I am not a spike-producing body!

Honesty, Integrity, Right-wiseness, these are qualities of a good conscience. I am aiming for a high level of those traits, and admire those with them.

[I am not a spike-producing body! @PlinthFur]

Scamdemic Alert‼️ Do not fall for it! Say NO! Stand fast!

[David Robinson @CalgaryDave]

Just 4 years ago, this was a weekly or bi-weekly occurance at our household.

Now, I can't remember the last time I sank my teeth into a steak.

Canada has taken the meat out of our mouths.

Albertans, if you want to taste your own damned cattle again, vote to start the process to leave on Oct 19.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

What Sowell said is exactly right and needs to stop.

[Raquel Dancho @RaquelDancho]

Honda is flagging U.S tariffs, the Liberals’ emissions regulations—an EV mandate by another name—and the Chinese EV deal as driving questions on its future in Canada.

I have been sounding this alarm for months. Unfortunately, it seems the government is incapable of listening to reason, and our auto workers will pay the price.

Watch:

[wealthmoose @wealthmoose]

🇨🇦 Canada didn’t run out of oil.
It made oil shameful.

Canada didn’t run out of land.
It made building impossible.

Canada didn’t run out of workers.
It made hiring unaffordable.

Canada didn’t run out of money.
It redistributed until nothing was left to invest.

This is what managed decline looks like from the inside. 🇨🇦📉

#cdnpoli #Canada

[Maxime Bernier @MaximeBernier]

Five years ago today, I was arrested, handcuffed and put in jail for a non-crime: opposing authoritarian measures against COVID.

While the Conservative Party was hiding, the PPC was the ONLY party that stood firm against the COVID tyranny defending your fundamental freedoms.

Today, the establishment politicians in Ottawa still don’t get it. But we remember.

[Glenda M 🍎 @McfarlaneGlenda]

True story

[Viva Frei @thevivafrei]

Canada proposing banning "social media services" to children 16 and under.

Social media is so toxic to developing minds, they must be shielded from its indoctrinating effects.

But they can consent to a Covid jab without parental consent.

They can "change their genders" and parents must affirm.

They can be exposed to trans and drag queen book reading.

Oh yeah, and this has nothing to do with protecting kids, but rather regulating and gathering data on the adults, who will now have to prove their age to access "social media services".

Canada.

Mutilates children.

Euthanizes its citizens.

Blocks news outlets.

Criminalizes speech.

Freezes bank accounts.

Jails political dissidents.

And now wants to "regulate" "social media services".

A perfect combination of 1930's Germany and modern-day North Korea and China.

[The Architect. @TheMarcitect]

If you are a kid living in Canada now you can openly use hard drugs, you can mutilate your body and pretend you are someone else, and you can sign up to kill yourself all with the government's assistance. But don't you dare go on social media and talk about it.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

The fattest newborn of any mammal on record is the human baby. Almost nothing else comes close.

We arrive at roughly fifteen per cent body fat. A chimpanzee manages about three. Most mammals are born at two or three. We turn up padded like nothing else alive, then peak near twenty-five per cent in the first year.

That padding is the most expensive thing evolution ever built into us, laid down in the womb before the baby takes a breath.

The reason sits just above it. A newborn's brain burns fifty to sixty per cent of the baby's energy, and it builds itself out of fat. The baby fat is both the fuel tank that keeps that brain running between feeds and the raw material it is physically made from.

So a species that supposedly evolved on leaves produces the fattest infants in the animal kingdom, to power the largest brain in it, out of fat.

Then the infant grows up and is handed a leaflet explaining that fat is the thing to fear. The exact substance that built its brain, recast as the enemy.

We are born declaring what we run on. Then we spend a lifetime being taught to flinch at it.

The baby was never confused. Only the adult had to be taught.

[L. Wayne Mathison @WayneMathison]

Ayn Rand’s warning was not about some distant dystopia. It was about the moment a country starts punishing production and rewarding political access.

Look at Liberal Canada.

If you want to build, drill, mine, farm, hire, invest, or expand, you need permission from people who produce nothing but paperwork. If you play the subsidy game, hire the right lobbyist, repeat the right slogans, and flatter the right ministers, money magically appears.

Work gets taxed. Risk gets regulated. Failure gets funded. Competence gets buried under process. Graft gets renamed “partnership.” Waste gets called “investment.” Favours get dressed up as policy.

This is how countries decline. Not all at once. Slowly, stupidly, and with press releases.

Canada does not need more managers of decline. It needs a government that respects the people who actually produce the wealth in the first place.

[wealthmoose @wealthmoose]

🚨 Canada’s institutional capture is now complete.

Since 2015 the Liberals have appointed:

⚖️ 740 of 1,000 federal judges
🏛️ 7 of 9 Supreme Court justices
📜 100 of 105 senators
📰 Fund 30% of every reporter’s salary in Canada

And that’s just the foundation.

Add to that:

📺 CBC: $1.4B annually to defend the Liberal narrative

🏦 Bank of Canada: Redefining recession in real time

📊 StatsCan: Counting Census workers as permanent jobs

📬 Senate: Hiding 240,000 democratic postcards in a warehouse

🌐 Bill C-8: MPs can delete you from the internet without a judge

🎙️ Carney on tape: Admitting central bankers bypassed voters on ESG

They control the courts.
They control the Senate.
They control the Supreme Court.
They control the media funding.
They control the state broadcaster.

Now they want to control the internet.
Not one institution left standing independently.

This is not democracy.
This is managed decline with Canadian characteristics.

And most Canadians are still waiting for CBC to tell them about it.

🇨🇦 Repost and Bookmark🔖 this post.

🇨🇦💀 #CdnPoli #Democracy #InstitutionalCapture #Carney #DefundCBC

[wealthmoose @wealthmoose]

🇨🇦 Mark Carney’s government wants to know your location, your metadata, and your digital history.

They won’t tell you how they spent $120B in foreign aid.

They won’t tell you what Carney discussed at Brookfield.

They won’t sit in the House of Commons and answer questions.
Maximum surveillance.

Zero accountability.🚨

That’s not a democracy. That’s an inversion of one.

🇨🇦 #CdnPoli #BillC8 #Canada

[Great Canadian Moose @Great_Cdn_Moose]

Mark Carney PANICS As Canada's $21 Billion dollar Waste Giant GFL OFFICIALLY Abandons Ontario For Miami Beach!

Why so silent Mark?
You are Canadas biggest problem!

[Dr. Dawn Michael @DawnsMission]

🚨 Mind-blowing farmer confession that hits too close to home...

5th-generation cattle rancher Braden Jensen just dropped a bombshell: They injected 525 hogs with a live mRNA vaccine. Just 21 days later:
25 hogs dead outright
55 anorexic and near death
20 lame
12 lost all condition
25 more showing near-death symptoms

This rancher isn’t talking about some sci-fi experiment... he’s describing exactly what countless people have reported after the mRNA shots for humans.

Same spike protein tech. Same rapid, devastating outcomes. Same “safe and effective” sales pitch. What do y’all think about this??

[Nav Toor @heynavtoor]

You have noticed it. ChatGPT feels dumber than it used to. Your prompts that worked six months ago produce worse results now. The writing sounds flatter. The ideas sound safer. The internet itself feels like it is shrinking. Every article reads the same. Every email sounds the same. Every answer sounds like it was written by the same voice.

You thought it was you. It is not you.

Researchers at Oxford and Cambridge published a paper in Nature proving what is happening. They call it Model Collapse.

Here is the mechanism in one sentence. AI trained on AI-generated data gets dumber every generation until it forgets what real human data looked like.

The internet is filling with AI-generated content. Blog posts. Articles. Reviews. Comments. Social media. AI companies scrape the internet to train the next generation of models. Which means the next generation of AI is being trained on the output of the current generation.

Each cycle loses information. Not randomly. It loses the rarest, most unusual, most creative parts first. The researchers call these the "tails of the distribution." The weird ideas. The unexpected perspectives. The things that made the internet feel human. Those disappear first.

What remains is the average. The safe. The expected. The bland.

Then the next generation trains on that. And loses more. And the next generation trains on that. And loses more. The researchers proved this is not a slow decline. Major degradation happens within just a few iterations. Even when some of the original human data is preserved.

They tested it on large language models. On image generators. On statistical models. The pattern was the same every time. The output converges toward a narrow, flattened version of reality that looks nothing like the original data.

The lead researcher put it plainly. "Large language models are like fire. A useful tool. But one that pollutes the environment."

The pollution is invisible. You cannot see which sentence on the internet was written by a human and which was written by AI. Neither can the AI that is about to train on it. And once the tails are gone, they do not come back. The damage is irreversible.

This is not a prediction anymore. It is a diagnosis.

The internet you grew up on was built by humans writing things no algorithm would have written. Strange, personal, imperfect, alive. That internet is being diluted. One generation of AI at a time. And the models trained on what remains are learning a smaller and smaller version of the world.

Model Collapse is not a technical problem. It is a cultural one. The thing that made the internet worth reading is the thing that disappears first.

[Kat Kanada 🏴 @KatKanada_TM]

Gad Saad thinks Canada is in Stage 5 of suicidal empathy because it's a country that's a collection of all the most dreadful ideas: open border policies, non-meritocracy, socialism, narcissism, laziness, & greed.

He is not optimistic about the country's future.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

A ewe died lambing in the night, which happens, and left a single lamb, which also happens, and the lamb was given to Eduardo, which does not usually happen, and is the reason there is an alpaca in this story at all.

The orphan was the problem every shepherd dreads, a day-old lamb with no mother, too small to defend, the exact thing a fox prices up at dusk. The farmer could have brought it indoors to bottle-rear, and might yet, but he tried something first, because Eduardo was in the field and Eduardo is what he is.

Alpacas guard. It is why the farmer keeps one in with the sheep, the watchfulness bred into a creature that spent thousands of years as a sentinel on Andean hillsides, the instinct to put itself between a threat and the herd and to face down a fox until the fox does the arithmetic and leaves. What the farmer was not sure of was whether that instinct would extend to a lamb that was not even a fellow alpaca, an orphan of another species set down in the grass.

It extended. Eduardo went over, did the long careful camelid inspection, the humming and the close looking, and then simply stayed. Where the lamb went, the alpaca went, at a distance of a few feet, all day, a tall watchful shadow over a small wobbling one. At dusk, when a lamb alone would have been a fox's evening, the lamb was not alone. It was lying tucked against the legs of an animal that does not run from foxes and never has.

The lamb is alive a week on, which a lamb in that position frequently is not. It thinks, as far as anyone can tell, that it is a small strange alpaca, and follows Eduardo about, and Eduardo permits this with the air of a creature who has acquired a responsibility he did not ask for and intends to discharge properly anyway.

The farmer watches them, the alpaca and the lamb that is not his, and reflects that he keeps Eduardo for the fibre and the guarding and the comedy, and got, thrown in for nothing, a creature who will mother an orphan of the wrong species through the dangerous first week because something in him simply cannot watch a small thing be undefended.

That was not in the brochure. The best things on a farm rarely are.

[Dr. Heidi Klessig @heidiklessigmd]

High school sophomore Eliot Abramson was struck in the back of the neck by a ball while playing lacrosse on June 1, 2026. A firefighter at the scene kept his heart beating until he could be taken to a hospital.

From the statements in the media reports, it appears that this unfortunate young man went on to become an organ donor under the controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) protocol.

If this was the case, here’s how the DCD protocol works:

1. He signed up at the DMV with absolutely no informed consent process to become an organ donor.

2. He sustained a critical injury.

3. His heart was beating, and he apparently did not meet criteria for brain death. But his prognosis for recovery was poor.

4. His family decided to withdraw his medical support. But because he had registered as an organ donor, his support was mandated to be removed in such a way as to allow organ procurement.

5. He was given a do not resuscitate (DNR) order, because while he could have been resuscitated, a decision had been made not to do so.

6. His ventilator was withdrawn, and the stopwatches started ticking: hypoxia is very detrimental to organ viability. He needed to become pulseless fairly quickly so his organs would be viable for donation. 

7. Once pulselessness was achieved, doctors observe a 2-5 minute stand-off period to be sure there is no spontaneous return of circulation before beginning organ procurement as quickly as possible.

The problem with the DCD protocol is that people are routinely able to be resuscitated after just 2-5 minutes of pulselessness, and if you could still be resuscitated, you are not dead. 

This is why there have been cases of DCD donors who have resumed heartbeat and breathing during the removal of their organs.

The New York Times reported on multiple instances of problems with recovery during the DCD process in an article last year.

A 2-5 minute stand-off period is far too short to be sure death has occurred because people have been documented to have auto-resuscitated and made a full recovery after 10 minutes of pulselessness.

But waiting for more than 10 minutes is too hard on organ viability. 

The DCD protocol is a concealed form of physician-assisted death for the sake of viable organs.

[JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦 @JayGenXer]

Something that is often overlooked?? It was Trudeau that STARTED the 51st State thought!!

If you’re losing your mind over Trump joking about Canada as the 51st state, but you’re totally fine with EU leaders openly talking about Canada becoming their 28th state…

You didn’t just miss the point. You swallowed the propaganda whole.

One guy made a troll comment during a trade fight.

The other side is actually floating the idea of folding Canada into a European superstate — and the same people who claim to care about “sovereignty” suddenly go quiet.

That’s not principle. That’s programming.

You were trained to get triggered by the orange man and trained to stay calm when globalists talk about absorbing your country.

Wake up. The real threat to Canada isn’t a joke from Trump.

It’s the people who want to hand pieces of this country to Brussels while telling you it’s “progress.”

#cdnpoli #CanadaFirst #Sovereignty #LiberalFail

[Melanie In Saskatchewan @saskatchewan_in]

WHO LIED?

An Open Letter to Mark Carney, James Maloney, and the Liberal Caucus

I was standing at my kitchen counter the other night, somewhere between figuring out what's for supper, answering text messages, and trying to remember why I walked into the room, when I stumbled into one of the stranger political stories I've seen in a while.

Not because of what happened, but because of how everyone on the left is pretending it didn't.

First, Toronto Star columnist Althia Raj published a story reporting that some Liberal MPs were unhappy with Mark Carney's leadership style. According to the reporting, MPs described a Prime Minister who yells, lashes out, and doesn't respond particularly well to being challenged.

Now, that on its own wouldn't have caught my attention. Politicians complain about politicians. Water is wet. Cats knock things off shelves. Life goes on.

Then #Liberal MP James Maloney showed up on @CTV_PowerPlay with @VassyKapelos

For those unfamiliar, Mr. Maloney is not some random Liberal MP wandering through the hallways looking for a camera. He's the Liberal Caucus Chair. His job is literally to know what's going on in caucus. And what did he tell Canadians?

"The story is wrong."

Not partly wrong.
Not missing context.
Not exaggerated.
Just wrong.

I suggest the next Secret Santa who pulls Maloney's name from a hat buy the man a dictionary because he clearly doesn't grasp the meaning of the word "wrong."🤦🏼‍♀️

And his adamantly vehement response on HOW wrong seemed pretty definitive! Case closed. Everybody back to work.
It was apparently so wrong, that he struggled to explain it, sputtering and reaching for words the way an angry toddler being weaned reaches for their conficscated binky.

Except then the Globe and Mail arrived and ruined the ending Maloney worked so hard to feed Canadians in the mistaken belief we would believe him.

A few days later, the Globe published its own reporting under the headline "As Carney Faces Pressure to Deliver, Some Liberal MPs Question His Leadership Style."

Not exactly a ringing endorsement there Mr. Carney.

The Globe reported concerns among Liberal MPs and detailed a heated confrontation involving Jaime Battiste during a caucus meeting.

But hold on a second here!

👉🏻 The Toronto Star says MPs are unhappy.

👉🏻 James Maloney says the story is wrong.

👉🏻 The Globe and Mail says MPs are unhappy.

At this point, even my handful of cats could identify that we have a contradiction, a knot in the ball of yarn so to speak.

Somebody is wrong. And since Liberals are forever lecturing Canadians about trusting institutions, respecting liberal approved media outlets and their journalism, and listening to experts, perhaps they could help us out here.

If the Toronto Star and Globe and Mail are publishing fiction, why are taxpayers subsidizing them? That seems like a fairly important issue.

Canadians were assured these are trusted news organizations. If they're inventing stories about the Prime Minister, I would think somebody should probably look into that.🤷🏼‍♀️

On the other hand, if the reporting is substantially accurate, then why did James Maloney go on national television and tell Canadians otherwise? And how can he expect to ever be taken at his word again?

Better yet, if he was defending a narrative that keeps running face first into additional reporting, why is he still Caucus Chair?

Why is he chairing anything?

Why is Maloney in a leadership role instead of occupying a nice quiet seat somewhere in the back row where the only thing he can misrepresent is whether the coffee in the caucus room is fresh?

The part I find most amusing is that we're all supposed to pretend this came out of nowhere.

It didn't!
Similar stories followed Mark Carney around Britain years ago. Stories describing him as:

Demanding.
Abrasive.
Impatient.
Difficult.
Angry.
Has a temper... take your pick of any synonym because most of them were used at some point or other to describe Carney’s leadership style.

At the time we were assured those criticisms were unfair. Now Liberal MPs are reportedly saying remarkably similar things. What are the odds of that? Should Canadians run out to the nearest lotto kiosk and get tickets?

▪︎ Maybe everybody in Britain got it wrong?
▪︎ Maybe Liberal MPs got it wrong?
▪︎ Maybe the Toronto Star got it wrong?
▪︎ Maybe the Globe and Mail got it wrong?
▪︎ Maybe James Maloney got it wrong?

Or, maybe we're witnessing the largest outbreak of mistaken identity since Ottawa assured Canadians the carbon tax would leave them better off and cabinet ministers started confusing press releases with accomplishments.

Or maybe Canadians are finally seeing the difference between a carefully managed campaign image and an actual governing style.

I don't know. What I do know is that somebody's story doesn't add up. And every day Liberals spend insisting Canadians shouldn't notice the contradiction only makes the contradiction more noticeable.

It's a bit like standing in the kitchen insisting nothing is burning while smoke pours out of the oven. Sooner or later, somebody is going to open the door and set off the smoke alarm. And as we all know, where there's smoke, there's fire.

Sincerely,

Mélanie in Saskatchewan

Sources

• Althia Raj, Toronto Star, "He Yells": Mark Carney's Focus Has Liberal MPs Bristling

• James Maloney appearance on CTV defending Carney and stating "the story is wrong"

• Marieke Walsh and Stephanie Levitz, Globe and Mail, As Carney Faces Pressure to Deliver, Some Liberal MPs Question His Leadership Style

• Reporting on the Jaime Battiste caucus confrontation as described in the Globe and Mail article

• Historical reporting and commentary regarding Mark Carney’s management style during his tenure at the Bank of England (2013-2020), including recurring descriptions of him as demanding, abrasive, impatient, and difficult to work with, published across various UK media outlets during and following his governorship.

• Additional discussion and analysis of the Toronto Star allegations and Liberal caucus reaction appearing in Canadian political media and commentary outlets between June 3-8, 2026, including National Newswatch, Todayville, CTV panel discussions, and other parliamentary reporting.

Timeline

June 3, 2026: Toronto Star publishes Althia Raj’s report alleging Liberal MPs describe Carney as someone who "yells" and lashes out.

June 4, 2026: Liberal Caucus Chair James Maloney appears on CTV and states, "the story is wrong."

June 6, 2026: Globe and Mail publishes "As Carney Faces Pressure to Deliver, Some Liberal MPs Question His Leadership Style" reporting additional caucus concerns and detailing the Jaime Battiste caucus confrontation as described in the Globe and Mail article

https://t.co/PYhh7QG0lH

#cdnpoli #MarkCarney @j_maloney @CTVNews @MariekeWalsh @althiaraj @globeandmail @Star_Politics