pero

[DOODLEDIVER Wanderer. @WandererWayne]

history is a flat circle

[Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️🇷🇺 @cirnosad]

Isn't it obvious?

The Judeosatanic demons created feminism, a word that destroyed the most ancient bond our species has. The man-woman bond. They aimed at it squarely to render us extinct.

Until you remove them as a whole, and all they infected, love will remain dead forever.

[Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️🇷🇺 @cirnosad]

>older guys with experience

Your experience makes your advice so much worse than no advice. Why don't you try shutting up and listening to young people and their unique conditions?

The world isn't frozen in your punk rock era, and the average modern woman is utterly horrible.

[pero @PilkiSB]

@cirnosad @H4nsSprungfeld Where can I find your physics paper?

[Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️🇷🇺 @cirnosad]

The ☢️ Missile Strike at the Pentagon on 9/11 /🧵

What really struck the WTC on 9/11? We've already eliminated airplanes as an option, which is a shock to anyone who lived through that day. We now have video evidence of not inserted planes in all footage of 9/11, but also the removal of another object. What the hell was that that "ball" like object?

Could it also be a composite? A deeper fake, so to speak? Is there any clue that could possible eliminate all other options? It's a ridiculous thought but, given what we experienced, we shouldn't make any assumptions and only work with what is real, provable and observable.

The real challenge of answering such a question is that the two world trade centres turned to dust, destroying the scene of the crime and most of the evidence with it. But we aren't out of luck, as another building was struck on 9/11:

The Pentagon.

Though there was obviously no wreckage of an aircraft on the scene, there is enough evidence in the Pentagon for us to determine not only what couldn't have struck it, but the only object in the world that could have struck it and left the damage that it did.

Unlike the strikes on the WTC, there was no televised composite film of a plane striking the pentagon, simply because the scenario required was physically impossible. The plane supposedly banked to achieve cruise speed at ground level and struck the Pentagon parallel to the ground. There is a very slow and low quality surveillance video that depicts this strike (which we will examine shortly). Yet, just from the satellite photos of the Pentagon, we can determine the actual damage.

So, let's examine three pieces of evidence based on things that are already established and known! With these pieces of evidence we will determine what struck the Pentagon and how it's related to whatever struck the WTCs and the larger plot around 9/11!

A. Penetration Depth
================
Let's do some math based on established observations. This is going to be necessary to other objects out, though it will be overkill for a plane.

The object that struck the Pentagon struck three of its five rings:
The E-Ring, the D-Ring and finally C-Ring when it stopped. The exterior wall of the pentagon consisted of ~13 centimetres of limestone and ~20 cm of bricks. Inside the Pentagon, each wall consisted of 25 cm of brick. The distance travelled to the end of ring C is 64 meters total. Given the 6 walls penetrated, at the perpendicular, that is a total of:

* 64 meters travelled after impact.
* 130mm of limestone
* 1580mm of bricks
* Six impact impulses

Even though the individual walls are not very thick or strong, that's a huge amount of material to eat through and that's at 90 degrees. And a very long distance from the first site of impact. If you measure the two visible impact zones, you will see that the object struck the Pentagon at an angle of 70 degrees to the plane. That means we have to divide the above by sin 70deg:

- 68 meters travelled
- 138mm of limestone
- 1680mm of bricks

The object was clearly on its way to the courtyard centre of the Pentagon and whoever planned this trajectory was attempting to penetrate the building as deeply as possible without targeting anything specific within it. Incidentally, the courtyard centre of the Pentagon was (and still is) called ground zero, a name it earnt during the Cold War under the assumption that the USSR would strike exactly that location during mutually assured destruction. There is even a hotdog stand in the middle of the Pentagon affectionately called cafe ground zero for this reason.

B. Pattern of Destruction
================
Despite being struck with this object, the Pentagon outer wall did not immediately collapse. In fact, close ups show very localised destructions, albeit very strong fires. 20 minutes later, the outer wall of the Pentagon collapsed.

Another important observation was impact shape it left: it was that of a single hole that destroyed a brick pattern around ~2 meters wide. This was evidence even in the C-ring. Keep this important observation in mind.

C. The Timeline
================
Let's place the attack on the Pentagon with all the events surrounding it:

8:46:30 AM - WTC North Tower is struck.
9:03:00 AM - WTC South Tower is struck.
9:37:46 AM - Pentagon is struck.
9:55:?? AM - First responders told to evacuate Pentagon perimeter.
9:57:?? AM - Pentagon outer wall "collapses".
9:58:59 AM - South Tower pulverised.
10:03:11 AM - Object destroyed over Pennsylvania.
10:28:22 AM - North Tower pulverised.

================
This is actually all the evidence we need from the Pentagon itself so let's dive deeper into the implications that every detail left behind.

/1

[✒️ @Literariium]

Confessions to the moon

[Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️🇷🇺 @cirnosad]

During your life the highest personal cost you can impose on yourself is to sin, lie or go against what is in your heart. Or, harden your heart in any way, which is such a tragedy, especially when it cannot be avoided.

[2eviltwerp @2eviltwerp]

Some of my organs are failing

[Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️🇷🇺 @cirnosad]

Almost there, let me fix it for you.