Seems prudent to ask since 5 mths have passed since the 1 and only @CoinPoker_OFF statement about Bots what’s been happening since?How many bots have been identified,accounts closed and monies refunded to affected players since?Or is it bot free now? Security seems lax currently?
1/7 The timing on @CoinPoker_OFF's big "98 bots banned + $156k refunded" announcement is *way* too convenient.
Zamani drops the viral Bovada bot farm video on Jan 17-18, 2026 → massive outrage.
CoinPoker announces refunds "this week" literally the next day. Coincidence? 🤔
@senortilt Direct message players by affiliates ? Not so sure on that one , different jurisdictional issues but usually you’ll (site) bear full responsibility for those interactions which will no doubt be “push to play” - sounds like a nightmare in the making re RG
@senortilt Knowing the “whole playbook” (that has now been flogged to death anyway) wouldn’t be the way to go imo - there’s been very little structural originality in any of this for 25yrs - I don’t see anyone building anything with any real USP , its all just the same (addictive 👍👍) turd
@Dollartree_1@jaysouthbets@senortilt They are not suing you …quite the opposite at this juncture - it’s for you to decide how to proceed that’s a shot across the bow nothing more
@senortilt I’ve been about a while - and thank you …. manners cost nothing
On that tiltrips you could consider some form of real life treasure hunt thing with high value cards hidden in locations to be redeemed for cash on the site - must have account BEFORE the hunt starts etc
@senortilt Understand the time zone but weekend maybe ? Just google paddy power finders keepers (money dropped into accounts and people had to log in to claim otherwise it was removed etc with hints as to first names locations to get community involved) PP are marketing geniuses just copy
@senortilt The best version of what your doing here was Paddy Power Finders Keepers you should look at it
(Noon on a Friday ? Is your customer base all unemployed ?)
Question for people who understand provably fair systems:
I was recording my screen live on a casino with the fairness panel open, showing my client seed and the hashed server seed.
The casino support told me to clear cookies/cache as a troubleshooting step, so I followed their own instructions.
After clearing cookies/cache and logging back into the exact same account, I noticed that the seed shown on the site was different, even though I had not manually requested any seed change.
To check whether it was just a visual/UI issue, I saved the auth token from both sessions: one before clearing cookies/cache and one after logging back in.
Obviously, the tokens were different because they were two different sessions, but both belonged to the same account.
The strange part is that when I called the API endpoint to get the seed data using each token, the API returned different seed information for the same account.
So my question is:
Is this considered normal behavior in a provably fair system, where seed data can vary depending on the session/token?
Or should the active seed be clearly tied to the account, with every change requiring explicit user action, a clear warning, or at least a transparent audit trail?
Because if following a normal support-recommended action like clearing cookies/cache can result in different seed data being returned for the same account, that seems concerning for a casino claiming to be provably fair.
Not accusing anyone yet. I’m asking the community before making any conclusions.
@coinbetscom@provablyfairorg@hairlessEV@sebviceversa@Tanzanite_xyz@fairgambling@zachxbt@navarro_ivar
Is this technically acceptable, or is it a serious red flag?
P.S. I have the entire process recorded.
This is crazy! Jeremy is probably the only high stakes reg who vlogs consistently. To deny him seems very bizarre. What better way to get new players than the most successful vlogger with the most bracelets in the industry showing how he plays.