Hey everyone, sign up to @VOXI_UK with a referral link and get up to £40. Except they may send you £10, after 3 months not 2; and say its not their fault. SMH, thanks.
@neilmckt@StackTrillions@AFC_Ryan__ Most reports after the comments state Aresnal did say something of the sort on their Weibo account.
"As a football club, Arsenal always adheres to the principle of not being involved in politics."
@RogerHelmerMEP It has to be that way as the app doesnt hold personally identifiable information, they would have no way to fine people ignoring the advice.
2 systems trying to do the same job with different approaches.
@StephenDrew72 Scotland have their own Covid app so guess you would need that for their QR codes.
Also the app is not Serco, it is an open sourced project under NHSX. Serco only run the Track and Trace services, badly at that.
@dansga45 Only 6 out of 20 million?
The app does not rely on self diagnosis, it allows people to enter their symptoms and that is only 1 part of it as well as entering test results, checking other nearby devices etc.
Got any source for that false positive rate?
Cheers
@iGuyC@damocrat That's correct, the API doesnt measure the significance though, just tells you if you have been near someone that has it. The app works out how significant it is measuring the time spent and distance etc. The app was updated recently to try and reduce worry about the APIs warning
@PaulmichaelODo1 Why would they need an app to spy on you if you have a smartphone with you anyway?
Why would they opensource the app so people could see their "spy" code?
Makes no sense.
@tsh2@NHSCOVID19app Your guess is spot on, its actually a notification from the Google/Apple API, that is saying you were near someone, could have just been in passing.
The app runs its own algorithm using time/distance etc & if your a "hit" you will get a timer telling you how long to isolate for.
@robmclean1976 @pukka60000 @PPEMedpro@GNev2@MarcusRashford On this thread? You mentioned Serco, no-one else.
You literally said it cost £35 million and linked to a story about the app and now pretend you are fixing other peoples misquotes? Wow,
You then said they had spent less than £10bn without proof.
@robmclean1976 @pukka60000 @PPEMedpro@GNev2@MarcusRashford You mentioned Serco, who else did? You mentioned the app when the track and trace system was mentioned, you are as clear as mud and as flip floppy as summer shoes.
I told you my claim, you are being disengenuous as you cannot back up what you say.
@robmclean1976 @pukka60000 @PPEMedpro@GNev2@MarcusRashford You mentioned Serco, who else did?
" I said track and trace hadn’t cost £10bn " Yet you cant prove it and are now trying to spin it as you know you cant.
@robmclean1976 @pukka60000 @PPEMedpro@GNev2@MarcusRashford Yes, the system has £10bn, its a £10bn system. I did not, anywhere use the words spent with that statement. You did and cannot prove it.
@robmclean1976 @pukka60000 @PPEMedpro@GNev2@MarcusRashford Omg, stop repeating what I say. I already asked you tgo prove it or move on now you are spinning it again, getting silly.
@robmclean1976 @pukka60000 @PPEMedpro@GNev2@MarcusRashford In my book, whatever that is, it reads like this.
£10bn for the pogramme which includes contacting people that they are doing around 60% is a failure and i stand by that book.
@robmclean1976 @pukka60000 @PPEMedpro@GNev2@MarcusRashford That was an app, he clearly wasnt talking about that as he mentioned the low contact percentage, the app doesnt do that.
I already said the £10bn was for the whole thing, why do you keep repeating it as if it was your statement?
@robmclean1976 @pukka60000 @PPEMedpro@GNev2@MarcusRashford I've twisted nothing, you claimed £35m, relised you were on about something different.
I accept nothing, £10bn is for their whole track and trace programme.
@robmclean1976 @pukka60000 @PPEMedpro@GNev2@MarcusRashford Thats a poor point, using that awful logic then the government are saying they have spent it by announcing £10bn for their programme.
I did no say it was spent, no claim, you said it wasnt, claim with no evidence.