pimabtc

new profile @pimaBD

[Piyush @PimaBD]

Recently @a16zcrypto published article about "The missing infrastructure for AI agents: 5 ways blockchains can help" where great contributor were there including @cc_crowley, @ccatalini, @ahall_research, @liz_harkavy, @nlevine19, and @psneville.

And Guess What : we had build this, now looking to make it live soon -

@MOI_Tech - The Participant Layer of Internet, which can solve this and beyond while catering enterprises, web2 apps and web3 dapps.

Authority lives independently at the participant level. so you don’t embed it into every agent, you keep it separate, and you propagate it only when you deliberately choose to. This creates clean, controllable, and revocable control without baking permissions into every AI instance.

Our Moat: Participant-Level State Management
We own the participant layer.
- The source of truth for “who can do what” sits with the participant, not the agent.
- When the participant’s state is set to “participant,” every downstream decision (even by agents) must resolve against that single source.
- Agents themselves remain completely stateless, they carry no persistent authority.

Why This Matters (The Permission Problem Solved) If every agent simply “holds an API key,” you have a nightmare:
- How do you give or revoke permission dynamically?
- How do you enforce it across thousands of interactions without constant re-authorization?

Our model flips it:
- Agents need authority, they don’t own it.
-Authority lives at the interaction level, issued fresh from the participant’s state on every call.
- Revocation is instant and global: change the participant state once → agents lose access immediately. No chasing down API keys.

Result: True Distributed Authority
- Participant = Stateful (owns the rules)
- Agent = Stateless (executes only what it’s handed)
- Authority = Dynamically granted per interaction This gives real safety and trust to AI agents.

Target Use Cases
- Safe Pool of AI agents (secure, auditable multi-agent environments)
- AI Governance frameworks (enterprise-grade control and compliance)
- Enterprise Data Consent & KYC (solve the consent-entity problem cleanly, participants explicitly grant/revoke consent at source, KYC-compliant by design)

[pimabtc @pimabtc]

RT @PimaBD: Hi VCs,

An open call to know how you can use @MOI_Tech the participant network - https://t.co/3TzYjKX3BX

Trustclaw - Where a…

[Piyush @PimaBD]

User: AI agents neither be trusted nor it can ask for permission from Participant

@MOI_Tech :

[Piyush @PimaBD]

Confirmed: 12T of KitKat have been hacked from the market

If you want to use safe defi and safe ai agent then use @MOI_Tech

[Piyush @PimaBD]

Agree on Agents hallucinations @arlanr

That’s why we have build contextual Compute with patent on top of it and made participant layer on top of it @MOI_Tech

Would like to invite you to try out Moi and let’s see how we can help with your mission while making agents safe.

[Piyush @PimaBD]

Question - Can AI sovereign to person is created

Answer - Thats what Participant layer at @MOI_Tech is doing. You decide what you what to give access to your data.

While apps now log into you to share details

Participant is the new King.

[Piyush @PimaBD]

Context is important and context should belong to participant/user

That’s why @MOI_Tech is build with contextual compute.

[Piyush @PimaBD]

Good to see you understand this @SBF_FTX

[Piyush @PimaBD]

Hope civilians will be safe in middle east.

[Piyush @PimaBD]

Next raise of @xai by @elonmusk

[Piyush @PimaBD]

While we make Safe AI with Contextual compute at @MOI_Tech

Just for your context

Build through context only

The Participant layer for agent

[Piyush @PimaBD]

Jack was literally doing this doing Covid...

[Piyush @PimaBD]

It is an amazing ad, I would love to learn and see how I can make ad like this

[Piyush @PimaBD]

I have @patrickc, CEO of @stripe, saying that for AI we need 10,000,000 TPS blockchain.

But I believe AI needs far more than that. AI needs a block in a chain with unlimited scalability, which can only happen with a participant-centric approach. That’s why @MOI_Tech makes every token a root token with endless scalability…

End of Blockchain Trillama, which was created while we were building on top of existing tech.

Problem Solved

Welcome to the Participant layer and makes safe AI possible as complimentary service.

[Piyush @PimaBD]

I think you literally raised an important question @SBF_FTX.

We see what, where, how component already there in logic, storage and execution form.

But we don’t have who compute in tech stack for AI agents which can bring participant centric approach, have your identity, ownership will be with user themself, and agency who can work at this level.

This is structural fix to computer science itself which is done by Contexual compute and gives us who component.

On contextual compute as foundation @MOI_Tech is build which gives who component to AI Agent while making AI safe as well.

This also gives principal of record, scoped authority, interaction-level accountability, live revocation, unified assets at Participant level.

Welcome to participant layer @MOI_Tech

[Piyush @PimaBD]

this is what i have seen

[Piyush @PimaBD]

Another raise in another big AI company for making tools.

[Piyush @PimaBD]

🚨🚨🚨Announcement🚨🚨🚨
I am Joining @MOI_Tech , The Participant Layer.

It lets "Apps log into you" , making Safe DeFi , humanising AI and enabling many more use cases where trust matters.

Participant is the new King.

To learn more, check out https://t.co/Ex6X6WeG2c

[Sol Heist @playsolheist]

Bringing the spice @solana was missing.

Stay tuned

[Piyush @PimaBD]

8 years in web3 has taught me all random Julia, Mia, Emily are he/him