetic

[Phronetic @Phronetic_]

@jamm3rd @SHIRO_116 No, AI represents dishonest competition, lack of passion, fraud, cheating, willingness to try to benefit off of the backs of others, etc. There is no getting around that. To be in favor of AI or support it shows that u really don't care about your own work or the work of others

[Phronetic @Phronetic_]

@Marley_Q @jamm3rd @SHIRO_116 "Indpndnt thinker and defender of diversity of thoughts and opinions" in your bio lol keep deluding urself. All arguments for AI in creative industries are mostly bs. ppl in favor are inclined toward dishonest competition, fraud, cheating, and benefitting off the backs of others

[Phronetic @Phronetic_]

@noveliciouss Hiding your posts due to AI images. No creator who actually cares about their own work and creativity in general would support AI generated content

[Phronetic @Phronetic_]

@Jbotsx @All_Might93 @pbzero_official It seems like you are thinking like a human that has no true vision, skill, or intention. Like "let the robotic exoskeleton move, control the ball, and shoot all the 3 pointers so I can focus on getting praised for being a good basketball player"

[Phronetic @Phronetic_]

@Jbotsx @ProtoRoboto0939 @DullahanAmai @pbzero_official Explain exactly what tasks you are referring to when you say tedious tasks. Give some examples. Do any of them involve getting ideas, like generating concept art for ideation, generating ideas for game mechanics, or generation of content in any way?

[Phronetic @Phronetic_]

@Jbotsx @ocabecadebigorn @pbzero_official Any generative-AI will be and shld be cnsidered slop. Gen-AI is not "just a tool." AI that isn't generative could be a tool, and the term slop wldn't apply bc it's not producing content. If any content is produced/generated by AI, it is slop

[Phronetic @Phronetic_]

@Jbotsx @wrangler_warner @youngdawk92 @pbzero_official To be okay with AI eventually taking over art is to be anti-human

[Phronetic @Phronetic_]

@Jbotsx @wrangler_warner @youngdawk92 @pbzero_official No, u are making an assumption bc u want to believe ppl don't undrstnd AI so u can justify having lower standards to urself. U even said "right now" meaning ull be fine with AI being used once its better than human-made. But a lot of ppl believe art shld alwys remain human-made

[Ed Newton-Rex @ednewtonrex]

“AI l cannot coexist with education - it can only degrade it.”

Incredibly powerful piece from students at the University of Pennsylvania.

https://t.co/eTRB5WnF8M

[Phronetic @Phronetic_]

@AnonWolfoRagnar @Pirat_Nation U jst think that bc you want to try to take credit for work you didnt do. If you had a friend who was a master musician come over and you gave them prompts for pieces of music to write, is that friend a 'tool' that you used? Do you deserve to benefit off of that friend's work?

[Phronetic @Phronetic_]

@_fraecker_ @Pirat_Nation Not just a tool. If you had a friend who was a master musician come over and you gave them prompts for pieces of music to write, is your friend a 'tool' that you used? Do u deserve to benefit off of their work? Also the code editor analogy is false for so many reasons

[Phronetic @Phronetic_]

@BaronRawlinson @Pirat_Nation No, it's not just a tool. If you had a friend who was a master musician come over and you gave them prompts for pieces of music to write, then you used those pieces of music, is your friend a 'tool' that you used? Do you deserve to benefit off of that friend's work?

[Phronetic @Phronetic_]

@cryonicangel @Pirat_Nation This is ridiculous. If you had a friend who was a master musician come over and you gave them prompts to write pieces of music for you, which you then used, would your friend be considered a tool you used and would you have any right using their work for your own gain?

[John "F" Fountain @FountainCartoon]

Since #AI bros are all showing off things they’ve “made”…

I made this.

Twenty five years ago, I drew this animation by hand, with pencil, on paper, frame by frame on fours (AI “filmmakers” will have to look up what that means) by slugging the timing (again, look it up) below the drawings, at which point it was handed off to human beings who rotoscoped my animatic (keep researching, guys) with both CGI and traditional/digital tools to make it match exactly what I’d drawn.

It took a long time and a lot of work.

But I can say “We made this” and there’s no debate to be had.

See how that works?

#FairlyOddParents

#NoToGenerativeAI

[Boze Herrington, Library Owl 😴🧙‍♀️ @SketchesbyBoze]

Young people may not know this but there was a time when the internet had thousands of quirky, informative websites, when you could spend hours browsing and come away smarter rather than dumber. We have seen a wonderful thing destroyed in our lifetimes.

[Moon Priestess Aurora 🌕🏳️‍⚧️ @MoonPaladin]

Liar

[Reid Southen @Rahll]

Now that I've seen the full quote, it boils down to, "We're not going to use AI, unless we do, and if we do, it won't be for concept art, and if it is for concept art, it'll be trained on data we own or we'll be super sure about the origin." Wishy washy and basically meaningless.

[Redd/Amber 🏳️‍⚧️🦊 @LUMAMODER]

DON'T BE FOOLED they're still trying to use GenAI

[Dave Rapoza @DaveRapoza]

I really hope AI can play my AI games for me soon so I can get back to watching AI make art and create music so I have free time to work the mines for more precious ram and ssd crystals to make the machines happy

[Reid Southen @Rahll]

"AI doesn't memorize training data!"

Claude 3.7 Sonnet can reproduce 95.8% of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone.

That's 73,712 words out of 76,944.

These are plagiarism machines that exploit others people's work for profit, plain and simple.