🔥OCU–IPC V10
Complete Architecture of the #Quantum to Classical Transition
Derived Landau Core, Born Rule as Corollary, & the Demonstrated Ceiling of the Question.
Only the tests remain to be done.
➡️Download full paper :
@GoogleQuantumAI@QuantinuumQC
https://t.co/GdJWE6ibms
@BrunoTertrais La bande annonce donne surtout envie de ne pas aller le voir. C'est mal joué, pas crédible pour un sous. C'est juste un film de propagande qui sort comme par hasard quelque mois avant les élections.... Lol. C'est pathétique.
@fhollande a fait de la grosse merde avec notre argent.
➡️ 100 milliards. Rien que ça !
Mais il n'a pas à rendre de compte aux sans dents.
Qu'on se le dise...
Les bouleversements du monde mettent nos démocraties à l’épreuve. Tout change. Rien ne sera plus comme avant, mais tout est encore possible à condition de nous unir sur l’essentiel.
La France a les capacités de relever les défis qui l’attendent. Les dettes climatiques et financières ne peuvent être laissées aux générations suivantes.
La jeunesse est le projet de la Nation. Ce doit être celui de la gauche. À elle de tracer un chemin pour transformer le pays et protéger les citoyens.
Car ce que nous choisirons en 2027 déterminera le visage de la France de demain, le sort de l’Europe et l’équilibre de la planète.
C’est le projet que je défends dans « Unir. Nouveau monde, nouvelle gauche ».
📕 En librairie le 3 septembre, aux éditions @robert_laffont
@skdh In my research, I propose a test that can be run in one day by @IBMResearch or @QuantinuumQC and could show for the first time whether nature "chooses" a result differently depending on the size of each possibility — or confirm standard quantum mechanics on ground never checked.
@QuantinuumQC Early fault-tolerant machines can answer a century-old question. QEC postselection provably absorbs event-level anomalies — 2 observables survive vs branch-amplitude imbalance of logical GHZ. Standard QM: exactly flat. Never measured. ~1 day of machine time.🧵⬇️
@QuantinuumQC The null prediction: s_Γ = d(−d ln C/dt)/dw = 0, s_A = dA/dw = 0, with w = |α|²−|β|². Nonzero = first measured deviation from standard quantum dynamics. Full protocol + paper (EN/FR):
https://t.co/aXZ1ZntDxf
@QuantinuumQC Early fault-tolerant machines can answer a century-old question. QEC postselection provably absorbs event-level anomalies — 2 observables survive vs branch-amplitude imbalance of logical GHZ. Standard QM: exactly flat. Never measured. ~1 day of machine time.🧵⬇️
@GoogleQuantumAI The null prediction: s_Γ = d(−d ln C/dt)/dw = 0, s_A = dA/dw = 0, with w = |α|²−|β|². Nonzero = first measured deviation from standard quantum dynamics. Full protocol + paper (EN/FR):
https://t.co/aXZ1ZntDxf
@GoogleQuantumAI TEST READY ⬇️
Early fault-tolerant machines can answer a century-old question. QEC postselection provably absorbs event-level anomalies — 2 observables survive vs branch-amplitude imbalance of logical GHZ. Standard QM: exactly flat. Never measured. ~1 day of machine time.🧵⬇️
@jenseisert One layer stays outside this trust: postselection provably absorbs any event-level anomaly, so validated fidelities are blind to measurement dynamics.
Two observables survive the filter.
One day of machine time would scan them. Nobody has. On any platform. But... ⬇️
The test in plain terms: prepare the same giant "cat" (around a hundred qubits) by balancing the "alive" and "dead" states, and verify whether standard physics holds up precisely. Any deviation would be a historic first. Full paper (FR + EN):
https://t.co/aXZ1ZntDxf
We might soon know why #Schrödinger's cat ends up dead. Or alive...
The question was deemed untestable for a century — quantum computers just changed that. The protocol now exists in print; the experiment itself has never been done. Anywhere. One day of machine time.
@jenseisert ... the test is two null slopes:
s_Γ = d(−d ln C/dt)/dw = 0, s_A = dA/dw = 0, with w = |α|²−|β|² the branch-amplitude imbalance. Nonzero at N~100 qubits = first deviation from standard quantum dynamics.
Protocol + paper⬇️
https://t.co/aXZ1ZntDxf
@jenseisert One layer stays outside this trust: postselection provably absorbs any event-level anomaly, so validated fidelities are blind to measurement dynamics.
Two observables survive the filter.
One day of machine time would scan them. Nobody has. On any platform. But... ⬇️
@skdh This is new. A closed-form Kramers action reproduces an independent 100-digit measurement to 0.01% — data not collected for us. OCU–IPC V10: derived Landau core, Born rule as corollary, one postulate of thermodynamic type. Falsifier: C104 on logical GHZ.⬇️🧵