Platinum Club

We're the Health & Physique experts! Personalized consulting to REACH YOUR BEST - IN LESS TIME & EFFORT. Live stronger, longer, and look great along the way.

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@IvisonJ Wut? Desperate for…? You understand the US economy is 13 x larger than Canada’s right? And 15% of US exports go to Canada while 70% of Canada exports go to the US…you know that right? So why in the world would you assume the US is desperate?? Ignorance or delusions?

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@ZoltanMerczel Unsettling - a child cyborg robot thing. What’s wrong with good old human children? I don’t get the obsession with robots.

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@Will_Tanner_1 Along with all the dog breeds that were actually bred to attack humans? And then after that destroy all the guns, and then the knives, and then anything else that could harm someone?

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@AlexBerenson Before you post anything else respond to this:

https://t.co/V6NYRZiFCD

Nobody is interested in a what appears to be an intentional distraction of a pissing match between you & some guy calling you a pedo

[Champagne Joshi @JoshWalkos]

I thought you may present this as your “evidence”. Did you know a reanalysis was conducted? It turns out Alex, things aren’t as simple as you like to make them.

Do you know what they discovered?

The study’s most-quoted finding that no cervical cancers occurred in women vaccinated at ages 12–13, turns out to be nearly guaranteed by design, not by vaccine efficacy.

They found that the prior probability of finding “no cancer” in this age cohort was approximately 0.5 regardless of vaccine efficacy, because Scotland’s revised screening program meant women in this cohort were under 25 at the time of data cutoff and were therefore statistically unlikely to have been diagnosed with cervical cancer even without vaccination. Cervical cancer typically takes 10–20 years to develop (as you undoubtedly know) from HPV infection, and the follow-up period for this group was far too short to meaningfully test cancer prevention.

Furthermore, Saidi and Jones identified that the study authors failed to report one actual cancer case (a sarcoma, patient ID 361758) in the 12–13 vaccinated cohort, making the “zero cases” claim factually incorrect.

They also flagged a fundamental data integrity problem: the number of participants analyzed far exceeded the actual same-age population of Scotland according to the National Registry. The study’s own data tables confirm this inflation, for example, the 1988 birth cohort shows 59,499 “eligible” in the Scottish Cervical Cancer Call Recall System (SCCRS) against only 37,934 in the National Registry, a 57% overcount . The authors acknowledged this anomaly in their internal scripts but offered no clear explanation, and the discrepancy was never resolved.

A MedCheck analysis directly examined the Scottish data and found the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of cervical cancer between completely vaccinated vs. incompletely vaccinated women was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.15–0.85), a gap far too large to be explained by vaccination alone and strongly suggestive of baseline health differences between groups.

A search of 592 HPV vaccine effectiveness cohort studies found zero studies that adjusted for the healthy vaccinee effect, making this a field-wide blind spot, not just a problem with this paper.

Also, the comparison between vaccinated and unvaccinated women is deeply flawed because the groups are not comparable. Saidi and Jones found that older women and unscreened women were significantly over-represented in the unvaccinated population, which dramatically biases the cancer incidence figures upward in the unvaccinated group.

This is an observational, retrospective registry study, there is no randomized control group, no placebo, and no blinding. The entire evidence chain rests on comparing administrative records from groups whose differences in health behavior, socioeconomic status, screening history, sexual history, and smoking status are either unmeasured or inadequately controlled. The Cochrane HPV vaccine review itself found no RCT evidence that HPV vaccination reduces invasive cervical cancer incidence. NO RCT EVIDENCE.

Finally, The study was conducted by researchers at Public Health Scotland and funded through NHS Scotland infrastructure, institutions that are themselves responsible for administering, promoting, and defending the HPV vaccination program .

The lead author Tim Palmer has previously published multiple papers promoting HPV vaccination effectiveness in Scotland, representing a clear line of ideological and institutional investment. The study discloses no external funding conflicts, but institutional conflicts, where the authors’ professional mission is the same program they are evaluating are rarely disclosed or examined.

I know you want it to be simple but that not how these things work and the “evidence” is fundamentally flawed in many ways. The headline alone is absurd on its face and should be viewed with extreme skepticism.

https://t.co/wli0q6qzGw

https://t.co/r0mf2nzmWm

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@truecanadian867 @observer2_9 @VancouverSun The problem with that is it works against the number one tool for reducing rate of people starting to use them - social stigma/shame

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@observer2_9 @truecanadian867 @VancouverSun Well for one that’s not an accurate depiction. Second, I only said it wasn’t purely malevolent. Third, I asked what should have been instead?

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@truecanadian867 @observer2_9 @VancouverSun I agree - but handing out hard drugs & going around reviving every last person ODing…often the same person multiple times a day definitely isn’t the solution & definitely is burning taxpayer’s money they work for. Why would productive people put up with that?

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@truecanadian867 @observer2_9 @VancouverSun I guarantee legalizing & giving out free hard drugs isn’t the solution to reducing their use!

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@truecanadian867 @observer2_9 @VancouverSun Wait but Res Schools are a product of early Euro & are not the source of Indig. issues. Again, what should have been done instead?

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@truecanadian867 @observer2_9 @VancouverSun It’s far more complicated & difficult than it was a failure of our society. Easy to criticize from a far. What should have been done by early Europeans?

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@truecanadian867 @observer2_9 @VancouverSun 1 - OK
2 - OK
3 - No not with my money…and ‘safe’ is a lie used to make it seem better, it’s a marketing ploy.
4 - OK
5 - OK
See we’re not that far apart on the issue.

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@truecanadian867 @observer2_9 @VancouverSun But you’re not & on top of that you’re advocating for endless suffering, funded by everyone. If there’s people out there who want to provide an endless supply of ‘safe’ drugs & narcan I won’t stop you, just don’t confiscate my money to find it, you pay out of your pockets.

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@observer2_9 @truecanadian867 @VancouverSun Ya probably in that range I’d have to think.

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@truecanadian867 @VancouverSun Sure, won’t argue with you there

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@truecanadian867 @VancouverSun You know what’s arguably the best form of educating people to not use in the first place? Social stigma…not accepting hard drug use as being OK. Handing out free hard drugs and limitlessly providing counter active narcan is not sending that message.

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@truecanadian867 @KamehamehaKush @VancouverSun OK, now multiply that by how many kits? I’m not saying don’t invest in ANY narcan…but there’s gotta be some limits.

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@truecanadian867 @observer2_9 @VancouverSun I just don’t have a suicidal, illogical, irrational blinding level of empathy.

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@truecanadian867 @observer2_9 @VancouverSun Isn’t that what the people themselves are tying to do? To stop their own suffering by getting so high on opioids that they die? You know what these people do when administered Narcan? Become extremely agitated and sometimes aggressive with the administrator for pulling them out.

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@truecanadian867 @SillyWorkMedia @VancouverSun No, spend more on healthcare for actual health. Giving out free hard drugs isn’t healthcare, it’s enabling at best…in reality it’s providing drug users something they can sell in order to buy the unclean drugs they actually fein for.

[Platinum Club @PlatinumClubHP]

@truecanadian867 @VancouverSun Ya, how many people do you think end up on the DTES, OD and then make it out to have some form of a productive life? I bet it’s a very very small fraction.