wee seeen many new followers today
thanks for da support. u still early on t00ns cause we not l00nching s00n
as for collabs: all u've seen on the timeline is purely organic. we collected a few addys in the last months, we also messaged a few br0s that have been active
u want to be considered for collabs yhh? pr00f of contribution is da way. post about t00ns, do sumthin bout t00ns, and we put u on da list. easier for us wen the time comes. if u message us just askin for collabs, with a template copy pasted 99999 times, b0000ring
if it wasn't clear: we don't care if u a big r sm0l account, we want to see ur soul at wurk
sum people changed their pp to t00ns, funny cause our design not final. we been in this nft game since 2019, we t00k lots of inspiration from og collections, new ones, failed ones, gud success story yada yada yada
rite now, we having massive f00n. after 5 months of being active/inactive, it's heartwurming to see the support from the community
but yhhhh, we not minting s00n, be chill, be nice, be t00ns about it*
*this artwork is not contractual. the final collection may or may not include this piece. we explorin new leads, new designs, shapes, digging through art b00ks. this one was inspired by nigo and bape, iykyk
🚨Hub updates
Gallery now supports wallet connection, so holders can view their own notes
Trade button added to each note
Coming soon: Top Sales, back side of the notes, and much more
Send Notes higher and higher
https://t.co/5r7WLHw1bW
@willo2_Poly I believe in team @Polymarket they will resolve it as yes. It will be the biggest fair play in history. More people will come to polymarket
And it becomes #1 prediction market.
Waiting for this to unfold
Here's my honest opinion on the MSTR market resolution.
It will close NO.
This is because UMA is forced to respect the rules as written by Polymarket. Polymarket changed the rules, and now the outcome is literally in the rules.
Even if UMA voters think that this outcome is ridiculous... they are forced to ratify it. They must abide by the rules that Polymarket wrote.
So really... in 5 hours, we simply receive confirmation that UMA is forced to follow centralized Polymarket decisionmaking. Polymarket can change the rules, at any time, for any reason, and UMA are forced to respect it. No voting needed.
So is UMA really that independent? Does UMA hold any power whatsoever? Not really. It's puppet decentralization so that Polymarket can shift dispute blame onto a separate entity.
This market most likely closes NO in 5 hours. But that doesn't change anything.
The scam already occurred. Clearly, the way that this gets solved will not be through Polymarket's internal processes. So let's take it to the next level.
In my opinion, Polymarket made a massive mistake here by changing the rules so brazenly. They fucked up... BAD.
If you're going to rely on a system that offloads dispute blame to another entity, you shouldn't take it upon yourself to cut that entity out of the resolution process. Now, the blame falls entirely on Polymarket's shoulders. This really isn't a difficult argument to make.
Any rational individual who looks at this market can conclude that Polymarket themselves now have the responsibility of this market's resolution. Big mistake, and that's what makes this case very different from prior UMA voting disputes. You can't hide behind UMA now.
Polymarket markets are resolved according to a set of pre-defined and stated rules. Polymarket themselves modified these market rules. The clarification materially changed the conditions for a Yes outcome after trading had already occurred.
Polymarket's own documentation says clarifications "cannot change the fundamental intent of the question."
Clearly, this one did.
Polymarket, your time is running out.
This MicroStrategy market is exposing the biggest problem with Polymarket
If Strategy sold BTC on May 26, why is this still being treated like some philosophical debate?
The rule was simple: “MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026”
But now the outcome depends on UMA voting?
So basically, the final truth is not only about facts, filings, or on-chain data, but also about who has enough UMA voting power?
That is not the clean “decentralized prediction market” experience users were promised
If whales can influence resolution through token-weighted voting, then small traders are not just betting on the event
They are betting against market wording, oracle politics, and voting power
This is exactly how trust dies
@Polymarket@shayne_coplan@mustafap0ly@UMAprotocol prediction markets need clear rules, strict cut-off times, and neutral resolution
Not “who can vote harder”
🚨 UPDATE 🚨
Official Statement on the Polymarket MicroStrategy Market
I have formally served a legal demand letter - prepared together with legal advisors and counsel - on Adventure One QSS Inc., doing business as Polymarket, the Panama-incorporated entity publicly associated with Polymarket's international platform. This matter will be pursued under applicable Panamanian law and any other relevant jurisdictions.
The written rule said "sells." It did not say "discloses."
I will keep pursuing every lawful avenue available until this market receives a fair review.
IN PROGRESS:
I have also formally filed a complaint with the CFTC regarding the disputed market, "MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026?"
The rule said "sells," not "discloses." This dispute now warrants regulatory scrutiny, proper documentation, and an impartial review. I will continue preserving evidence and exhausting every lawful path open to me.
I have now sent the Polymarket evidence brief by email to:
@CoinDesk@dlnews@CryptoSlate@FT@washingtonpost
If you care about fair markets, please like, repost, and comment so more people can see this.
If any journalist, editor, crypto researcher, legal analyst, or media friend is willing to review the evidence and write about this publicly, I would be deeply grateful.
This should not fade away quietly.
Too many users trusted the written rules. Too many people are now being ignored.
We have to keep pushing.
We have to fight this to the end.
Rule before trade.
I’m 20 years old, still a university student.
Before this dispute, I was one of the top 10 YES holders in the Polymarket MicroStrategy market. I lost around 35,000 USDC because I trusted the written rule.
The rule said YES if MicroStrategy sold Bitcoin by May 31.
It did not say the sale had to be publicly disclosed by May 31.
That is the whole issue.
If you want to help:
Repost this.
Tag a journalist.
Tag a lawyer.
Send this to a crypto researcher.
Submit your case if you were affected.
https://t.co/pmXUtr9jFD
Silence is what platforms count on.
Don’t give them that.
I still don't know who the biggest holder is, but I noticed that he has a passion for dollar banknotes. That's why this plaque will go directly to him🫶
how can you not be bullish on @banknotes_btc?
2,000 banknotes no more, no less, permanently inscribed on the motherchain
an eternal reminder of what banknotes will be like in 10–20 years
the magic of ordinals: preserving art, banknotes, and doodles while keeping them intact!
i want even more banknotes, damn it!