The education minister of India resigned upon their initiative and persistence alongwith the common public which was resorted to lathi charge and tear gas. I guess that's enough.
🚨 𝗖𝗝𝗜 𝗦𝘂𝗿𝘆𝗮 𝗞𝗮𝗻𝘁 🌞🙅♂️ 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗵 𝗛𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗵𝗮 𝗥𝗼𝗼𝗽𝗮𝗺'𝘀 𝗔𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗹. 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗚𝗼𝘁 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘆. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁 𝗜𝘀 𝗡𝗼𝘄 𝗔𝘀 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗔𝘀 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗖𝗜.
On July 13, 2026, CJI 🌞🙅♂️ issued the Supreme Court's roster notification. It was clear: habeas corpus petitions and preventive detention matters (categories 2201-2202) were to be heard by the first four benches only - led by CJI Surya Kant, Justice Vikram Nath, Justice BV Nagarathna, and Justice MM Sundresh (Live Law).
📊 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗩𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
- Medha Roopam's appeal against her NSA detention was listed before a bench of Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice N K Singh (Live Law).
- That bench did not have the roster for preventive detention matters as per the July 13 notification (Live Law).
- Category 2202 - habeas corpus and preventive detention - was conspicuously absent from Justice Sharma's roster (Times Now).
- No defects were notified in the petition. The matter was specially assigned (Live Law).
- The CJI 🌞🙅♂️ is the master of the roster. He can assign a case. But he cannot assign it to a bench outside the roster and then claim the roster was followed.
🪞 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗵 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲
- Medha Roopam's matter is connected to the Noida workers' protest case (Live Law).
- The connected Noida workers' protest matters were already being heard by Justice Nagarathna's bench (Live Law).
- Standard judicial practice: connected matters should be listed before the same bench to avoid contradictory orders (Times Now).
- Instead, CJI Surya Kant 🌞🙅♂️ specially assigned the appeal to Justice Sharma's bench (Live Law).
- Prashant Bhushan: "Shocking that the appeal against the Allahabad HC judgement quashing the preventive detention order of student activist was listed in the juniormost court of Justice SC Sharma, though the roster of such cases was only with the seniormost 4 benches! What is going on in the SC?!" (Times Now).
⚖️ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘆
- The Allahabad High Court had quashed Medha Roopam's NSA detention (Bar and Bench).
- The High Court directed ₹5 lakh compensation to be recovered from the District Magistrate's salary (Bar and Bench).
- The High Court's order was scathing: Roopam's conduct was "worthy of derision" and she was "guilty of violating her oath of allegiance" to the Constitution (Indian Express).
- On September 23, the specially assigned bench stayed paragraphs 27 to 33 of the High Court order - the strictures and the ₹5 lakh compensation (Indian Express).
- The stay was granted. The compensation was halted. The special bench delivered exactly what a special bench is assembled to deliver.
🏛️ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻
- The ECI: One man ignored two Election Commissioners who objected 14 times. The process was called "unauthorised and illegal." The objections were buried. 13 crore names were deleted.
- The SC: One man ignored his own roster, bypassed a sitting judge's bench hearing connected matters, and specially assigned a case to a bench of his choosing.
- Two constitutional bodies. Two institutions meant to check power. Two institutional heads ignoring the rules they themselves wrote.
- The ECI compromised its independence by ignoring its own Commissioners. The SC is compromising its independence by ignoring its own roster.
- The pattern is identical: when the outcome matters more than the process, the process is bent until the outcome is achieved.
The ECI was compromised. The Supreme Court is now compromised.
𝗔 𝗖𝗝𝗜 🌞🙅♂️ 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗮 𝗖𝗘𝗖 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀.
𝗕𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝘂𝗻.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗲𝘀.
✌️
#SupremeCourt #CJISuryaKant #MedhaRoopam #MasterOfRoster
@the_hindu If he has this much money to invest, why does he settle with the banks and seek waiver and not repay the TOS? While middleman is made to even bear the cost of MDR on UPI payments.
Two of the three Election Commissioners have formally objected on record, at least 14 times, to decisions taken and orders issued around the SIR according to an investigative report by @RitikaChopra__ for @IndianExpress
My comic for @thenewsminute
@DCPNewDelhi@SauravDassss The allegations are brutal, crack in skull! Not supported by facts? Define weapon? Can a Kada not indict grevious injury? Detained? and served a notice as per law? That's it?
@Saurabh_MLAgk@LtGovDelhi I say it again, the previous LG was better. Atleast he was critical of the then Delhi government. He used to read all files and was critical of any wrong happening. He even directed registration of FIRs against people who he thought did wrong. The new LG isn't effective enough.
@AamAadmiParty The most shocking fact being LIC was the majority stakeholder which gave its consent. When it comes to insurance pay-out, every company wants to find out a loophole and deny claims.
मोदी सरकार ने पेट्रोल के आयात पर खर्च होने वाले पैसे बचाने की बात की थी, लेकिन Ethanol Production में गन्ने की खपत बढ़ने से अब सरकार चीनी आयात करने पर मजबूर हो गई है।
कम से कम प्रधानमंत्री मोदी, पूर्व प्रधानमंत्री अटल बिहारी वाजपेयी जी से कुछ सीखते और फैसले सोच-समझकर लेते।
आज भारत को एक पढ़ा-लिखा और समझदार प्रधानमंत्री चाहिए।