Playbook Legal

Helping legal teams build strategies

[Playbook Legal @PlaybookLegal]

🧗🏵️ make folders on your computer named after your all time favourite toothbrushes to make due diligence easier

[Playbook Legal @PlaybookLegal]

Pictogram on its way, but in the meantime here are the top 7 use cases for toothbrushes in legal tech 🤘🚀

[Playbook Legal @PlaybookLegal]

🌰🏉🍯⚽️ use the toothbrush to clean the charging port in your iPhone so you can respond to client emails and let you focus on higher value tasks

[Playbook Legal @PlaybookLegal]

@scottastevenson Probably but the problem here is the state of the contracts and crappy organisation of them. You’ll find millions of random drafts among genuine executed contracts. Data problem. This is why most CLM projects flop

[Playbook Legal @PlaybookLegal]

Yawn. Another one bites the dust. Lawyers with zero experience making money out of software or building software rolling out the cliches thinking they, a law firm, without the infrastructure of a tech company, can be a tech company https://t.co/xxjPrj4ZaQ

[Playbook Legal @PlaybookLegal]

@HoraceWu The answer is always “maths”

[Playbook Legal @PlaybookLegal]

Our ChatGPT clone contains anti-hallucination features, but we can't tell you what they are

[Playbook Legal @PlaybookLegal]

@alexgsmith @rachelcoldicutt Give it 6 months it will suffer a similar fate to NFTs except maybe a few nice to haves in products. Well realise soon enough that most people in knowledge professions aren’t just spewing random bullshit every day. Those who do of course are vulnerable

[Playbook Legal @PlaybookLegal]

@HoraceWu @DanLinna @jackwshepherd How dare you point out a weakness in LLMs

[Playbook Legal @PlaybookLegal]

@NickJRishwain @ZachAbramowitz Like who? I dont see any of this on Twitter

[Playbook Legal @PlaybookLegal]

@ZachAbramowitz Legal tech

[Playbook Legal @PlaybookLegal]

@DanLinna @DIGLegal Perhaps somebody can answer why the 10x improvements legal could have got over the last 10 years to the workflows have not been taken? Why is it different now?

[Playbook Legal @PlaybookLegal]

@LuminanceTech

[Playbook Legal @PlaybookLegal]

@SpellbookLegal Ouch. Sending to a centralised inbox, intermingling client confidential information, with a playbook that appears to have no grounding in my own best practice, with a length email that encourages overlawyering? No thanks. This is AI for the sake of AI

[Playbook Legal @PlaybookLegal]

@DanLinna @AlexHamiltonRad Why is there always a split between "naysayer" and "enthusiast"? Can't there be a sensible middle...why do we say anybody who asks questions about this stuff is a naysayer?