Of course I want to live in a safe, high-trust society. That’s exactly why I reject the idea that safety should be turned into a racial argument.
I want children to be able to go to school without worrying about being shot. I want kids of every race to be protected from violence, abuse, discrimination, and hatred. I want women of every race to be able to walk home safely. I want men to be able to go to work and come home safely. I want people to walk into stores, restaurants, neighborhoods, or anywhere else without wondering whether their race is going to make them a target.
I want Black, White, Hispanic, Asian, Native American everybody to feel protected.
And when somebody commits a crime or acts recklessly, hold that individual accountable. If a Black person commits a crime, arrest that person. If a White person does it, arrest that person. Same for anybody else. I’m not defending bad behavior.
What I’m NOT going to do is watch one group of Black people behaving badly and conclude, “That’s how Black people behave.” I wouldn’t do that to White people, Asians, Hispanics, or anybody else either.
You asked whether I want a safe society. Absolutely. I just want that safety for everyone without turning an individual’s wrongdoing into an indictment of millions of innocent people who happen to share their skin color.
Punish the behavior. Hold the person accountable. Protect everybody. Race doesn’t need to enter the equation.
And this right here proves exactly where this conversation has gone. You’ve gone from trying to debate IQ, genetics, and history to literally claiming Black people aren’t human.
Black people are Homo sapiens, the exact same human species as White people, Asians, and every other living human population. Differences in ancestry, pigmentation, or genetic variants do not make racial groups different species.
You can dislike Black people all you want, but your prejudice cannot rewrite human biology.
If your argument requires denying the humanity of an entire race, you’re not presenting science anymore. You’re just presenting racism and calling it science.
So we’ve officially moved from debating facts to threatening to “put me to sleep for good.” Got it.
If you disagree with something I said, challenge the argument and bring evidence. Threatening violence because you don’t like what somebody posts doesn’t prove your point it shows you don’t have a response to it.
I’m keeping a screenshot of this one. Threats aren’t debate.
😂 You might want to actually understand the paper before posting the meme made from it.
Finding archaic DNA admixture in African populations does NOT mean Africans are another species, and it does NOT debunk the African origin of modern humans.
Humans outside Africa carry archaic ancestry too. Many non-African populations carry roughly 1–4% Neanderthal ancestry, and Denisovan ancestry also exists in some populations. Does that suddenly make Europeans and Asians Neanderthals or a separate species? Obviously not.
Ancient human populations interbred. That’s what introgression means.
All living humans are still Homo sapiens, and human DNA is overwhelmingly alike. The Smithsonian summarizes the evidence plainly: modern Homo sapiens evolved in Africa, and all living humans belong to the same species.
So the research is fascinating. The racist meme somebody pasted beside it is not the scientific conclusion of the research.
Posting a scientific paper doesn’t make the meme scientific. You have to actually understand what the paper says.
And here’s another problem with your argument: you keep talking about “Africans” like hundreds of millions of people across an entire continent share one intelligence level.
Meanwhile, you’re literally posting this argument on X, a platform owned by Elon Musk a man born and raised in South Africa who is currently ranked the richest person in the world. 😂 He even became the first person in history estimated to be worth $1 trillion earlier this year.
Now, does Elon Musk being South African prove that Africans are inherently smarter than everybody else? Of course not. And that’s exactly the point.
An individual’s intelligence, accomplishments, or failures cannot establish the intelligence of an entire race or continent.
You’re trying to take differences between historical civilizations and turn them into evidence that modern racial groups have genetically different levels of intelligence. That conclusion does not follow from your evidence.
Africa contains thousands of ethnic groups and an enormous amount of genetic, cultural and historical diversity. Stop treating an entire continent like it was one civilization populated by one type of person.
And the irony of making that argument on a South African-born billionaire’s platform is pretty damn funny. 😂
The whole point of me posting these videos is not to say White people are bad. It’s to show you how ridiculous it is to take the actions of an individual and apply them to an entire race.
I can find a White person stealing. I can find a White person fighting. I can find a White person running around naked in public. And you can find Black people doing those things too. That proves nothing about either race.
If I showed you one White man stealing and said, “See, White people are thieves,” you’d immediately tell me that one person doesn’t represent all White people. Exactly. That same standard applies to Black people.
You don’t get to say, “He’s just one individual” when the person is White, but suddenly make someone’s behavior representative of their entire race when the person is Black.
Bad behavior is bad behavior. The person is responsible for what they did not millions of strangers who happen to share their skin color. That’s the point.
You’re missing the entire point of why I posted the video. You want me to calculate the percentage of Black people versus White people doing this, when race was never the point.
This is a grown man running around a baseball field completely naked in front of a crowd where children could be present. Instead of addressing his individual behavior, you immediately want to turn it into a racial comparison.
I posted it because people keep showing videos of individual Black people acting wild and then using those individuals to make statements about Black people as a whole. So I showed you a White individual acting wild to demonstrate how ridiculous that logic is.
I’m not claiming his behavior represents White people. That’s literally my point. He represents himself, just like a Black person behaving badly represents themselves.
Stop turning individual behavior into racial behavior. It’s the person, not the race. Remember that: the person.
You just jumped from “Africa didn’t invent the wheel” to “some races are genetically smarter” without proving the connection between those two statements. 😂
And your history is wrong anyway. Africa is a continent, not one civilization. Ancient Egyptians used hieroglyphic writing thousands of years before Notre-Dame existed. The Geʽez script developed in the Horn of Africa, and West Africa later had major centers of manuscript scholarship such as Timbuktu. African societies also used wheeled transport in various periods the wheel simply wasn’t equally useful or widespread everywhere.
More importantly, whether a civilization invented a particular technology tells you nothing about the innate IQ of every descendant of people from that continent. Geography, environment, trade networks, political institutions, disease, education, nutrition and historical circumstances all affect technological development and measured cognitive performance.
So if your claim is that race itself genetically determines intelligence, post the genetic evidence establishing that causal relationship. A meme with two bell curves and a color-coded map isn’t it.
Absolutely. Anecdotal is seeing a video of some people behaving a certain way and using it to characterize an entire race. Statistical is collecting representative data from a population and analyzing it systematically.
So if someone watches a clip and says, “See, Black people act like monkeys,” that is literally anecdotal reasoning. Posting a video of White people acting wild demonstrates exactly why that logic is ridiculous.
Now show me the statistic that scientifically establishes “acting like caged monkeys” as a racial characteristic. I’ll wait. 😂
You’re confusing modern infrastructure with the right to land. Roads, electricity, plumbing, and buildings being constructed later doesn’t erase the people who already lived there. By that logic, whoever builds the newest infrastructure anywhere gets to claim the country.
And saying Native peoples “built nothing of value” just shows you don’t know their history. They had cities, agriculture, trade networks, governments, irrigation systems, architecture, and established territories long before European settlement.
Technology changes. History doesn’t disappear because somebody poured concrete over it. And the “hut” comment isn’t history, it’s just you reaching for a stereotype because your argument fell apart.
army was only 2–3,000, so they didn’t own the land” isn’t an argument. Native peoples weren’t one country with one army they were many separate nations and societies spread across the continent. Military size doesn’t determine whether a people inhabited or governed territory.
And ��go live in a hut” just tells me you’re arguing from stereotypes instead of history.
You did a “simple word search” and still didn’t understand what you found. 😂 You’re talking about Larry P. v. Riles. The court restricted IQ testing because Black children were being disproportionately misclassified into special-education classes, and the court found serious problems with how those tests were being used not because Black people were “too low IQ to test.”
And no, IQ tests weren’t universally made “illegal to render to Blacks.” Even federal employment law allows professionally developed ability tests as long as they aren’t being used discriminatorily and meet applicable validation requirements.
You found a discrimination case designed to protect Black children from misclassification and somehow interpreted it as proof of Black inferiority. That says more about your reading comprehension than anybody’s IQ.
@LuisDefrei53757@ChudTheBuilder 😂 You posted a photoshopped racist caricature and called somebody else dumb. That’s not biology, genetics, or evidence. It’s literally a fake picture. If this is the level of “proof” you’re working with, you already lost the argument.
😂 Literally every claim you made is wrong. Black people have frontal lobes. Black people take IQ and standardized cognitive tests. And Black and White people are unquestionably the same species: Homo sapiens. Skin pigmentation doesn’t create a new species. You said “prove it wrong,” but basic human biology already did.
See how easy this is? 😂 I can find a White person looking crazy with missing teeth and pretend they represent every White person. But they don’t. Just like the Black people you keep posting don’t represent every Black person. You’re proving stereotypes are built by cherry-picking individuals, not facts.
@mrbradywasright@Man_Musk_Lover@ChudTheBuilder Not all of them. Especially the men apparently 😂😂”
See how easy that is? I can cherry-pick White people naked in public doing ridiculous shit too. Doesn’t represent White people it represents that individual. Humans do stupid shit. Race has nothing to do with it.
That’s not what “derived allele” means. 😂 Lower derived allele frequency reflects ancestral genetic variation and population history, not being “closer to chimps.” All modern humans share the same evolutionary split from chimpanzees. You’re turning genetics terminology into a racial hierarchy it doesn’t support.
😂 You might want to open a history book before bragging about who supposedly taught whom to write. Writing existed in Africa thousands of years ago. Ancient Egypt developed hieroglyphic writing around the late 4th millennium BCE, and African civilizations produced written records, literature, mathematics, law and scholarship long before modern concepts of “White” and “Black” even existed.
And Europeans didn’t independently invent writing either the alphabets that eventually influenced European writing developed through older Near Eastern and Mediterranean writing traditions.
Human civilization is a chain of cultures learning from other cultures. Nobody gets to claim their skin color invented knowledge. Your argument doesn’t prove racial superiority; it proves you don’t know the history you’re bragging about.