@tgdesrosier You're not wrong: not just Naval assets, either. 36 years of neglect and incompetence, starting with "Options For Change* in 1990 have, all too often, seen our military sent to war with the wrong stuff (ie snatch landrovers) or not enough of the right stuff.
And here we are now.
@campbellclaret The May locals surely showed overall dissatisfaction with LAB's performance during its time in government? The by election, by contrast, shows how deeply Starmer himself is disliked, as it paves the way for leadership challenge. Locals were political, by election is personal, no?
@TomSoede He is astute and politically savvy, comfortable swimming in the cesspool of contemporary politics. Personally, I see him as a catalyst rather than a politician: I certainly do not see him as fit to be PM. But that's who we're getting if the other parties don't raise their game.
@PreetKGillMP You may choose to believe him, but that does not alter his being a pathological liar, as his record both before and during his time government proves. As long as Labour MPs continue to accept his word at face value, the credibility of every single one of you remains in question.
@DesmondSwayne Yet, that was the deal: pay your NICs, get a state pension. Had those of you in the Westminster bubble had been less profligate, less irresponsible with all this dosh we gave you to look after our futures, funding it now would not be a problem.
More politcians' broken promises.
@campbellclaret 36 years since Options For Change and EVERY SINGLE GOVERNMENT SINCE HAS FAILED THE MILITARY.
Monstrous negligence, inexcusable incompetence.
@David__Osland USMC deployment in the ETO was limited. Britain was the jumping off point for the AEF's liberation of Northern Europe; would the Red Army juggernaut have halted on the Elbe had the US Army not been there? Continental Europe would likely have been speaking Russian for 80 years.
@johnredwood You undermine your own credibility with every post you make. A Tory govt, with Osborne as Chancellor and Cameron as PM, cut the defence budget by Β£80bn, increasing a decline caused by Options for Change, another Tory review in 1990. The British Military didn't vanish overnight.
@AdamKinzinger And the real shame of it is that, although we know this is all down to Trump and not Uncle Sam, the faith has been so damaged in such a short time, the mutual trust so torn, that even if the US and Europe started a major charm offensives tomorrow, recovery would take decades.
@Muinchille@thinkdefence Uncle Sam provided over 100 AIM-9L Sidewinder missiles, satellite intelligence, 12.5 million gallons of fuel at Ascension Island, and an offer of a US aircraft carrier (USS Iwo Jima). The US also joined the EEC in imposing economic sanctions on Argentina for the duration.
@haynesdeborah@FennellJW US bases in Europe facilitate the projection of US power into Europe and the Middle East: membership of NATO is why those bases exist... If this is anything more than simple rhetoric, US influence in 2 important regions becomes less than a given.