Rogue IDAC! Bellochun and his boss Andrea!😡 Bellochun was most active in striking the suspicious Cat Matlala plea deal and was very active in court. 👀Senior investigator despite his dodgy character? NPA and IDAC have been protecting him despite the controversy surrounding him.
First he compared this idiot Fadial Adam's arrest to that of Steve Biko, then he compared this quationable character Andrea Johnson to Winnie Mandela, & you expect sober people to take that imbecile seriously lol😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
#MadlangaComission
Winnie Mandela of the EFF forwarded the complainant’s statements to Khan so that he can prepare counter-response and intimidate victims. Can you imagine the criminality that we have in our justice system? Malema worshipped this crook as Mandela 🤐.
The dots are connecting…
Fighters must be seriously worried about their leader; he is clearly captured by a dangerous Indian cabal. How else would you explain this twerking by Malema? What is the EFF leadership saying? Or do they have no say there?
It appears that a turf war between state institutions over Vusi “Cat” Matlala is growing.
The allegations suggest a growing institutional battle over who controls the investigation and the “witness.”
The dispute between the PKTT and IDAC, sources say, appears to extend beyond Matlala himself, raising questions about competing investigative mandates, prosecutorial strategy and institutional authority.
At the heart of these allegations is not only the R360-million SAPS healthcare tender, but an apparent struggle between different law enforcement structures over who directs one of South Africa’s most significant corruption investigations.
The allegations point to what some observers would describe as a classic turf war, with competing agencies allegedly contesting custody, witness management and investigative direction.
If proven, these allegations raise profound questions about cooperation between law enforcement agencies and whether institutional rivalry is undermining the administration of justice.
Key Allegations include:
• IDAC allegedly charged Matlala on the SAPS healthcare tender without properly coordinating with the Political Killings Task Team (PKTT), despite him already being in their lawful custody.
• IDAC and PKTT fought over where Matlala should be detained -PKTT wanted him at eBongweni Correctional Centre in Kokstad under strict conditions, while IDAC pushed for Kgosi Mampuru II in Pretoria.
• Detention at Kgosi Mampuru was allegedly used as a bargaining tool -Matlala was reportedly offered more favourable detention conditions in exchange for his cooperation with IDAC.
• Matlala was allegedly promised lenient treatment and better detention conditions if he cooperated with IDAC’s investigation into the R360 million SAPS tender.
• IDAC is accused of trying to pressure Matlala to implicate additional senior figures, including senior politicians, Lieutenant General Dumisani Khumalo, National Commissioner Fannie Masemola, and Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi.
• Matlala allegedly told SAPS investigators that IDAC wanted him to broaden his statement to implicate more people in exchange for leniency.
• Matlala allegedly offered to provide information about other cops and claimed that some evidence presented to the Madlanga Commission was false or misleading.
• Matlala reportedly requested 24-hour SAPS protection for his wife, assurance of no further charges, and protection for his family in exchange for cooperating with SAPS -these requests were apparently rejected.
• Matlala’s case was separated from his co-accused, and he has remained at Kgosi Mampuru during negotiations, rather than being returned to eBongweni.
• There are claims that Matlala is not just being turned into a legitimate Section 204 witness, but is being used as a strategic instrument in a wider institutional power struggle between state bodies.
If these allegations are true, it raises serious concerns about two important law enforcement agencies being at loggerheads.
@pule_jones@DasenThathiah@eNCA
We are going to end up with offical South African documents not being with the paper on them.
Why is our government just dismissing the seriousness of this national crisis?
I voted for Gayton McKenzie (& the PA) because he seemed to be doing good, impactful work in the Karoo. He posted his work regularly - like Dr Nasiphi Moya is doing currently in Tshwane.
I had hope that he would do more community-level work with greater power in parliament. I gave him one vote & gave ActionSA one vote.
After the elections, McKenzie became imbongi (a praise singer) & a vocal defender of Cyril Ramaphosa & the ANC.
He has gone back on his promises & today even speaks ill of ordinary SAns crying out about illegal foreigners, after he jumped & screamed "abaHambe" on stage.
If I supported Ramaphosa the way he does, I could've voted for the ANC, but I didn't. The ANC is corrupt, hates SAns & Ramaphosa is the worst president the country has had.
I'm very disappointed in Gayton McKenzie. I'm very disappointed in the PA.
At the time, it seemed like a good decision to vote for Gayton based on his work & where he said he wanted to put in necessary work. He's done a 180 since joining parliament & becoming a minister.
I'm sorry for voting for the PA & giving them power. I will not vote for them again. 🙏🏽
Now... we hold our breath to see if/when ActionSA will also disappoint us... coz seemingly all politicians serve their funders & not their voters nor ordinary SAns.
South Africans are in kak. We need non-racial "Afriforums" run by ppl like Vuyo Zungula, Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma & Dr Nasiphi Moya. Inde lendlela ✊🏽
You allowed this to happen for too long. From taxi drivers deciding that e-hailing drivers, friends and relatives could not transport people, to this. Videos of non-state actors "enforcing" their jungle law on South African streets have been circulating for so long. These actors were proud of their "law enforcement" and actually recorded it. You and your government were spectators. It is a sign that you were absent or too scared to face the backlash should you act against South Africans breaking the law. It doesn't matter how valid grievances are, NO STATE should quietly watch a parallel state emerge, with non-state actors deciding who belongs snd who doesn't, who must live or die. Your government, led by you, did that.